Published-Ahead-of-Print March 21, 2007, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.106.001958
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 28, No. 4, July/August 2007
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.106.001958
Impact of Ca2+ Flux Inhibitors on Acrosome Reaction of Hamster Spermatozoa
HUAI L. FENG*,
YI B. HAN
,
AVNER HERSHLAG* AND
LEI J. ZHENG
From the * Center for Human Reproduction, North
Shore University Hospital, New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset,
New York;
Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
Columbia University Center for Women's
Reproductive Care, New York, New York.
|
Correspondence to: Dr Huai L. Feng, Associate Professor, The Center for Human
Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University
Hospital, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY 11030 (e-mail:
hfeng{at}nshs.edu). |
Ca2+ plays a prominent role in the regulation of critical
functions of spermatozoa, such as capacitation, acrosome reaction (AR), and
fertilization. While there is consensus that Ca2+ is essential,
researchers have reported conflicting results as to what happens to
Ca2+ flux across the sperm membrane during capacitation and AR. The
purpose of the present study was to further delineate the function of
Ca2+ channels and their role in sperm capacitation and AR.
Epididymides were obtained from healthy adult male hamsters. Spermatozoa were
washed with modified Tyrode medium supplemented with 0.3% bovine serum
albumin, adjusted to 4.5 x 107 motile sperm/mL and incubated
in 200-µL droplets for 4 hours at 37°C in the presence of
trifluoperazine (TFP), a calmodulin inhibitor, at 25, 50, 100, or 150 nM;
verapamil (VP), a Ca2+ channel inhibitor, at 25, 50, 100, or 150
nM; or nifedipine (NF), a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel inhibitor,
at 50, 100, 200, or 400 nM. Spermatozoa were assessed for AR by using
Coomassie brilliant blue staining techniques. Results indicated that
incubation of sperm with Ca2+ channel inhibitors for 4 hours
significantly reduced AR in the study groups (TFP: 88% ± 2.3%, 65%
± 2.0%, 60% ± 2.2%, 54 % ± 2.2%, respectively; VP: 45%
± 1.3%, 23 % ± 1.2%, 12% ± 1.0%, 8% ± 0.6%,
respectively; and NF: 11% ± 0.8%, 9% ± 0.3%, 7.0% ± 0.1%,
6.0% ± 0.1%, respectively) compared with control group (95% ±
3.0%, P < .05). However, increasing the concentrations of TFP and
NF did not result in further suppression of AR. In summary, the antagonists of
calmodulin and Ca2+ channel inhibitors suppress sperm AR.
Key words: Calcium
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Feng, Y. B. Han, A. E. T. Sparks, and J. I. Sandlow
Characterization of Human Sperm Antigens Reacting With Anti-Sperm Antibodies From an Infertile Female Patient's Serum
J Androl,
July 1, 2008;
29(4):
440 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society of Andrology.