Journal of Andrology Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Epididymis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Right arrow Return to article

Table 6. Comparisons of variables according to the vascular status of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED)
      Type of EDa
 
 
  Control (n = 50)a
  Arterial Insufficiency (n = 26)
  Veno-occlusive Dysfunction (n = 37)
  Mixed-Type Impotence (n = 29)
  ANOVA P
  Prolidase activity, U/L   45.7 ± 4.9b   56.3 ± 5.7c   53.2 ± 6.6d   55.9 ± 5.2   <.001
  —SH, mmol/L   0.29 ± 0.03e   0.27 ± 0.04   0.28 ± 0.04   0.27 ± 0.03   <.001
  LOOH, µmol/L tBLOOH
  4.8 ± 0.8f
  5.12 ± 0.43
  4.89 ± 0.69
  4.96 ± 0.73
  <.001

  Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; LOOH, lipid hydroperoxide; —SH, free sulfhydryl groups; tBLOOH, tert butyl hydroperoxide.
  a Measurements are given as mean ± SD.
  b P < .001 versus arterial insufficiency, veno-occlusive dysfunction, mixed-type impotence.
  c P < .001 versus veno-occlusive dysfunction, P < .001 versus mixed-type impotence.
  d P < .001 versus mixed-type impotence.
  e P < .001 versus arterial insufficiency, veno-occlusive dysfunction, mixed-type impotence.
  f P < .001 versus arterial insufficiency, versus mixed-type impotence.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS