Journal of Andrology Testis Workshop 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Published-Ahead-of-Print September 6, 2006, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.106.000521

This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/158    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kruger, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kruger, T. F.

Correlation between semen parameters and the hamster egg penetration test (HEPT) among fertile and subfertile men in Singapore

Lee Mee Ho *, Alvin Soon Tiong Lim , Tse Hui Lim , Siew Chen Hum , Su Ling Yu , and Theunis Frans Kruger

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ho.lee.mee{at}sgh.com.sg.

The objective of this retrospective study was to distinguish between fertile and subfertile men based on their semen parameters and hamster egg penetration test (HEPT) outcome. This study involved 110 subfertile men recruited from an infertility clinic and 48 fertile men attending an antenatal clinic in Singapore. The men were required to donate a semen specimen for semen analysis and HEPT assay. The results indicated that the subfertile group had significantly lower normal sperm morphology according to the Tygerberg strict criteria, and lower progressive motility (p <0.05). Semen volume, density, HEPT decondensation rate, and sperm penetration index were not significantly different between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that sperm morphology had the highest predictive power of 65.7%, with a threshold value of 7%; and progressive motility had a predictive power of 61.8%, with a threshold value of 50%. Using the tenth percentile of the fertile population as the cut-off, lower thresholds of ≤3% for sperm morphology and <28% for progressive motility were obtained, giving higher positive predictive values of 81.8% and 84.4%, respectively. This study shows that these new cut-off values can be used to screen the general population to identify subfertile men. In contrast, the HEPT proved to be an insensitive and unreliable assay in identifying subfertile males. To our knowledge the comparison of HEPT and semen parameters between subfertile and fertile men has not been previously reported in an Asian population.


Key words: Semen Analysis • Sperm • Normal Motile Count • Sperm Function Assay • Sperm Morphology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society of Andrology.