Journal of Andrology Testis Workshop 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Published-Ahead-of-Print October 16, 2008, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.108.006171

This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/2/200    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bernard Robaire
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamzeh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robaire, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamzeh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robaire, B.

Effect of Testosterone on Epithelial Cell Proliferation in the Regressed Rat Epididymis

Mahsa Hamzeh and Bernard Robaire *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bernard.robaire{at}mcgill.ca.

It is well established that testosterone plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of epididymal structure and function. However, the role of testosterone in restoring the cellular architecture of the regressed epididymis is not well known. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that testosterone triggers the regressed epididymis by re-expanding existing cells and inducing cell proliferation. Testosterone-dependent epididymal morphology was evaluated in orchidectomized, regressed rats after initiation of treatment with testosterone. Besides that, the proliferative activity of epithelial cells in all regions of the epididymis of the orchidectomized, regressed rats was assessed at 1, 3, 7, and 28-days after testosterone replacement. Epithelial cell proliferation decreased after testosterone withdrawal and increased following testosterone administration. We found that BrdU-incorporation and PCNA expression increased significantly 3 days after testosterone replacement in all regions of the regressed epididymis except in the initial segment. The highest mitotic activity was seen in the corpus epididymidis at 3-day post-implantation. Using specific markers for each cell type, we found no significant changes in the proportion of each cell type compared to control. We observed labeled nuclei in all epithelial cell types in control; however, principal cells were the major cell types that responded to testosterone after regression. These observations demonstrate that the mammalian epididymis is not a static tissue without any significant cell renewal, both under control conditions and when androgen exposure is altered, thus providing new insight in the role of androgen in restoration and maintenance of the architecture of the epididymis.


Key words: Androgen • Epididymis • Hormone • Reproductive Tract






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Andrology.