| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
From the Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| Correspondence to: Dr Adrian Eley, Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, United Kingdom (e-mail: a.r.eley{at}sheffield.ac.uk). |
Much is known about the role of Chlamydia trachomatis in female
infertility, although the same cannot be said about the organism's role in
male infertility. Recently a number of researchers have provided a possible
explanation of the pathogenesis of C trachomatis in male infertility
and have suggested further studies. Unfortunately, current screening
recommendations for C trachomatis in an infertile couple are vague
and unhelpful, and many do not even mention this type of screening in the
male. To enable any progress to be made in this field, it is essential that
investigators know how best to detect C trachomatis, especially in
the male. It is important, therefore, to know which specimen is best for C
trachomatis detection, with respective strengths and weaknesses of each
specimen. Similarly, it is equally important to have knowledge of which test
is appropriate for the type of specimen being examined. First void urine is
currently the specimen of choice for the routine detection of C
trachomatis in males. Moreover, the best detection protocols in the
developed world are based on molecular diagnosis of first void urine. These
methods provide the best combination of sensitivity and specificity that is
currently available on a clinical sample that can be self-taken.
Interestingly, because semen is routinely collected for analysis in men of
infertile couples, it has been suggested that protocols be developed for the
optimal detection of C trachomatis in this specimen. Semen might
provide additional information on infection of the upper genital tract, which
may not be detected in first void urine. Finally, the importance of comparing
tests for C trachomatis detection in updating our knowledge has been
highlighted by the inability of some molecular methods to detect the new
variant strain of C trachomatis.
Key words: First void urine, semen, molecular diagnostics
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |