Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published-Ahead-of-Print November 22, 2005, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.04152

This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/2/176    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fatehi, A.N.
Right arrow Articles by Gadella, B.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fatehi, A.N.
Right arrow Articles by Gadella, B.M.

DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages

A.N. Fatehi , M.M. Bevers , E. Schoevers , B.A.J. Roelen , B. Colenbrander , and B.M. Gadella *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: B.Gadella{at}vet.uu.nl.

The main goal of this study was to investigate whether and at what level damage of paternal DNA influences fertilization of oocytes and early embryonic development. We hypothesized that post-testicular sperm DNA damage will only marginally affect sperm physiology due to the lack of gene expression, but that it will effect embryo development at the stage that embryo genome (including the paternal damaged DNA) expression is initiated. To test this we artificially induced sperm DNA damage by irradiation with X or gamma rays (doses of 0-300 Gy). Remarkably sperm cells survived the irradiation quite well and when compared to non-irradiated cells, sperm motility and integrity of plasma membrane, acrosome and mitochondria were not altered by this irradiation treatment. In contrast, a highly significant logarithmic relation between irradiation dose and induced DNA damage to sperm cells was found by both terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and the acridin orange assay. Despite the DNA damage, irradiated sperm cells did not show any sign of apoptosis (nuclear fragmentation, depolarization of inner mitochondrial membranes or phospholipid scrambling) and were normally capable to fertilize oocytes, as there was no reduction in cleavage rates when compared to non-irradiated sperm samples up to irradiation doses of <10 Gy. Further embryonic development was completely blocked as the blastocyst rates at day 7 and 9 dropped from 28 % (non-irradiated sperm) to <3% by >2.5 Gy irradiated sperm.. This block in embryonic development was accompanied with the initiation of apoptosis after the second or third cleavage. Specific signs of apoptosis such as nuclear fragmentation and aberrations in spindle formation were observed in all embryos resulting from IVF with irradiated sperm (irradiation doses >1.25 Gy). The results show that sperm DNA damage does not impair fertilization of the oocyte or completion of the first 2-3 cleavages, but blocks blastocyst formation by inducing apoptosis. Embryos produced by assisted reproductive techniques (ART) could have incorporated aberrant paternal DNA (frequently detected in sperm of sub/infertile males). Analogously, in the present work, we discuss the possibility of following embryo development of oocytes fertilized by ART through the blastocyst stage before embryo transfer into the uterus in order to reduce risks of reproductive failure.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. Ardon, D. Helms, E. Sahin, H. Bollwein, E. Topfer-Petersen, and D. Waberski
Chromatin-unstable boar spermatozoa have little chance of reaching oocytes in vivo
Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 461 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Paul, D. W. Melton, and P. T.K. Saunders
Do heat stress and deficits in DNA repair pathways have a negative impact on male fertility?
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Perez-Crespo, P. Moreira, B. Pintado, and A. Gutierrez-Adan
Factors From Damaged Sperm Affect Its DNA Integrity and Its Ability to Promote Embryo Implantation in Mice
J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. W Li, J. D Biggers, H. Y Elmoazzen, M. Toner, L. McGinnis, and K C K. Lloyd
Long-term storage of mouse spermatozoa after evaporative drying
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 919 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Andrology.