Journal of Andrology Testis Workshop 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print December 3, 2009, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.109.009266
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 31, No. 3, May/June 2010
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.109.009266

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/235    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.

Minireview

Roles of Androgen Receptor in Male and Female Reproduction: Lessons From Global and Cell-Specific Androgen Receptor Knockout (ARKO) Mice

XINCHANG ZHOU

From The Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Correspondence to: Dr Xinchang Zhou, The Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa, 5270 CBRB, Iowa City, IA 52242 (e-mail: xinchang-zhou{at}uiowa.edu).
Received for publication September 3, 2009; accepted for publication November 9, 2009.

Abstract

The androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is a ligand-dependent transcription factor involved in regulating expression of an array of androgen-responsive genes. AR-mediated androgen actions play the important roles in male and female reproductive development and function. AR mutations can cause a diverse range of diseases, such as testicular feminization mutation (Tfm) syndrome, prostate cancer, and Kennedy's disease. However, because of a lack of genetic models, the molecular mechanisms involved in the physiological and pathological effects of androgen–AR function in male and female reproductive health remains largely unknown. To get a better insight into the molecular working mechanisms of the AR, a global and several cell-specific conditional knockout mouse models have been developed. These models are reviewed here, and the phenotypes of the different cell-specific androgen receptor knockout (ARKO) mice are compared with those of the global ARKO mice.

     Key words: Nuclear receptor, conditional knockout, phenotype



The androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, plays important roles in male reproductive functions, as well as female folliculogenesis (Donath et al, 1997) and breast development (Liao et al, 2002). The AR gene comprises eight exons that encode a 110-kd protein that contains an N-terminal transactivation domain, a central DNA-binding domain, and a C-terminal ligand-binding domain (Chang et al, 1995). Testosterone and its more potent metabolite, dihydrotestosterone, can bind AR, and the ligand-bound AR forms homodimers and interacts with many coregulators to modulate androgen target genes (Heinlein and Chang, 2002). AR dysfunction causes a diverse range of clinical disorders, such as testicular feminization mutation (Tfm) syndrome, prostate cancer, and Kennedy's disease (La Spada et al, 1991; Griffin, 1992; Quigley et al, 1995; Choong and Wilson, 1998; McPhaul, 1999). In addition to men, the Tfm syndrome has been described in other species, such as the dog (Schultz, 1962), rat (Bardin et al, 1970), mouse (Lyon and Hawkes, 1970; Goldstein and Wilson, 1972), and cat (Meyers-Wallen et al, 1989). However, the molecular basis of the AR function underlying these AR-related disorders remains to be elucidated because of the lack of stable genetic models.

Because male mice lacking a functional AR gene are expected to be similar to Tfm male mice with infertility (Quigley et al, 1995; McPhaul, 1999), a successfully disrupted AR gene, essential for male reproduction, is not passed on to the next generation. Furthermore, because all Tfm model animals are genetically male, it is impossible to generate homozygous females with AR gene mutation genetically (Matsumoto et al, 2003). Therefore, it is impractical to generate an androgen receptor knockout (ARKO) mouse line by either breeding or classical gene KO methods. To generate ARKO mice, a Cre-loxP strategy for conditional KO is necessary. The Cre-loxP system uses the expression of P1 phage Cre to catalyze the excision of DNA located between flanking loxP sites. This strategy differs from the standard targeted disruption procedure in that embryonic stem cells are generated in which the target segment is not disrupted but is flanked by loxP sites (floxed). The targeted gene thus functions normally, and mice can be bred to homozygosity for the targeted locus.

The recent global AR knockout male mice showed Tfm syndrome, exhibiting infertility and female-typical external appearance with a blind-end vagina and a clitoris-like phallus. Testes were located in abdominal or inguinal region, and germ cell development was severely disrupted (Yeh et al, 2002; Matsumoto et al, 2003). The global female ARKO mice displayed subfertility with retarded development of mammary glands (Yeh et al, 2002; Yeh et al, 2003; Hu et al, 2004). These findings further emphasized the AR signaling necessary for male external and internal phenotypes, and female ovary and breast development. Because a gene alteration in the whole body can cause a complex phenotype that makes it difficult to differentiate direct effects in a particular tissue or cell type from those secondary effects arising from a gene change in other cell types, it is necessary to use a Cre-lox strategy in transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase selectively in specific cells to generate a cell-specific ARKO mouse model in which disruption of AR function is exclusively in a particular cell type. Here, we summarize the generation and phenotypes of both the global and cell-specific AR knockout (AR–/y) in germ cells (G-AR–/y), peritubular myoid cells (PM-AR–/y), Leydig cells (L-AR–/y), Sertoli cells (S-AR–/y), and prostate epithelial cell (PEARKO) mouse models to understand the consequences of AR loss in different cell types.

Generation of Global and Cell-Specific ARKO Mice

To generate global or cell-specific ARKO mice, the C57-B6/129/SvEv loxP-floxed AR mice were first produced (Yeh et al, 2002, Matsumoto et al, 2003) and then mated with mice expressing Cre recombinase ubiquitously or selectively in specific cells. Global ARKO mice were generated by mating the floxed AR mice with the transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing Cre driven by the strong β-actin (ACTB) promoter (Yeh et al, 2002), human cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (Matsumoto et al, 2003), or phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter (Ophoff et al, 2009). Sertoli cell–specific ARKO (S-AR–/y) mice were generated by mating the floxed AR mice with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)-Cre transgenic mice (Chang et al, 2004; De Gendt et al, 2004; Holdcraft and Braun, 2004a). Leydig cell–specific ARKO (L-AR–/y) mice were generated by mating the floxed AR mice with AMH type II receptor (AMHRII)–Cre transgenic mice (Xu et al, 2007). PM cell–specific ARKO (PM-AR–/y) mice were generated by mating the floxed AR mice with Transgelin-Cre transgenic mice (Zhang et al, 2006). Germ cell–specific ARKO (G-AR–/y) mice were generated by mating the floxed AR mice with synaptonemal complex protein 1 (Sycp1)–Cre transgenic mice (Tsai et al, 2006). Prostate epithelial ARKO (PEARKO) mice are produced by Cre recombinase under the control of the PEARKO–specific probasin gene promoter (Simanainen et al, 2007; Niu et al, 2008).

Phenotypes of Global and Cell-Specific ARKO Mice

     Phenotypes of Global ARKO Mice— Phenotypes of the global ARKO male mice. The early differentiation of male accessory sex organs is dependent on testosterone during early embryonic development when 5{alpha} reductase does not yet exist; the major effect of testosterone directs the differentiation of male-specific Wolffian duct–derived internal genital structures at early embryonic stages, including the epididymis, vas deferens, and seminal vesicles (Wilson et al, 1981; Tong et al, 1996; Hutson et al, 1997). However, dihydroxytestosterone (DHT)-dependent development of the prostate and prostatic urethra occurs internally, and the differentiation of genital structures externalizes at later embryonic developmental stages, when the 5{alpha} reductase responsible for conversion of testosterone to DHT is available (Quigley, 1998). If the AR fails to activate its target genes in the presence of androgens during these critical stages, severe defects in male sex differentiation and phenotype development ensue. Global ARKO males (Figure 1) were infertile and had a female-like appearance, including a short genito-anal distance, vagina with a blind end, and clitoris-like phallus instead of a penis and scrotum. The vas deferens, epididymis, seminal vesicle, and prostate were all absent in ARKO males. However, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and uteri were not observed, although small abdominal or inguinal testes were present, similar to Tfm mice or humans with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (Yeh et al, 2002; Matsumoto et al, 2003). The external genitalia in male ARKO mice appeared feminized. The penis seemed microphallic, and the urethra showed hypospadia. The scrotum was poorly developed and looked like the labia majora in the female. Histological examination of the testes showed that spermatogenesis was severely arrested at pachytene spermatocytes. From these results, it was clear that AR was essential for the development of male reproductive organs and spermatogenesis, although it was not required for the formation of testes.


Figure 1
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Phenotype of 8-week-old male androgen receptor knockout (ARKO) mice. Six 8-week-old male ARKO mice were killed. The results were always compared among siblings. (A) The external genitalia of male ARKO, wild-type (wt) male, and wt female. (B, C) The internal genitalia of male ARKO and wt male mice. Arrows in B identify the testis. (D) The testes of wt male and ARKO mice. Originally published in Yeh et al (2002; Copyright 2002, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A). Color figure is available online at www.andrologyjournal.org.

 
Phenotypes of the global ARKO female mice. Androgens are primarily produced by theca cells in response to luteinizing hormone (LH) in female ovaries. Although androgen receptors (ARs) are expressed in granulosa cells, stromal cells (Schreiber and Ross, 1976; Hirai et al, 1994; Tetsuka et al, 1995), theca cells (Horie et al, 1992), and oocytes (Szoltys and Slomczynska, 2000; Cardenas et al, 2002; Gill et al, 2004), the roles of AR-mediated actions in female reproductive physiology remains unclear. Previous studies have revealed that androgens played a positive role in the early stage of folliculogenesis (Vendola et al, 1998; Weil et al, 1999), but other studies (Vendola et al, 1999; Hickey et al, 2005) suggested that this effect could be mediated by way of growth factor signal pathways instead of the AR-mediated pathway. Global ARKO female mice (Figure 2) appeared normal but had longer oestrous cycles and reduced fertility (Yeh et al, 2002; Hu et al, 2004; Shiina et al, 2006; Walters et al, 2007), evident in the delayed production of their first litter and the reduced average number of the pups per litter. Heterozygous females exhibited an age-dependent reduction in pups per litter compared with wild-type females, indicating a significant gene dosage effect of AR on female fertility (Walters et al, 2007). The ovaries from mature ARKO females exhibited a marked reduction in the number of corpora lutea (Hu et al, 2004; Walters et al, 2007) and oocytes recovered from naturally mated ARKO females (Walters et al, 2007). Furthermore, the defective conformation of the cumulus cell–oocyte complex from ARKO females implies a lower fertilization capability of ARKO oocytes. However, early embryo development to the 2-cell stage was unaltered (Walters et al, 2007). Global ARKO female mice also showed the retarded development of mammary glands (Yeh et al, 2003; Shiina et al, 2006), with reduced ductal branching in the prepubertal stages and fewer Cap cells in the terminal end buds. Adult females also showed decreased lobuloalveolar development and fewer milk-producing alveoli in the lactating glands, maybe because of defects in insulin-like growth factor I–insulin-like growth factor I receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signals, as well as estrogen receptor (ER) activity. In addition, AR-mediated actions also have a distinct role in the regulation of uterine development, because the loss of AR in ARKO female mice predisposes the uterus to aberrant uterine growth (Walters et al, 2009). Taken together, these data provide in vivo evidence showing that AR plays an important role in the normal development and functions of ovaries, uteri, and breasts in females.


Figure 2
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Morphological comparison of ovaries from androgen receptor (AR)+/+ and AR–/– females. (A, B) Ovaries from 4-week-old AR+/+ and AR–/– females were histologically similar. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of the follicular compartments in AR+/+ and AR–/– ovaries (n = 2). (D, E) The ovaries from sexually mature, 16-week-old AR+/+ females, compared with their AR–/– counterparts. The granulosa layers in the antral follicles were locally thin (open arrowheads) in the AR–/– ovaries, whereas they were even in thickness in the AR+/+ ovaries (arrows). An asterisk marks the zona pellucida remnants. (F) Statistical analysis of the number of the follicular compartments in AR+/+ and AR–/– ovaries (n = 3 for each genotype). Statistical significance determined by using Student's unpaired and two-tailed t test is indicated. Representative sections are shown. P indicates primordial and primary follicle; PF, preantral follicle; APF, atretic primordial, primary, and preantral follicle; A, antral follicle; AF, atretic antral follicle; CL, corpus luteum. Scale bar = 200 µm. Originally published in Hu et al, 2004 (Copyright 2004, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A). Color figure available online at www.andrologyjournal.org.

 

     Phenotypes of Cell-Specific ARKO Mice— Phenotypes of Sertoli cell–selective ARKO mice. Sertoli cells are generally believed to be the primary mediators of androgen regulation of spermatogenesis because they provide physical and nutritional support to developing germ cells (Griswold, 1998). The hypothesis was examined by three Sertoli cell–specific ARKO (S-AR–/y) groups (Chang et al, 2004; De Gendt et al, 2004; Holdcraft and Braun, 2004a). In contrast to global ARKO mice, results from S-AR–/y mice showed a normal external male appearance with normal internal male genital tract development. S-AR–/y males (Figure 3) have fully descended testes, but size is markedly reduced. S-AR–/y testis histologically showed a decrease in diameter of seminiferous tubules and reduced germ cell complement compared with wild-type male littermates. Poor germ cell differentiation, with the majority of germ cell maturation ceasing at the diplotene primary spermatocyte stage, was seen in the seminiferous tubules of S-AR–/y mice (Chang et al, 2004). Occasionally, a few secondary spermatocytes occur, and very few round spermatids exist (De Gendt et al, 2004; Holdcraft and Braun, 2004a), in agreement with earlier studies, in which androgens and AR play an important role in Sertoli cell maturation rather than Sertoli cell proliferation. Some studies (De Gendt et al, 2004; Tan et al, 2005) showed that adult S-AR–/y mice develop nearly normal numbers of Sertoli cells compared with the wild-type male control, indicating that the effect of androgens on the number of Sertoli cells is not mediated by the AR signal pathway. More detailed analysis of the S-AR–/y testes revealed that androgen, acting through the Sertoli cell AR, regulates the microenvironment of the seminiferous epithelium by influencing a broad spectrum of gene changes in Sertoli cells (Denolet et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2006; Eacker et al, 2007). These results showed that loss of Sertoli cell–specific AR function could impair the normal supportive function for movement of developing germ cells, the junction complex formation and basement membrane development of Sertoli cells or the functional integrity of the blood–testis barrier, and Sertoli cell nursery functions for developing germ cells (Denolet et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2006). Surprisingly, development and function of the adult generation of Leydig cells was disturbed not only in ARKO but also in S-AR–/y mice (De Gendt et al, 2005). Leydig cell number in S-AR–/y testis was normal on day 12 but was reduced by more than 40% at later ages, and the Leydig cell size appeared to be increased. However, Leydig cell number in global ARKOs was reduced by up to 83% at all ages, and Leydig cell size did not increase beyond day 12. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for Leydig cell–specific markers confirmed that steroidogenic function per Leydig cell was increased in S-AR–/y mice but decreased in global ARKO mice. The altered Leydig cell number and function in the S-AR–/y testis might be due to expression changes of platelet-derived growth factor-A and estrogen sulfotransferase. The epididymis size in S-AR–/y mice was decreased by 63% of wild-type size (Wang et al, 2006), and S-AR–/y mice failed to impregnate wild-type female mice because of an absence of mature sperm production (Chang et al, 2004; De Gendt et al, 2004; Holdcraft and Braun, 2004a). These S-AR–/y mice studies above (Chang et al, 2004; De Gendt et al, 2004; Holdcraft and Braun, 2004a; Tan et al, 2005; Denolet et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2006; Eacker et al, 2007) clearly demonstrated that AR function in Sertoli cells is essential for the maintenance of fully competent Sertoli cell functions and the appropriate hormone levels to support the completion of meiosis I during spermatogenesis.


Figure 3
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Dissection of urogenital tracts of wild-type (WT), androgen receptor knockout (ARKO), and Sertoli cell–selective androgen receptor knockout (SCARKO) male mice at the age of 50 days. dd indicates ductus deferens; sv, seminal vesicles; t, testis; e, epididymis; ft, fat tissue. Originally published in DeGendt et al, 2004 (Copyright 2004, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A). Color figure available online at www.andrologyjournal.org.

 

Phenotypes of Leydig cell–selective ARKO mice. Testicular testosterone produced by the Leydig cells is essential for qualitatively and quantitatively complete spermatogenesis and development of the male phenotype. Long-term intratesticular testosterone withdrawal causes the failure of progression of round to elongated spermatids, particularly during stages VII and VIII of the spermatogenic cycle (O'Donnell et al, 1994). The AR is also expressed abundantly in the mature Leydig cells. Knocking out the AR selectively in Leydig cells (L-AR–/y) by Amhr2-driven Cre strategy (Tsai et al, 2006; Xu et al, 2007) resulted in mice with decreased size of testis and epididymis, reduced serum levels of testosterone, and increased serum levels of LH. The histology of adult L-AR–/y mice testes showed a decrease in diameter of seminiferous tubules and germ cell development arrested predominantly at the round spermatid stage. There were no further differentiated mature elongated spermatids or spermatozoa throughout the L-AR–/y testis. Consequently, L-AR–/y mice were infertile because no sperm existed in the epididymis. Compared with wild-type male mice, the decreased size of testis in L-AR–/y mice was mainly because of a defect in Leydig cell steroidogenic function subsequently affecting Sertoli cell functions to support postmeiotic germ cells, whereas the decrease in epididymis size in L-AR–/y mice could be due to the lower serum testosterone levels and no mature sperm production. The decreased synthesis of testosterone by Leydig cells and lower levels of serum testosterone reduced feedback on the hypothalamus and pituitary; thus, LH levels were elevated. It is important to note that the AR knockout in Leydig cells in this model was not complete. S-AR–/y mice also had consequences for the development of normal Leydig cell numbers with a normal or increased Leydig cell size, whereas the size of the Leydig cells in ARKO mice was reduced (De Gendt et al, 2005). The L-AR–/y mice studies revealed that AR function in Leydig cells is essential for the maintenance of appropriate Leydig cell steroidogenic function and the subsequent affect on Sertoli cell functions to support spermiogenesis: the final differentiation of round spermatids to mature elongated spermatids (Xu et al, 2007).

Phenotypes of PM cell–selective ARKO mice. PM cells are the AR-positive cells surrounding the seminiferous tubules in the testis. These cells might play an indirect role in spermatogenesis through control and maintenance of Sertoli cell function, as well as in the transport of spermatozoa through the tubular lumen by contractions of the seminiferous tubules (Maekawa et al, 1996; Romano et al, 2005). Indeed, the adult PM-AR–/y mice exhibited decreased testis size and decreased epididymal sperm count compared with wild-type males, but fertility was normal (Zhang et al, 2006). Loss of functional AR in PM cells might impair smooth muscle contractility, Sertoli cell nourishing function, and the integrity of Sertoli cell junctions, consequently affecting testis sperm production and slowing down germ cell movement (Zhang et al, 2006). However, a recent study on the PM cell–selective ARKO mice (Welsh et al, 2009) showed that all PM-ARKO males were azoospermic and infertile, indicating that AR in PM cells is essential for normal testis function, spermatogenesis, and fertility in males. The very different testicular phenotypes from the two research groups of PM-ARKO mice were just caused by their usage of different smooth muscle–driven Cre lines (SM22-Cre and smMHC-Cre) on cell-specific ablation of testicular AR from mouse testes, because the SM22-Cre line reported by Zhang et al (2006) did not alter AR expression in testicular PM cells (Frutkin et al, 2006, Welsh et al, 2009), whereas the smMHC-Cre line used by Welsh et al (2009) deleted AR from a proportion of PM cells, although both lines deleted AR from smooth muscle cells surrounding testicular blood vessels. Therefore, the mild phenotypes reported by Zhang et al (2006) in their PM cell AR knockout (KO) model might not truly reflect the importance of androgen action via PM cells.

Phenotypes of germ cell–selective ARKO mice. Unlike Sertoli cells, PM cells, and Leydig cells (Anthony et al, 1989; Sar et al, 1990; Kimura et al, 1993; Bremner et al, 1994; Vornberger et al, 1994; Zhou et al, 1996), whether germ cells express the AR by localization of AR with antibodies is still controversial. Some studies indicated that AR is present in germ cells in different species (Kimura et al, 1993; Janssen et al, 1994; Vornberger et al, 1994; Zhou et al, 1996; Arenas et al, 2001), but other reports showed little AR staining in the germ cells (Galena et al, 1974; Grootegoed et al, 1977; Anthony et al, 1989; Bremner et al, 1994; Van Roijen et al, 1995; Suarez-Quian et al, 1999; Pelletier et al, 2000). The testis of G-AR–/y mice showed similar testis size and normal spermatogenesis at every spermatogenic stage compared with wild-type testis (Tsai et al, 2006). The G-AR–/y mice study clearly demonstrated that androgen/AR signals in germ cells do not have significant effects on sperm maturation and testis development.

Phenotypes of prostate epithelial– or prostate stroma–selective ARKO or AR knockdown mice, or both. The prostate is an androgen-dependent organ during fetal organogenesis, through pubertal development when the prostate completes structural and functional maturation, and in later life when prostate cells remain sensitive to androgen during evolution of prostate disease (Cunha et al, 2004; Heinlein and Chang, 2004). Androgens stimulate proliferation and restrain apoptosis of prostate cells. Prostate diseases during later life are among the major causes of death, disability, and health costs in developed countries. Compared with the global ARKO mice exhibiting abolished prostate development, the PEARKO mice (Simanainen et al, 2007, 2009; Niu et al, 2008) showed prostate development with normal branching morphogenesis but lobe-specific decrease in prostate weight and hindered structural and functional differentiation of the mature prostate epithelium. The most striking change was increased proliferation and abnormal lesions of epithelial cells predominantly in the anterior lobe of PEARKO mice. These results indicated the vital role of stromal AR in postnatal prostate growth and structural differentiation and the necessity of epithelial AR in maintaining functional differentiation and proliferation of epithelial cells in a lobe-specific manner (Simanainen et al, 2007). The epithelial apoptosis in castration-induced prostatic involution did not significantly differ between control (intact AR) and PEARKO (only stromal AR) males, demonstrating that prostate epithelial involution after castration is mediated primarily via stromal AR-dependent apoptotic signals. The epithelial AR inactivation during postnatal prostate development sensitizes PEARKOs to paracrine signaling mediated by stromal AR activity, leading to indirect androgen-induced epithelial hyperproliferation and formation of epithelial hyperplastic cysts by aromatizable androgens (Simanainen et al, 2009). The double prostate epithelium AR and stroma AR knockdown mice (Niu et al, 2008) further confirmed that the prostate stromal AR might play a more dominant role than the epithelial AR to promote epithelial proliferation.

Conclusions and Future Directions

The conditional knockout mice are a wonderful tool to use to further unravel the molecular mechanisms of the roles of the AR gene in male and female reproduction by global or cell-specific ablations of the AR gene in the body. From the results of the AR knockout models, we can conclude that androgen and AR signal pathways in Wolffian ducts, the genital tubercle, and urogenital sinus during the embryonic developmental stage play a critical role in the differentiation and development of male internal and external genitalia, and AR has a role in the structural and functional differentiation of cells responsible for spermatogenesis, male fertility, and prostate. AR also has an important role in normal ovary and breast development and function in females. Activity of the AR plays an important role during at least three steps of spermatogenesis: progression through meiosis I, the transition from round to elongated spermatids, and the terminal stages of spermiogenesis (Holdcraft and Braun, 2004b; Xu et al, 2007; Kerkhofs et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2009). However, many questions still need to be answered, such as exact molecular mechanisms for AR regulation of Sertoli cells and Leydig cells, PM cell proliferation and differentiation, and prostate epithelium and stromal cells. Loss of functional AR in Sertoli cells has also had marked effects on Leydig cell development and function by pathways that have been only partially elucidated. It would also be of interest to determine the loss of AR in which types of cells in the body would be able to cause agenesis of male accessory genital organs, as in the global ARKO mice. Future studies include investigation of detailed molecular mechanisms in cell-specific AR knockout male mice, which possibly results in creation of a reversibly safe male contraceptive method and improvements in the treatment of infertility, hypogonadism, and testicular dysgenesis syndrome, as well as generation of cell-specific ARKO female mice, to explore the relative contribution of different types of AR-expressed cells to androgen actions in female folliculogenesis and breast development.


References

Anthony CT, Kovacs WJ, Skinner MK. Analysis of the androgen receptor in isolated testicular cell types with a microassay that uses an affinity ligand. Endocrinology. 1989; 125: 2628 –2635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arenas MI, Royuela M, Lobo MV, Alfaro JM, Fraile B, Paniagua R. Androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and estrogen receptor-beta (ER-beta) expression in the testis of the newt, Triturus marmoratus marmoratus during the annual cycle. J Anat. 2001;199: 465 –472.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bardin CW, Bullock L, Schneider G, Allison JE, Stanley AJ. Pseudohermaphrodite rat: end organ insensitivity to testosterone. Science. 1970;167: 1136 –1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Sharpe RM, Saunders PT. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors in the rat testis: evidence for stage-dependent expression and regulation by androgens. Endocrinology. 1994; 135: 1227 –1234.[Abstract]

Cardenas H, Herrich JR, Pope WF. Increased ovulation rate in gilts treated with dihydrotestosterone. Reproduction. 2002; 123: 527 –533.[Abstract]

Chang C, Chen YT, Yeh SD, Xu Q, Wang RS, Guillou F, Lardy H, Yeh S. Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and hypotestosteronemia in male mice lacking the androgen receptor in Sertoli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101: 6876 –6881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chang C, Saltzman A, Yeh S, Young W, Keller E, Lee HJ, Wang C, Mizokami A. Androgen receptor: an overview. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1995;5: 97 –125.[Medline]

Choong CS, Wilson EM. Trinucleotide repeats in the human androgen receptor: a molecular basis for disease. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998;21: 235 –257.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cunha GR, Ricke W, Thomson A, Marker PC, Risbridger G, Hayward SW, Wang YZ, Donjacour AA, Kurita T. Hormonal, cellular, and molecular regulation of normal and neoplastic prostatic development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;92: 221 –236.[CrossRef][Medline]

De Gendt K, Atanassova N, Tan KA, de Franca LR, Parreira GG, McKinnell C, Sharpe RM, Saunders PT, Mason JI, Hartung S, Ivell R, Denolet E, Verhoeven G. Development and function of the adult generation of Leydig cells in mice with Sertoli cell–selective or total ablation of the androgen receptor. Endocrinology. 2005; 146: 4117 –4126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Gendt K, Swinnen JV, Saunders PT, Schoonjans L, Dewerchin M, Devos A, Tan K, Atanassova N, Claessens F, Lecureuil C, Heyns W, Carmeliet P, Guillou F, Sharpe RM, Verhoeven G. A Sertoli cell–selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 1327 –1332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Denolet E, De Gendt K, Allemeersch J, Engelen K, Marchal K, Van Hummelen P, Tan KA, Sharpe RM, Saunders PT, Swinnen JV, Verhoeven G. The effect of a Sertoli cell–selective knockout of the androgen receptor on testicular gene expression in prepubertal mice. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20: 321 –334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Donath J, Michna H, Nishino Y. The antiovulatory effect of the antiprogestin onapristone could be related to down-regulation of intraovarian progesterone (receptors). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1997; 62: 107 –118.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eacker SM, Shima JE, Connolly CM, Sharma M, Holdcraft RW, Griswold MD, Braun RE. Transcriptional profiling of androgen receptor (AR) mutants suggests instructive and permissive roles of AR signaling in germ cell development. Mol Endocrinol. 2007; 21(4): 895 –907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frutkin AD, Shi H, Otsuka G, Leveen P, Karlsson S, Dichek DA. A critical developmental role for tgfbr2 in myogenic cell lineages is revealed in mice expressing SM22-Cre, not SMMHC-Cre. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006;41: 724 –731.[CrossRef][Medline]

Galena HJ, Pillai AK, Terner C. Progesterone and androgen receptors in non-flagellate germ cells of the rat testis. J Endocrinol. 1974;63: 223 –237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gill A, Jamnongjit M, Hammes SR. Androgens promote maturation and signalling in mouse oocytes independent of transcription: a release of inhibition model for mammalian oocyte meiosis. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18: 97 –104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goldstein JL, Wilson JD. Studies on the pathogenesis of the pseudohermaphroditism in the mouse with testicular feminization. J Clin Invest. 1972;51: 1647 –1658.[CrossRef][Medline]

Griffin JE. Androgen resistance—the clinical and molecular spectrum. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 611 –618.[Medline]

Griswold MD. The central role of Sertoli cells in spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Devel Biol. 1998; 9: 411 –416.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grootegoed JA, Peters MJ, Mulder E, Rommerts FF, Van der Molen HJ. Absence of a nuclear androgen receptor in isolated germinal cells of rat testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1977; 9: 159 –167.[CrossRef][Medline]

Heinlein CA, Chang C. Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview. Endocr Rev. 2002; 23: 175 –200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heinlein CA, Chang C. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr Rev. 2004; 25: 276 –308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hickey TE, Marrocco DL, Amato F, Ritter LJ, Norman RJ, Gilchrist RB, Armstrong DT. Androgens augment the mitogenic effects of oocyte-secreted factors and growth differentiation factor 9 on porcine granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 2005; 73: 825 –832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirai M, Hirata S, Osada T, Hagihara K, Kato J. Androgen receptor mRNA in the rat ovary and uterus. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1994;49: 1 –7.[CrossRef][Medline]

Holdcraft RW, Braun RE. Androgen receptor function is required in Sertoli cells for the terminal differentiation of haploid spermatids. Development. 2004a; 131: 459 –467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holdcraft RW, Braun RE. Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis. Int J Androl. 2004b; 27: 335 –342.[CrossRef][Medline]

Horie K, Takakura K, Fujiwara H, Suginami H, Liao S, Mori T. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle in relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Hum Reprod. 1992; 7(2): 184 –190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hu YC, Wang PH, Yeh S, Wang RS, Xie C, Xu Q, Zhou X, Chao HT, Tsai MY, Chang C. Subfertility and defective folliculogenesis in female mice lacking androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(31): 11209 –11214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hutson JM, Hasthorpe S, Heyns CF. Anatomical and functional aspects of testicular descent and cryptorchidism. Endocr Rev. 1997; 18: 259 –280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Janssen PJ, Brinkmann AO, Boersma WJ, Van der Kwast TH. Immunohistochemical detection of the androgen receptor with monoclonal antibody F39.4 in routinely processed, paraffin-embedded human tissues after microwave pre-treatment. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994; 42: 1169 –1175.[Abstract]

Kerkhofs S, Denayer S, Haelens A, Claessens F. Androgen receptor knockout and knock-in mouse models. J Mol Endocrinol. 2009; 42(1): 11 –7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimura N, Mizokami A, Oonuma T, Sasano H, Nagura H. Immunocytochemical localization of androgen receptor with polyclonal antibody in paraffin-embedded human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41: 671 –678.[Abstract]

La Spada AR, Wilson EM, Lubahn DB, Harding AE, Fischbeck KH. Androgen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature. 1991; 352: 77 –79.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liao DJ, Dickson RB. Roles of androgens in the development, growth, and carcinogenesis of the mammary gland. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;80: 175 –189.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lyon MF, Hawkes SG. X-linked gene for testicular feminization in the mouse. Nature. 1970; 227: 1217 –1219.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maekawa M, Kamimura K, Nagano T. Peritubular myoid cells in the testis: their structure and function. Arch Histol Cytol. 1996;59: 1 –13.[Medline]

Matsumoto T, Takeyama K, Sato T, Kato S. Androgen receptor functions from reverse genetic models. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;85: 95 –99.[CrossRef][Medline]

McPhaul MJ. Molecular defects of the androgen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999; 69: 315 –322.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meyers-Wallen VN, Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Fisher S, Moorhead PH, Goldschmidt MH, Haskins ME, Patterson DF. Testicular feminization in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989; 195: 631 –634.[Medline]

Niu Y, Altuwaijri S, Yeh S, Lai KP, Yu S, Chuang KH, Huang SP, Lardy H, Chang C. Targeting the stromal androgen receptor in primary prostate tumors at earlier stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 12188 –93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

O'Donnell L, McLachlan RI, Wreford NG, Robertson DM. Testosterone promotes the conversion of round spermatids between stages VII and VIII of the rat spermatogenic cycle. Endocrinology. 1994; 135(6): 2608 –2614.[Abstract]

Ophoff J, Van Proeyen K, Callewaert F, De Gendt K, De Bock K, Vanden Bosch A, Verhoeven G, Hespel P, Vanderschueren D. Androgen signaling in myocytes contributes to the maintenance of muscle mass and fiber type regulation but not to muscle strength or fatigue. Endocrinology. 2009; 150: 3437 –3439.[Free Full Text]

Pelletier G, Labrie C, Labrie F. Localization of oestrogen receptor alpha, oestrogen receptor beta and androgen receptors in the rat reproductive organs. J Endocrinol. 2000; 165: 359 –370.[Abstract]

Quigley CA. The androgen receptor: physiology and pathophysiology. In: Nieschlag E, & Behre HM eds. Testosterone: Action, Deficiency, Substitution. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1998; 33–106.

Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev. 1995; 16: 271 –321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Romano F, Tripiciano A, Muciaccia B, De Cesaris P, Ziparo E, Palombi F, Filippini A. The contractile phenotype of peritubular smooth muscle cells is locally controlled: possible implications in male fertility. Contraception. 2005; 72: 294 –297.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sar M, Lubahn DB, French FS, Wilson EM. Immunohistochemical localization of the androgen receptor in rat and human tissues. Endocrinology. 1990; 127: 3180 –3186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schreiber JR, Ross GT. Further characterisation of a rat ovarian testosterone receptor with evidence for nuclear translocation. Endocrinology. 1976; 99: 590 –596.[Medline]

Schultz MG. Male pseudohermaphroditism diagnosed with aid of sex chromatin technique. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1962; 140: 241 –244.[Medline]

Shiina H, Matsumoto T, Sato T, Igarashi K, Miyamoto J, Takemasa S, Sakari M, Takada I, Nakamura T, Metzger D, Chambon P, Kanno J, Yoshikawa H, Kato S. Premature ovarian failure in androgen receptor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(1): 224 –229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simanainen U, Allan CM, Lim P, McPherson S, Jimenez M, Zajac JD, Davey RA, Handelsman DJ. Disruption of prostate epithelial androgen receptor impedes prostate lobe-specific growth and function. Endocrinology. 2007; 148(5): 2264 –2272..[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simanainen U, McNamara K, Gao YR, Handelsman DJ. Androgen sensitivity of prostate epithelium is enhanced by postnatal androgen receptor inactivation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 296(6): E1335 –E1343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Suarez-Quian CA, Martinez-Garcia F, Nistal M, Regadera J. Androgen receptor distribution in adult human testis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84: 350 –358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Szoltys M, Slomczynska M. Changes in distribution of androgen receptor during maturation of rat ovarian follicles. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2000; 108: 228 –234.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tan KA, De Gendt K, Atanassova N, Walker M, Sharpe RM, Saunders PT, Denolet E, Verhoeven G. The role of androgens in Sertoli cell proliferation and functional maturation: studies in mice with total or Sertoli cell–selective ablation of the androgen receptor. Endocrinology. 2005; 146: 2674 –2683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tetsuka M, Whitelaw PF, Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Smyth CD, Hillier SG. Developmental regulation of androgen receptor in rat ovary. J Endocrinol. 1995;145: 535 –543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tong SY, Hutson JM, Watts LM. Does testosterone diffuse down the Wolffian duct during sexual differentiation? J Urol. 1996; 155: 2057 –2059.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tsai MY, Yeh SD, Wang RS, Yeh S, Zhang C, Lin HY, Tzeng CR, Chang C. Differential effects of spermatogenesis and fertility in mice lacking androgen receptor in individual testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 18975 –18980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Roijen JH, Van Assen S, Van Der Kwast TH, De Rooij DG, Boersma WJ, Vreeburg JT, Weber RF. Androgen receptor immunoexpression in the testes of subfertile men. J Androl. 1995; 16: 510 –516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vendola KA, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, Weil SJ, Bondy CA. Androgens stimulate early stages of follicular growth in the primate ovary. J Clin Investig. 1998;101: 2622 –2629.[Medline]

Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, Famuyiwa OA, Bievre M, Bondy CA. Androgens promote oocyte insulin-like growth factor I expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod. 1999;61: 353 –357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vornberger W, Prins G, Musto NA, Suarez-Quian CA. Androgen receptor distribution in rat testis: new implications for androgen regulation of spermatogenesis. Endocrinology. 1994; 134: 2307 –2316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walters KA, Allan CM, Jimenez M, Lim PR, Davey RA, Zajac JD, Illingworth P, Handelsman DJ. Female mice haploinsufficient for an inactivated androgen receptor (AR) exhibit age-dependent defects that resemble the AR null phenotype of dysfunctional late follicle development, ovulation, and fertility. Endocrinology. 2007; 148(8): 3674 –3684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walters KA, McTavish KJ, Seneviratne MG, Jimenez M, McMahon AC, Allan CM, Salamonsen LA, Handelsman DJ. Subfertile female androgen receptor knockout mice exhibit defects in neuroendocrine signaling, intraovarian function, and uterine development but not uterine function. Endocrinology. 2009; 150(7): 3274 –3282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang RS, Yeh S, Chen LM, Lin HY, Zhang C, Ni J, Wu CC, di Sant'Agnese PA, deMesy-Bentley KL, Tzeng CR, Chang C. Androgen receptor in sertoli cell is essential for germ cell nursery and junctional complex formation in mouse testes. Endocrinology. 2006; 147(12): 5624 –5633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang RS, Yeh S, Tzeng CR, Chang C. Androgen receptor roles in spermatogenesis and fertility: lessons from testicular cell-specific androgen receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev. 2009; 30(2): 119 –132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weil S, Vendola K, Zhou J, Bondy CA. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84: 2951 –2956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Welsh M, Saunders PT, Atanassova N, Sharpe RM, Smith LB. Androgen action via testicular peritubular myoid cells is essential for male fertility. FASEB J. 2009; 23(12): 4218 –4230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilson JD, George FW, Griffin JE. The hormonal control of sexual development. Science. 1981; 211(4488): 1278 –1284.[Free Full Text]

Xu Q, Lin HY, Yeh SD, Yu IC, Wang RS, Chen YT, Zhang C, Altuwaijri S, Chen LM, Chuang KH, Chiang HS, Yeh S, Chang C. Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in male mice lacking androgen receptor in Leydig cells. Endocrine. 2007; 32: 96 –106.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yeh S, Hu YC, Wang PH, Xie C, Xu Q, Tsai MY, Dong Z, Wang RS, Lee TH, Chang C. Abnormal mammary gland development and growth retardation in female mice and MCF7 breast cancer cells lacking androgen receptor. J Exp Med. 2003; 198(12): 1899 –1908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yeh S, Tsai MY, Xu Q, Mu XM, Lardy H, Huang KE, Lin H, Yeh SD, Altuwaijri S, Zhou X, Xing L, Boyce BF, Hung MC, Zhang S, Gan L, Chang C. Generation and characterization of androgen receptor knockout (ARKO) mice: an in vivo model for the study of androgen functions in selective tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 13498 –13503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang C, Yeh S, Chen YT, Wu CC, Chuang KH, Lin HY, Wang RS, Chang YJ, Mendis-Handagama C, Hu L, Lardy H, Chang C. Oligozoospermia with normal fertility in male mice lacking the androgen receptor in testis peritubular myoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 17718 –17723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou X, Kudo A, Kawakami H, Hirano H. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in mouse testicular germ cells during fetal and postnatal development. Anat Rec. 1996; 245: 509 –518.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/235    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, X.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS