| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
Center for Human Reproduction, North Shore University Hospital—New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York.
| Correspondence to: Dr Huai L Feng, Associate Professor, Center for Human Reproduction, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY 11030 (e-mail: hfeng{at}nshs.edu). |
| Received for publication November 3, 2006; accepted for publication January 29, 2007. |
As the worldwide community continues to expand, an emerging subpopulation of couples has begun experiencing a common problem in making their contribution to the populace. These couples are experiencing a major health crisis, commonly referred to as infertility. Infertility is classically defined as a state in which a couple desiring a child is unable to conceive following 12 months of unprotected intercourse (Seshagiri, 2001). It affects approximately 15% of couples who seek clinical treatment to conceive a child, and recent studies show that the number of infertile couples in the general population is growing (Feng, 2003). In infertile couples, responsibility for the lack of conception is generally divided into thirds, with one third due to male factors, one third due to female factors, and the final third due to overlapping factors from both partners.
The cornerstone of the evaluation of the man remains semen analysis. Although it gives some quantitative and qualitative information about the sperm sample, recent insight into the molecular biology and genetics of the sperm cell have demonstrated that morphology and motility alone are not the only grounds upon which sperm should be evaluated.
Commonly overlooked is the fact that sperm carry 2 different kinds of DNA. The nDNA, commonly called the genome, is located in the head of the sperm. The second DNA type is called the mtDNA and is responsible for delivering the sperm to the egg by providing ATP for cellular acceleration. Both types of DNA work toward the common goal of fertilization, but each is susceptible to a myriad of factors that could derail the fertilization process. Imperfections in both types of DNA contribute equally to the problem at hand. This article hopes to elucidate male factor infertility as contributed by both kinds of DNA.
Origins of nDNA Damage
nDNA in somatic cell nuclei is packaged into structures called nucleosomes.
These structures consist of a protein core formed by an octamer of histones
with 2 loops of wrapped DNA. The nucleosomes are then further coiled into
regular helixes called solenoids, which increase the volume of the chromatin
(Agarwal and Said, 2003). Sperm
nuclei, however, need to be packaged much differently and more compactly to
assure proper delivery of the nDNA.
There are believed to be 4 levels of organization for packaging spermatozoon nDNA (Sakkas et al, 1999; Agarwal and Said, 2003). One level consists of anchoring the chromosomes to the nuclear annulus. In another, DNA loop domains are created as the DNA attaches itself to the newly added nuclear matrix. The arrangement of these loop domains ensures that the DNA can be delivered to the egg in a form that is both physically and chemically accessible to the growing embryo. Chromosome repositioning and organization within the matrix of the sperm head is another level. Condensation of nDNA into tiny, supercoiled doughnuts called toroids by replacing the nuclear histones with structures called protamines completes the levels of chromosomal organization. Human sperm contain 2 types of protamines that are about half the size of typical histones; throughout evolution, they have increased the number of positively charged residues, allowing formation of a highly condensed complex with the negatively charged paternal genomic DNA. Also, the addition of cysteine residues allows the formation of disulfide bonds between adjacent protamine molecules, thereby strongly stabilizing the nucleo-protamine complex (Oliva, 2006).
Prior to this re-arrangement, recombination is essential for spermatogenesis to occur (Carrell et al, 2006); as seen in studies using animal knockout models, decreased recombination is associated with diminished spermatogenesis. Many factors (both endogenous and exogenous) can influence this, contributing to male infertility. Scientists agree on 4 distinct methods, although there may be others, by which nDNA can be compromised or damaged: defective sperm chromatin packaging, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and genetic lesions (Agarwal and Said, 2003; Sharma et al, 2004; Lewis and Aitken, 2005; Shafik et al, 2006). The effects of these damaging methods are often found to be interrelated.
Defective Chromatin Packaging
Chromatin packaging refers to the highly complex and specific structure
into which nDNA is folded to properly deliver the genetic information to the
egg. Although defects can arise at any of the 4 levels of packaging, the most
common problems arise during DNA loop domain formation and histone-protamine
replacement. nDNA loop domains can be difficult to arrange without inducing
endogenous nicks to the nDNA (Sakkas et
al, 1999). It is thought that these nicks exist naturally and
serve to relieve torsional stress. The presence of these nicks is greatest
during transition from round to elongated spermatids in the testis and occurs
before complete protamination within the sperm.
Topoisomerase II is the enzyme that creates and ligates the nicks within nDNA during this process (Sakkas et al, 1999; Henkel et al, 2004). Any defect in the enzyme itself will negatively affect the packaging of the genetic information and will contribute to male infertility. The enzyme may leave the nDNA fragmented with single- or double-stranded breaks; this may indicate an early apoptotic process in somatic cells and incomplete sperm maturation in the case of spermatozoa. Topoisomerase inhibitors have been proven to increase the levels of internal nDNA breaks by preventing their repair and increasing their susceptibility to damage (Lewis and Aitken, 2005).
Also involved in sperm chromatin packaging is the replacement of histones with protamines. Protamines are major DNA-binding proteins essential for chromatin condensation (Vogt, 2004). During epididymal transport, histones are replaced by transition proteins, only to be replaced by protamines (Oliva, 2006); both intermolecular and intramolecular disulfide cross-linking among the cysteine-rich protamines compresses the DNA into one sixth the volume occupied by somatic cell nDNA (Lewis and Aitken, 2005; Zini and Libman, 2006). This high rate of cross-linking affords the sperm nDNA a measure of protection against exogenous assault and compensates for an impaired DNA-repair capacity.
Human spermatozoa retain approximately 15% histones in their structure, leading to a less compact chromatin arrangement than in other mammals (Erenpreiss et al, 2006), perhaps to allow access for oocyte repair mechanisms. Human sperm contain 2 different types of protamines, which are believed to be present in equal amounts in fertile men: P1 and P2 (Carrell et al, 2007). Experiments have shown that the ratio of P1 to P2 is critical to male fertility (Vogt, 2004; Erenpreiss et al, 2006; Oliva, 2006; Carrell et al, 2007), more specifically to the sperm's fertilization ability (Aoki et al, 2006). In addition, recent testing has demonstrated that P2 precursors (pre-P2) are vital in maintaining the delicate P1:P2 ratio. Translation of pre-P2 mRNA appears to cause abnormal head morphogenesis, reduced sperm motility, and male infertility (Tseden et al, 2007). Also, low pre-P2:P2 ratios suggest a link between deficient protamine processing and decreased nDNA integrity (Torregrosa et al, 2006).
Apoptosis
Apoptosis is the controlled disassembly of a cell from within
(Henkel et al, 2004); it is
believed to have 2 roles during normal spermatogenesis
(Seli et al, 2004;
Sharma et al, 2004;
Spano et al, 2005). The first
role is to limit the germ cell population to numbers that can be supported by
the surrounding Sertoli cells. The second is for the depletion of abnormal
spermatozoa. As seen in the prior section, abnormal spermatozoa can be
produced via defective sperm chromatin packaging, among other ways. In somatic
cells, cells that enter into an apoptotic pathway usually have several
classical indicators, such as phosphatidylserine (PS) relocation, Fas
expression, nDNA strand breaks, and caspase activity.
PS relocation is perhaps the earliest indicator of apoptosis; normally located on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, PS migrates to the outer membrane once the apoptotic signal has been given (Henkel et al, 2004). To help control this signal, both pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins are present in the testis; they are members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins and provide a signaling pathway that is imperative to maintaining male germ cell homeostasis (Spano et al, 2005). Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL are both prosurvival proteins, while Bax is a pro-apoptotic protein. Disturbing the balance of these proteins from the Bcl-2 family has been demonstrated in mice to contribute to male infertility by disrupting normal apoptosis levels.
Fas expression is another indicator that the apoptosis signal has been given. Fas is a type I cell surface protein, belonging to the tumor necrosis/nerve growth factor receptor family (Henkel et al, 2004); it is induced by the binding of Fas ligand to the Fas receptor on the plasma outer membrane. Sertoli cells are known to express Fas ligand, demonstrating the fact that apoptosis is a commonly used mechanism to control the germ cell population at a level that can be supported by the Sertoli cells (Erenpreiss et al, 2006). Ligation of Fas ligand to the Fas receptor triggers activation of cytosolic aspartate-specific proteases, or simply caspases. Once caspase activation has taken place, a signal is transduced to synthesize caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease, which leads to DNA degradation by forming single- and double-stranded breaks within the nDNA (Agarwal and Said, 2003).
In infertile men, ejaculated spermatozoa often possess partially degraded nDNA, usually considered to be indicative of the apoptosis pathway; this "escaping" of the apoptosis signal is referred to as "abortive apoptosis" (Sakkas et al, 2002; Lewis and Aitken, 2005; Erenpreiss et al, 2006). The apoptotic pathway is an all or nothing response, meaning that once the signal has been given there is no reversing the process. Abnormalities in this pathway are often attributed to 1 of 2 possibilities: infertile men may not produce enough sperm to trigger Sertoli cell activation to produce Fas, or there may be a problem in activating the Fas-mediated apoptosis signal (Agarwal and Said, 2003). It is believed that if the apoptotic cascade is initiated at the round spermatid phase when transcription is still active, this may be the origin of the nDNA breaks commonly seen in abortive apoptosis in ejaculated spermatozoa. However, nDNA breaks are known to be common during condensation of the genome. It is currently unclear whether these breaks are caused by an aborted apoptotic pathway or simply by incomplete chromatin packaging. Also, not all caspase activity has been shown to be indicative of the apoptotic signal. Recent work has demonstrated that there appears to be some caspase activity in human germ cells that is not associated with apoptosis and may indeed serve a viable function (Martinez et al, 2002).
Another well-known inducer of the apoptotic pathway is telomere shortening. Telomeres are capping structures at chromosome ends that protect against re-arrangements, preventing ends from being recognized as nDNA breaks (Shafik et al, 2006). They are usually composed of tandem TTAGGG sequence repeats that are bound to a complex array of proteins. Telomerase is a specialized reverse transcriptase that contains a catalytic subunit that synthesizes new telomeric repeats. In the absence of telomerase, telomeric sequences are lost after each round of replication, eventually creating a shifted sequence that could be recognized as an nDNA double-stranded break; this would then be recognized by a genomic surveillance mechanism that appears in the elongating spermatid (Shafik et al, 2006). This recognition is another way to induce an apoptotic response, possibly contributing to the "abortive apoptosis" theory. Abortive apoptosis is a theory that still requires much scientific evidence to be considered valid. Because of naturally occurring processes within the spermatozoa that mimic somatic cell apoptosis, many believe that this theory requires additional evidence.
Oxidative Stress
Oxidative stress upon spermatozoa is induced by an increase in the amount
of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are present in the fluids filling the
male genital tract (Tesarik et al,
2006). Sperm are particularly susceptible to oxidative stress due
to the high content of unsaturated fatty acids in their membranes, as well as
their limited stores of antioxidant enzymes
(Baker and Aitken, 2005). Their
increased susceptibility is enhanced by defective chromatin packaging, causing
further damage to the genome; individuals with varicoceles are particularly
susceptible to this type of damage (Saleh
et al, 2003).
ROS are created by metabolizing ground-state oxygen into the superoxide anion and H2O2 (Vernet et al, 2001). They play an important physiologic role, modulating gene and protein activities vital to sperm proliferation, differentiation, and function (Erenpreiss et al, 2006). ROS also promote tyrosine phosphorylation to support sperm capacitation. Fertile men control ROS generation through seminal antioxidants; the pathogenic effects of ROS are apparent only when they are produced in excess of the antioxidant capabilities. It is known that the main source of excess ROS generation in semen is leukocytes; genital tract infections are considered to be the most common cause. However, secondary contributors are known to play an important role as well when an infection is not present. The origin of these secondary contributors has yet to be pinpointed in human sperm, but there are many sources under investigation.
Three possible sources of excess ROS generation are from within the human sperm itself. The first is through leakage of electrons from the mitochondrial transport chain (Vernet et al, 2001). This was proposed because of tests performed on rat spermatozoa indicating increased translocation of mitochondrial free radicals into the sperm genome. However, further investigation has demonstrated that mitochondrial blockers do not have the same effects on human spermatozoa (Erenpreiss et al, 2006). The second proposed source is through NADPH oxidase in sperm. This theoretic oxidase would serve to transfer electrons from NAD(P)H to ground-state oxygen to create the superoxide anion. It is known that NAD(P)H in leukocytes helps to contribute to ROS production in rat spermatozoa, but it has yet to be demonstrated in humans (Vernet et al, 2001; Baker and Aitken, 2005).
The third proposed intracellular source of ROS production is through the generation of nitric oxide (NO) (Balercia et al, 2004). NO is a free radical created from the oxidation of L-arginine by 3 isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NOS activity has been shown to be associated with the acrosome reaction and capacitation of mouse sperm, thus influencing their fertilizing potential. In humans, decreased NO concentrations are known to increase sperm capacitation and zona pellucida binding. The exact mechanism of its influence has yet to be elucidated.
Other proposed sources of ROS come from outside the sperm's immediate environment, usually from outside of the host's body. They include xenobiotic agents such as organophosphorous pesticides that disrupt the endocrine system. These agents possess estrogenic properties that are capable of inducing ROS production by male germ cells (Sanchez-Pena et al, 2004; Baker and Aitken, 2005). Cigarette smoking is also known to increase ROS levels through increased leukocyte generation. Infertile smokers are known to harbor increased levels of spermatid oxidative stress compared with infertile nonsmokers. This increase is associated with increased seminal leukocytes (Agarwal and Said, 2005). Finally, scrotal heat stress has been demonstrated in stallions to damage sperm chromatin structure, possibly by oxidative stressors (Love and Kenney, 1999). Recently similar analyses were performed on humans regarding the use of laptop computers in respect to elevated scrotal temperature (Sheynkin et al, 2005). These findings also recognized the elevated temperature of the scrotal environment as having a negative effect upon spermatogenesis, warranting further research.
Genetic Lesions
Genetic lesions are another possible means of attack through which nDNA can
influence male infertility; these lesions create insults or gaps within the
genome and may yield effects ranging from minimal to catastrophic. They can be
divided into 3 classes based on the type of impact they present
(Vogt, 2004). The first class
consists of chromosomal aneuploidies and rearrangements in which batteries of
genes on specific chromosomes have changes in expression dosages or changes in
their normal genomic environments. The second class embodies submicroscopic
deletions (microdeletions), in which deletions or rearrangements of multiple
genes mapped in a molecular environment have changes in their expression
patterns. The third class is made up of single gene defects in which
expression of a single gene (or key element) is changed or lost, causing male
infertility. These lesions can affect all of the human chromosomes, including
any of the 300 genes estimated to be involved in male fertility. They can
occur within introns as well as exons, making their impact difficult to
predict.
Paternal nDNA Effects
Prior to analyzing the second type of DNA found in spermatozoa, it is
important to establish that nDNA integrity, as it relates to embryo quality,
is still an intense topic of discussion. Paternal effects upon the embryo have
been classified as both "early" and "late." Early
paternal effects appear to be mediated by centrosome destruction or a
deficiency in oocyte-activating factors within the spermatozoa, implicating
faulty sperm chromatin packaging and nDNA damage
(Tesarik et al, 2002). Early
effects are observed before the major activation of embryonic genome
expression, which begins at the 4-cell stage in humans. Late paternal effects
may involve sperm aneuploidy, nDNA damage, or abnormal chromatin packaging,
which can influence the orderly activation of paternal gene expression
(Tesarik et al, 2004). It has
been found that there is no correlation between sperm nDNA fragmentation and
the early paternal effect; however, many assisted reproductive technology
(ART) clinics perform embryo transfers on the third day after embryo
retrieval, prior to the time when late paternal effects can be fully observed.
Because of this fact, blastocyst transfer may be preferable, at the risk of
having fewer eggs to transfer.
mtDNA
The mtDNA of a sperm is completely located in the sperm midpiece; it exists
as a circular, double-stranded DNA molecule composed of 16 569 base pairs
(Kao et al, 1998). The genetic
information encoded by the mtDNA consists of 2 ribosomal RNAs, 22 transfer
RNAs, and 13 polypeptides essential for mitochondrial respiration and
oxidative phosphorylation associated with the electron transport chain (ETC).
The most important function of the sperm mitochondria is to manufacture ATP.
The mitochondria itself is composed of 2 distinct membranes, an inner membrane
and an outer membrane. The outer membrane is relatively permissive and allows
the transit of large molecules through nonspecific porin channels; the inner
membrane is much more discriminatory. The inner membrane is heavily
invaginated and forms cristae; enzymes for the ETC are located on the inner
membrane, and the particular nature of inner membrane transport helps to
maintain the mitochondrial membrane potential, which drives the ETC
(St John et al, 2000b).
It is important to remember the differences between mtDNA and nDNA (O'Connell et al, 2002a). mtDNA is not afforded the same protection or basic upkeep that nDNA is given. First, there is no protection from histones or DNA-binding proteins within mtDNA; also it lacks introns. Because of this, every mutation in mtDNA has the potential to damage the function of the cell. mtDNA also lacks a significant proofreading system and replicates much more rapidly than nDNA; this causes the mutation rate found in mtDNA to be 10 to 100 times more than that of nDNA.
mtDNA Deletions
Because of the increased rate of occurrence, mitochondrial deletions have
been exclusively investigated; of particular interest has been the
relationship to sperm motility and forward progression. Deletions in the
mitochondrial genome would directly affect the sperm's ability to synthesize
ATP through the ETC. Direct correlations have been found involving mtDNA
deletions and decreased sperm motility
(Ruiz-Pesini et al, 1998;
O'Connell et al, 2002b). There
are 6 distinct respiratory chain complexes that are required for the ETC to
function properly (Ruiz-Pesini et al,
1998). Of them, all but complex II are encoded by the
mitochondrial genome; complex II is encoded by the nuclear genome and imported
to the inner membrane of the mitochondria
(O'Connell et al, 2003).
Dysfunctions in these complexes are considered direct indications of mtDNA
deletions.
Deletions have been found to fall into 2 categories: small and large scale. While some large-scale deletions appear to be found in fertile men and may be considered "common," they are usually associated with spermatozoa with low motility (Kao et al, 1998; St John et al, 2000b; St John et al, 2001; O'Connell et al, 2002b). Small-scale deletions, however, can be equally devastating. Deletions as small as 2 base pairs have been proven to insert a stop codon into the mtDNA sequence and truncate vital proteins to ETC function (Thangaraj et al, 2003). It is important to note that no single deletion has been found to be indicative of poor sperm quality (St John et al, 2001).
mtDNA deletions have also been compared to the ages of individuals seeking infertility treatment. Some authors argue that mtDNA deletions accumulate with increased age (St John et al, 2000b), while others have found that there is no significant correlation between the two (Kao et al, 1998). Epididymal and testicular mtDNA deletions have also been compared, suggesting that testicular sperm may be superior to epididymal sperm for use in ART (O'Connell et al, 2002a); however, recent publications suggest the opposite (Rodrigo et al, 2004; Buffat et al, 2006). Lastly, comparisons have been drawn between the incidence of nDNA deletions in combination with mtDNA deletions. Although results have only come out of a single laboratory, strong correlations between the 2 types of deletions have been found (O'Connell et al, 2002a; O'Connell et al, 2002b).
mtDNA Copy Number
The number of mtDNA molecules in a single spermatozoon is known as its
mtDNA copy number. mtDNA copy number is controlled by the down-regulation of
nuclear-encoded mitochondrial transcription factor A
(May-Panloup et al, 2003).
Laboratories have been trying to pinpoint the specific mtDNA copy number that
is considered normal for fertile men, but have had little success; reported
copy numbers for normal, fertile men range from 3.8 in 100% density layers
(May-Panloup et al, 2003) to
74.1 ± 2.0 in healthy men (Kao et
al, 2004) to 717 ± 394 in motile spermatozoa
(Diez-Sanchez et al, 2003).
These discrepancies are usually attributed to the method of analysis used or
the cross-hybridization of mitochondrial pseudogenes found in the nDNA. All
reports, however, appear to correlate on 1 important fact: progressive cells
possess fewer mtDNA copy numbers than do nonprogressive spermatozoa.
Mitochondrial DNA and Apoptosis
While nDNA rearrangements can be associated with any number of possible
abnormalities causing male infertility, mtDNA injury is most often attributed
to the apoptotic pathway. Mitochondrial membrane potential is a measurable
factor that has been used to predict the spermatozoa's risk for apoptosis
(Marchetti et al, 2002). There
is an ongoing debate over the cause and effect of apoptotic signaling in
mitochondria. In other words, does the sperm mitochondria respiratory system
contribute to the ROS environment, causing apoptosis, or does the increased
ROS environment cause mitochondrial respiratory failure?
The first theory is supported by the fact that the mitochondrial respiratory system is a substantial producer of intracellular free radicals that might be able to escape the mitochondria and influence the production of ROS (O'Connell et al, 2003). Proposed free radical generation by mitochondrial involvement has been explained by Ozawa's hypothesis (St John et al, 2000b). This hypothesis outlines a "viscous cycle" whereby mtDNA deletions cause the mitochondria to deprive the sperm of ATP, inducing an energy crisis within the spermatozoa; as the cellular demand for ATP continues, the acceleration of electron leakage associated with ROS generation is increased. This cycle will continue, having catastrophic results and eventually concluding with the spermatozoa entering the apoptotic pathway (Kao et al, 1998).
The latter theory, indicating that the ROS environment causes mitochondrial respiratory failure, is supported by the idea that the appearance of mtDNA damage can be seen before any other indications of the apoptosis pathway (Donnelly et al, 2000). The first signs of stress induced by increased ROS levels are seen in the disruption of the mitochondrial membrane potential (Marchetti et al, 2002). In addition, structural evidence implies that the location of the mitochondria within the sperm midpiece leaves these structures in closest proximity to the stressors of increased ROS levels (O'Connell et al, 2002b). Because of mtDNA's lack of DNA protection, this implies that these DNA molecules would be the first to be damaged. Although both theories have substantial support, further research is necessary to distinguish the cause and effect pathway.
Elimination of Paternal Mitochondria by the Egg
It is well known that mitochondrial inheritance is of maternal origin
(O'Connell et al, 2003);
however, the pathway by which paternal mitochondria are eliminated is still
debated. A few existing theories involve paternal mtDNA dilution within the
fertilized egg or oxidative damage to the entering paternal mtDNA as possible
explanations for maternal mtDNA dominance. The most plausible theory involves
the ubiquitination of the paternal mtDNA
(Sutovsky et al, 2003).
Ubiquitination is a process through which a ubiquitin tag is attached to a
protein molecule, imprinting it for destruction.
The protein molecule within paternal mitochondria most commonly believed to be ubiquitinated is prohibin (Sutovsky et al, 2000; Sutovsky et al, 2003), which is an evolutionarily conserved, 30-kd integral protein of the inner mitochondrial membrane that is expressed during spermatogenesis as well as after fertilization. Studies demonstrate that prohibin is ubiquitinated by the spermatozoa itself and is already destined for destruction before it even fertilizes the egg. Upon fertilization, prohibin would encounter the egg's cytoplasmic destruction machinery, recognizing the ubiquitin tag, and would eliminate the mtDNA. This theory is further supported by the fact that when gel electrophoresis is performed upon mature spermatozoa mtDNA, there exists 3 distinct bands for the protein prohibin: 1 at the predicted 30-kd location and 2 others in the range of 47 to 50 kd, possibly signifying the phosphorylation of the protein in preparation for the attachment of the ubiquitin tag (Sutovsky et al, 2000).
Recent evidence, however, disputes the ubiquitin tag hypothesis in the elimination of paternal mtDNA (Hayashida et al, 2005). A protein known as t-tpis, located in the testis and involved in spermatogenesis (full function unknown), has been given special attention due to its involvement in a vital Tom complex within the mitochondria of spermatozoa. Tom complexes are translocators of the mitochondrial outer membrane. T-tpis is found to be expressed solely in the midpiece of spermatozoa, linking it to possible mitochondrial function. Further investigation has revealed that t-tpis is a protein member of the Tom complex assembled using Tom 22 and Tom 40 complexes; they are known to be required for cell viability and are localized on the cytosolic side of the mitochondrial outer membrane. A potential "knob and key-hole" model involving t-tpis expression has been proposed as a possible way of paternal mitochondrial recognition and elimination.
Contrary evidence of exclusive maternal mitochondrial inheritance comes from abnormal embryos that failed to eliminate paternal mtDNA; however, these embryos frequently fail to develop past the blastocyst stage (St John et al, 2000a). In the rare event that paternal mtDNA is observed in adults (Quintana-Murci et al, 2001; Schwartz and Vissing, 2002; Bandelt et al, 2005), recombination events are often attributed to this phenomenon. Nonetheless, it is generally more accurate to consider artificial recombination (ie, errors in testing) before considering actual recombination events to have occurred.
Treatment of Sperm DNA for Better ART Outcomes
Unfortunately, there is no treatment for mtDNA deficiencies; instead,
scientists have focused upon ways in which to isolate sperm with improved nDNA
status, as well as selecting better sperm for ART use to generate better ART
outcomes. The first method of treatment involves cessation of all activities
that are known to be harmful to the production of healthy sperm; this includes
smoking and exposure to possible environmental estrogens, such as pesticides
(Agarwal and Said, 2003). This
is usually accompanied by oral antioxidant treatment at least 2 months prior
to ART treatment in an attempt to minimize oxidative stress
(Tesarik et al, 2006).
Another suggested line of treatment is the use of surgically retrieved testicular spermatozoa instead of epididymal sperm. The reason to use testicular sperm is to minimize sperm with fragmented nDNA and obtain specimens with better mtDNA for use with in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures (Tesarik et al, 2006). However, recent evidence suggests the exact opposite, indicating epididymal sperm to be superior to testicular sperm for ICSI outcome (Rodrigo et al, 2004; Buffat et al, 2006). Also, a high-magnification optical system can be used to select better spermatozoa for ICSI. In this way, spermatozoa can be selected by visualizing morphology under conditions not possible with normal laboratory equipment. Subtle morphologic abnormalities become visible under this high magnification (6600x) that cannot be seen under normal high power objectives (400x), allowing the embryologist to select better sperm for ICSI fertilization (Tesarik and Mendoza, 2007).
Other ways to improve sperm nDNA include enhanced preparation techniques. This involves lowering the centrifugal forces exerted on the sperm when concentrating it and removing leukocytes as quickly as possible from the sample. Also the swim-up technique can be used to avoid use of the centrifuge. It is postulated that the addition of sperm wash medium to raw semen prior to liquefaction may inhibit bacterial binding to the sperm surface as well as diminish nDNA damage caused by ROS (Agarwal and Said, 2003). Oddly, in vitro culture of surgically retrieved testicular spermatozoa for 48 to 72 hours at 37°C has been suggested to improve motility, along with decreasing the proportion of spermatozoa containing single-stranded nDNA breaks (Emiliani et al, 2001).
Very recently, a novel sperm selection assay has been proposed to select viable sperm free of chromosomal anomalies for use with ICSI. Sperm hyaluronic acid (HA) binding has demonstrated the ability to isolate mature, viable sperm with unreacted acrosomal status, without damaging the specimen (Huszar et al, 2003). One principle of this assay lies in the expression of the chaperone protein HspA2; in spite of its key role in meiosis, HspA2 levels have become indicative of sperm maturation (Jakab et al, 2005). Low levels of HspA2 expression are associated with diminished sperm maturity, increased frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies, presence of apoptotic processes, and fragmented nDNA. The second principle involved takes into account remodeling of the cytoplasmic and membrane-specific biochemical markers, facilitating the formation of sperm binding sites for the zona pellucida of oocytes and for the binding sites of HA. Immature sperm that fail to undergo membrane remodeling are unable to bind to immobilized HA and will not be selected in this assay (Jakab et al, 2005). Chromosomal disomies are said to be reduced between fourfold and fivefold in HA-selected sperm compared with semen sperm (Huszar et al, 2006), indicating that HA preferentially selects for chromosomally normal sperm.
Because of such promising results, a kit for this assay has become commercially available. The sperm-hyaluronan binding assay (HBA) has been marketed for routine testing of sperm motility and fertility (Ye et al, 2006). Unfortunately, HBA results have fallen well short of expectations in predicting successful fertilization rates in IVF, demonstrating less significance than sperm morphology and limiting its clinical predictive value. Further research is needed to perfect techniques that will be employed to improve the quality of spermatozoa that are selected for use in all ART techniques to improve outcomes.
Summary
This article has established that sperm DNA integrity is both extremely
fragile and exceedingly important for male fertility. The 2 types of DNA
appear to be distinct and independently packaged molecules; however, research
has demonstrated the symbiotic nature of these structures in contributing to
male infertility. Data must continue to be gathered to establish strong
correlations between traditional semen analysis parameters and sperm DNA
integrity; this information remains controversial and useless in clinical
practice until new techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of sperm DNA can
be established. More modern technology must be employed to correlate such
information into useful clinical knowledge.
References
Agarwal A, Said TM. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in male infertility: a clinical approach. Br J Urol Int. 2005; 95: 503 –507.
Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA
damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003; 9: 331
–345.
Aoki VW, Liu L, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Gibson M, Peterson CM, Carrell DT. Sperm protamine1/protamine 2 ratios are related to in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and predictive of fertilization ability. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 1408 –1415.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baker MA, Aitken RJ. Reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa: methods for monitoring and significance for the origins of genetic disease and infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrin. 2005; 3: 67 –75.[CrossRef]
Balercia G, Moretti S, Vignini A, Magagnini M, Mantero F, Boscaro
M, Ricciardo-Lamonica G, Mazzanti L. Role of nitric oxide concentrations on
human sperm motility. J Androl. 2004; 25: 245
–249.
Bandelt H-J, Kong Q-P, Parson W, Salas A. More evidence for
non-maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA? J Med
Genet. 2005;42: 957
–960.
Buffat C, Patrat C, Merlet F, Guibert J, Epelboin S, Thiounn N,
Vieillefond A, Adda-Lievin A, Lebon C, Jouannet P. ICSI outcomes in
obstructive azoospermia: influence of the origin of surgically retrieved
spermatozoa and the cause of obstruction. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 1018
–1024.
Carrell DT, De Jonge C, Lamb DJ. The genetics of male infertility: a field of study whose time is now. Arch Androl. 2006; 52: 269 –274.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carrell DT, Emery BR, Hammoud S. Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jan 5; [Epub ahead of print].
Diez-Sanchez C, Ruiz-Pesini E, Lapena AC, Montoya J, Perez-Martos
A, Enriquez JA, Lopez-Perez MJ. Mitochondrial DNA content of human
spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2003; 68: 180
–185.
Donnelly E, O'Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SEM. Differences in
nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared
human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1552
–1561.
Emiliani S, Van den Bergh M, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Verdoot M,
Englert Y. Evidence of reduced single-stranded testicular sperm DNA from
obstructive azoospermic men after 3 days of in-vitro culture. Hum
Reprod. 2001;16: 1200
–1203.
Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl. 2006; 8: 11 –29.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feng HL. Molecular biology of male infertility. Arch Androl. 2003;49: 19 –27.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hayashida K, Omagari K, Masuda JI, Hazama H, Kadokawa Y, Ohba K, Kohno S. The sperm mitochondria-specific translocator has a key role in maternal mitochondrial inheritance. Cell Biol Int. 2005; 28: 472 –481.
Henkel R, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C, Mehnert C, Menkveld R, Gips H, Schill WB, Kruger T. Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81: 965 –972.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huszar G, Celik-Ozenci C, Cayli S, Zavaczki Z, Hansch E, Vigue L. Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity, viability, and unreacted acrosomal status. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: S1616 –S1624.[CrossRef]
Huszar G, Ozkavukcu S, Jakab A, Celik-Ozenci C, Sati GL, Cayli S. Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 18: 260 –267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jakab A, Sakkas D, Delpiano E, Cayli S, Kovanci E, Ward D, Ravelli A, Huszar G. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2005;84: 1665 –1673.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kao SH, Chao HT, Liu HW, Liao TL, Wei YH. Sperm mitochondrial DNA depletion in men with asthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82: 66 –73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kao SH, Chao HT, Wei YH. Multiple deletions of mitochondrial DNA
are associated with the decline of motility and fertility of human
spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998; 4: 657
–666.
Lewis SEM, Aitken RJ. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 2005; 322: 33 –41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Love CC, Kenney RM. Scrotal heat stress induces altered sperm
chromatin structure associated with a decrease in protamines disulfide bonding
in the stallion. Biol Reprod. 1999; 60: 615
–620.
Marchetti C, Obert G, Deffosez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P. Study
of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA
fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm.
Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1257
–1265.
Martinez F, Rienzi L, Iacobelli M, Ubaldi F, Mendoza C, Greco E,
Tesarik J. Caspase activity in preimplantation human embryos is not associated
with apoptosis. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1584
–1590.
May-Panloup P, Chretien M-F, Savagner F, Vasseur C, Jean M,
Malthiery Y, Reynier P. Increased sperm mitochondrial DNA content in male
infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 550
–556.
O'Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SEM. A comparison of mitochondrial
and nuclear DNA status in testicular sperm from fertile men and those with
obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2002b; 17: 1571
–1577.
O'Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SEM. Mitochondrial DNA deletions and
nuclear DNA fragmentation in testicular and epididymal human sperm.
Hum Reprod. 2002a; 17: 1565
–1570.
O'Connell M, McClure N, Powell LA, Steele EK, Lewis SEM. Differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA status of high-density and low-density sperm fractions after density gradient preparation. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79(supp1): 754 –762.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum Reprod
Update. 2006;12: 417
–435.
Quintana-Murci L, Rotig A, Munnich A, Rustin P, Bourgeron T.
Mitochondrial DNA inheritance in patients with deleted mtDNA. J Med
Genet. 2001;38: e28
.
Rodrigo L, Rubio C, Mateu E, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A,
GilSalom M. Analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in testicular and epididymal
spermatozoa from azoospermic ICSI patients by fluorescence in-situ
hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 118
–123.
Ruiz-Pesini E, Diez C, Lapena AC, Perez-Martos A, Montoya J,
Alvarez E, Arenas J, Lopez-Perez MJ. Correlation of sperm motility with
mitochondrial enzymatic activities. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 1616
–1620.
Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod. 1999;4: 31 –37.[Abstract]
Sakkas D, Moffatt O, Manicardi GC, Mariethoz E, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro
D. Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possible
involvement of apoptosis. Biol Reprod. 2002; 66: 1061
–1067.
Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Said TM, Sikka SC, Thomas AJ. Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 1431 –1436.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanchez-Pena LC, Reyes BE, Lopez-Carrillo L, Recio R, Moran-Martinez J, Cebrian ME, Quintanilla-Vega B. Organophosphorous pesticide exposure alters sperm chromatin structure in Mexican agricultural workers. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2004; 196: 108 –113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwartz M, Vissing J. Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA.
N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 576
–580.
Seli E, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Moffatt O, Sakkas D. Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82: 378 –383.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seshagiri PB. Molecular insight into the causes of male infertility. J Biosci. 2001; 24(supp): 429 –435.
Shafik A, Shafik AA, Shafik I, El Sibai O. Sperm DNA fragmentation. Arch Androl. 2006; 52: 197 –208.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sharma RK, Said T, Agarwal A. Sperm DNA damage and its clinical relevance in assessing reproductive outcome. Asian J Androl. 2004;6: 139 –148.[Medline]
Sheynkin Y, Jung M, Yoo P, Schulsinger D, Komaroff E. Increase in
scrotal temperature in laptop computer users. Human
Reprod. 2005;20: 452
–455.
Spano M, Seli E, Bizzaro D, Manicardi GC, Sakkas D. The significance of sperm nuclear DNA strand breaks on reproductive outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 17: 255 –260.[Medline]
St John J, Sakkas D, Dimitriadi K, Barnes A, Maclin V, Ramey J, Barratt C, De Jonge C. Failure of elimination of paternal mitochondrial DNA in abnormal embryos. Lancet. 2000a; 355: 200 .[Medline]
St John JC, Sakkas D, Barratt CLR. A role for mitochondrial DNA and sperm survival. J Androl. 2000b; 21: 189 –199.[Medline]
St John JC, Jokhi RP, Barratt CLR. Men with
oligoasthenoteratozoospermia harbour higher numbers of multiple mitochondrial
DNA deletions in their spermatozoa, but individual deletions are not
indicative of overall aetology. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001; 7: 103
–111.
Sutovsky P, Moreno RD, Ramalho-Santos J, Dominko T, Simerly C,
Schatten G. Ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria, selective proteolysis, and the
regulation of mitochondrial inheritance in mammalian embryos. Biol
Reprod. 2000;63: 582
–590.
Sutovsky P, Van Leyen K, McCauley T, Day BN, Sutovsky M. Degradation of paternal mitochondria after fertilization: implications for heteroplasmy, assisted reproductive technologies and mtDNA inheritance. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003; 8: 24 –33.
Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C. Late, but not early, paternal effect
on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation.
Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 611
–615.
Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. Paternal effects acting during the
first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI.
Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 184
–189.
Tesarik J, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza C. Sperm nuclear DNA damage: update on the mechanism, diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12: 715 –721.[Medline]
Tesarik J, Mendoza C. Treatment of severe male infertility by micromanipulation-assisted fertilization: an update. Front Biosci. 2007;12: 105 –114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thangaraj K, Joshi MB, Reddy AG, Rasalkar AA, Singh L. Sperm
mitochondrial mutations as a cause of low sperm motility. J
Androl. 2003;24: 388
–392.
Torregrosa N, Dominguez-Fandos D, Camejo MI, Shirley CR, Meistrich
ML, Ballesca JL, Oliva R. Protamine 2 precursors, protamine 1/protamine 2
ratio, DNA integrity and other sperm parameters in infertile patients.
Human Reprod. 2006; 21: 2084
–2089.
Tseden K, Topaloglu O, Meinhardt A, Dev A, Adham I, Muller C, Wolf S, Bohm D, Schluter G, Engel W, Nayernia K. Premature translation of transition protein 2 mRNA causes sperm abnormalities and male infertility. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007; 74: 273 –279.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vernet P, Fulton N, Wallace C, Aitken RJ. Analysis of reactive
oxygen species generating systems in rat epididymal spermatozoa.
Biol Reprod. 2001; 65: 1102
–1113.
Vogt PH. Molecular genetics of human male infertility: from genes to new therapeutic perspectives. Curr Pharm Design. 2004; 10: 471 –500.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ye H, Huang G, Gao Y, Liu DY. Relationship between human
spermhyaluronan binding assay and fertilization rate in conventional in vitro
fertilization. Human Reprod. 2006; 21: 1545
–1550.
Zini A, Libman J. Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the
era of assisted reproduction. CMAJ. 2006; 175: 495
–500.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
