| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your journal has published a review by Çayan et al
(2009) on varicocele repair in
infertile men. The primary aim of varicocele treatment for subfertility is
pregnancy, but no data about live birth rate were available for any of the
studies analyzed. This gap has been pointed out by other reviews
(Schlegel, 1997;
Evers and Collins, 2003) and a
search on PubMed, using varicocele (3727 titles) and miscarriage/abortion
keywords, resulted in only 1 study
(Lukkarinen et al, 1997) on 26
infertile men. These investigators declared 8 spontaneous pregnancies after
varicocele repair, with 2 miscarriages. In an attempt to understand the
miscarriage rate after varicocele repair, we have retrieved data on 389
infertile couples from our database (October 2005–January 2009; women,
median age 34.5 years [range 19.1–41 years]; men, median age 36.5 years
[range, 24.1–53.4 years]). All men had some semen anomaly and varicocele
surgically corrected, while waiting for assisted reproductive procedures.
Diagnosis of varicocele was based on clinical examination and on basal venous
reflux in the upright position. All couples respected classic inclusion
criteria for male and female pathologies. The follow-up (SE 18.9 ± 0.46
months [range, 9–40 months]) was conducted by chart review and telephone
calls/e-mail. One hundred seventeen spontaneous pregnancies were achieved
(30%). The spontaneous pregnancy rate results were significantly higher in
women aged <35 years (74 of 207; 35.7%) than in women aged
35 years (43
of 182; 23.6%; Fisher's exact test, P = .01). Ten miscarriages
(<12 weeks) out of 74 pregnancies (13.5%) were recorded in the younger
group vs 8 out of 43 (18.6%) in the older group (NS). Therefore, the live
birth rates after varicocele repair are 30.9% in women aged <35 years and
19.2% in women aged
35 years (P = .01). In conclusion, the
miscarriage rate (<12 weeks) after varicocele repair is about 15%, very
similar to that observed in the general population
(Nybo Andersen et al, 2000).
This should be taken into consideration in future reviews or meta-analyses
dealing with varicocele repair outcome.
References
Çayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadio
lu A. Treatment of
palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best
technique. J Androl. 2009; 30: 33
–40.
Evers JL, Collins JA. Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003; 361: 1849 –1852.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lukkarinen O, Hellström P, Leinonen S, Juntunen K. Is varicocele treatment useful? Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1997; 86: 40 –44.[Medline]
Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M.
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study.
BMJ. 2000;320: 1708
–1712.
Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology. 1997;49: 83 –90.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |