Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Published-Ahead-of-Print September 6, 2006, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.106.000646

This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/170    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mieusset, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bujan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mieusset, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bujan, L.

Effect of posture and clothing on scrotal temperature in fertile men

Roger Mieusset *, Bourras Bengoudifa , and Louis Bujan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mieusset.r{at}chu-toulouse.fr.

Investigation of the effects of body position and clothing on the temperature of the scrotum has given discordant results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate these effects in 13 fertile male volunteers in successive positions each held for 15 minutes, either Supine, Standing, Seated with legs apart, and Seated with legs crossed (n = 8) or Standing, Seated with legs crossed and Standing (n = 5), at first naked and then clothed. The Standing naked position was that in which scrotal temperature reached the lowest point. Clothing increased the scrotal temperature compared with the naked state, whatever the position. The Seated with legs crossed position had specific characteristics: in the naked state, it was thermogenic and increased scrotal temperature as much as clothing in the Supine or Standing positions; in the clothed state, the increase in temperature was less than expected, which could indicate that local mechanisms are involved. Moreover, the Seated with legs crossed position had a persisting effect on scrotal temperature in the next position. These results have both pathophysiological and epidemiological implications.


Key words: Testis • human • scrotum • thermoregulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Joffe
What has happened to human fertility?
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2010; 25(2): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ReproductionHome page
C. Paul, A. A Murray, N. Spears, and P. T K Saunders
A single, mild, transient scrotal heat stress causes DNA damage, subfertility and impairs formation of blastocysts in mice
Reproduction, July 1, 2008; 136(1): 73 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Paul, D. W. Melton, and P. T.K. Saunders
Do heat stress and deficits in DNA repair pathways have a negative impact on male fertility?
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society of Andrology.