| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

From the * Department of Genetics, University of
Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and the
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate
School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| Correspondence to: Dr Richard Behringer, Department of Genetics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: rrb{at}mdanderson.org). |
| Received for publication May 7, 2009; accepted for publication October 5, 2009. |
The mammalian testis is a complex organ composed of multiple cell types
that are organized into seminiferous tubules and an interstitium, producing
spermatozoa and hormones, respectively. During embryogenesis, the testis forms
from the genital ridge associated with the embryonic kidney called the
mesonephros. After germ cells migrate into the genital ridge, the Sertoli
cell–germ cell mass forms and undergoes morphogenetic changes to
generate testis cords, the precursors of the seminiferous tubules. Static
images of the fetal testis at sequential stages of development provide
structural information about cord formation. Transgenic mice that express
fluorescent protein reporters offer new opportunities for time-lapse imaging
to visualize live cells and their behaviors during testis differentiation and
morphogenesis.
Key words: Fetal gonad, seminiferous tubule, fluorescent protein, time-lapse imaging
In most mammals, testis formation occurs in XY individuals. Although the development of the mammalian testis has been studied intensely, it has been difficult to examine the cellular behaviors that lead to cord and interstitium formation. The use of novel imaging and data processing techniques, in conjunction with the generation of several new transgenic mouse models that express fluorescent proteins, has recently led to a detailed description of the dynamic interplay between different cell types and tissues during testis morphogenesis. This review focuses on recent findings and technologies that examine testis formation in the mouse.
The Testis Forms From the Genital Ridge in XY Embryos![]()
The testes form in XY embryos from a pair of gonad precursors associated
with the mesonephroi. In the mouse, at tail somite stage 8 (TS8, embryonic day
10.5 [E10.5]), the gonad precursor or genital ridge is a thickening of the
coelomic epithelium on the ventromedial side of the mesonephros (for review
see Swain and Lovell-Badge,
2002). Primordial germ cells (PGCs) migrate into the genital
ridges between E10.5 and E11.5 (Ginsburg
et al, 1990; Lawson and Hage,
1994; Anderson et al,
2000). At E11.5, whole-mount views
(Figure 1) and histology of the
fetal testes show a homogeneous mixture of PGCs and somatic cells with no
obvious structures. One day later at E12.5, and at older stages, testis cords
can be seen when viewed with a stereodissecting microscope, and histology
reveals the formation of testis cords
(Figure 1) composed of Sertoli
cells and germ cells that are surrounded by an interstitium. In addition, the
fetal testis has developed a heterogeneously organized vasculature
(Figure 1) that is distinct
from the fetal ovary, which at the same stage has a diffuse network of
endothelial cells.
|
Sertoli cells. Sertoli cells are the primary somatic component of testis cords in the embryo and adult. Their main role is to provide a nurturing environment for germ cells (Mruk and Cheng, 2004). Sertoli cells originate from the coelomic epithelium between TS15 and TS17 and migrate into the genital ridge (Karl and Capel, 1998). The first sign of testis differentiation is an increase in cell proliferation in Sertoli cells at TS17–18 (Schmahl et al, 2000; Schmahl and Capel, 2003). This leads to a rapid increase in gonadal size, specifically the number of cell layers that contributes to the gonad (Karl and Capel, 1995). Interestingly, there is a temporary cessation in Sertoli cell proliferation between E11.5 and E12.5 (Schmahl et al, 2000), suggesting that the gonadal thickness increase observed during this time is due to cell migration or rearrangement of Sertoli cells and possibly other cell types. Morphometric analysis of testis formation demonstrated that the gonad roughly doubles in width every 24 hours from E11.5 to E13.5 (Nel-Themaat et al, 2009). It was suggested that the increase in gonad thickness during this window of time is a result of Sertoli and other cell types migrating more towards the center of the gonad, because there was a concomitant reduction in gonadal length. Cell proliferation is reinitiated at E12.5, reaches its highest rate at E14.5, and continues until after birth (Schmahl et al, 2000).
|
Interstitium— Leydig cells. Leydig cells produce hormones that are essential for spermatogenesis and virilization. The expression of steroid biosynthesis pathway enzymes can be detected by E13.0 in the mouse testis (Baker et al, 1999). Leydig cells are located in the interstitium between testis cords and are in close association with blood vessels. The tissue origin of Leydig cells remains elusive, and precursor tissues have been suggested to include the genital ridge, mesonephros, coelomic epithelium, and migrating neural crest cells (Griswold and Behringer, 2009). Fate mapping studies will be required to clarify the tissue origin of Leydig cells.
Vasculature. Testis cord formation is preceded by and dependent upon sex-specific mesenchymal cell migration from the mesonephros (Buehr et al, 1993; Merchant-Larios et al, 1993; Martineau et al, 1997; Tilmann and Capel, 1999). Although the identity and fate of the entire migrating cell population is questionable, one of the cell types that migrate into the testis from the mesonephros is vascular endothelial cells (Martineau et al, 1997; Brennan et al, 2002). Indeed, a recent study suggests that the migrating mesonephric cell population is predominantly comprised of endothelial cells (Combes et al, 2009). In the fetal testis, a unique mechanism exists through which individual endothelial cells originate from the breakdown of an existing mesonephric vessel. The individual cells then migrate via specific paths to the coelomic region and remodel to form the coelomic vessel and smaller superficial vessels (Coveney et al, 2008). The coelomic vessel spans the entire length of the gonad just below the coelomic epithelium and is one of the hallmarks that distinguish the fetal testes from the ovary in the mouse.
Visualizing Fetal Testis Differentiation— Fetal gonad culture. The XY urogenital ridge (genital ridge plus associated mesonephros) can be cultured in vitro for multiple days, resulting in the formation of testis cords and an interstitium. An early report by Byskov and Saxen (1976) described culture of embryonic mouse gonads from the 11th day of pregnancy "glued" to nucleopore filters using 1% agar. The filters were placed on grids to maintain the organs at the surface of Eagle balanced salt solution supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum in 5% CO2. Testis cords were noted on the third day of culture so that male and female gonads could be distinguished. Subsequent studies have refined the culture system so that the current method of choice is to culture fetal gonads at an air-medium interface on agar blocks (Evans et al, 1982; McLaren and Buehr, 1990). Although these ex vivo cultured gonads are not identical to their in vivo counterparts (Evans et al, 1982), major developmental events such as cell differentiation, migration, and testis cord formation take place to the extent that the cultured gonad's developmental stage is more or less equivalent with that of in vivo controls (Buehr et al, 1993; Martineau et al, 1997; Coveney et al, 2008; Nel-Themaat et al, 2009). The ability to achieve gonad differentiation ex vivo allows for a variety of studies. Recombinant ex vivo culture experiments, for example, demonstrated the necessity of male-specific mesonephric cell migration for testis cord formation (Buehr et al, 1993; Martineau et al, 1997). The same approach was used to identify the migrating mesonephric cell type to endothelial cells, excluding PTM cells from this population (Cool et al, 2008; Combes et al, 2009). Importantly, for the purposes of this review, in vitro culture of the mouse urogenital ridge facilitates time-lapse imaging of testis differentiation and morphogenesis (Coveney et al, 2008; Nel-Themaat et al, 2009).
Transgenic mouse models for visualizing live cells in the developing testis. Histological analysis of fixed tissues combined with cell type–specific molecular markers provides important information about cell differentiation, the location of cells within the forming testis, and higher-order structures like cords and the interstitium. Unfortunately, these techniques cannot be used to follow live cell behaviors over time, including proliferation, apoptosis, cell shape changes, and migration. Transgenic mouse strains that express fluorescent proteins such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of cell-specific promoters provide important tools for visualizing live cell behaviors. Subsequently, a variety of different fluorescent protein colors and transgenic/knock-in mice that express them ubiquitously or in specific cell types have been generated (Hadjantonakis et al, 2003). Tissues from these mouse strains can be used to examine the behaviors of unique cell types or in combinations to follow potential interactions between different cell types as the testis develops. Existing transgenic mouse models that label specific testicular cells or tissues include those that express fluorescent proteins in germ cells (Anderson et al, 1999), interstitial and PTM cells (Cool et al, 2008), endothelial cells (Coveney et al, 2008; Larina et al, 2009), and Sertoli cells (Nel-Themaat et al, 2009) (Figure 1), whereas lines that express fluorescent proteins ubiquitously are useful for tissue recombinant culture experiments (Combes et al, 2009). Fluorescent protein fusion proteins that result in their subcellular localization (eg, nucleus or plasma membrane) provide further tools for following the behaviors of live cells (Hadjantonakis et al, 2003).
Time-lapse imaging of fetal testes. The advantage of a live imaging culture system is that the organs can be cultured intact while data are collected at specified time intervals to generate movies. The utility of such an approach was demonstrated using a Cre-loxP fate mapping system to produce mice that expressed GFP in endothelial cells. The resulting movies of fetal testis and ovary development showed endothelial cell behaviors, revealing different modes of vascularization of male and female gonads (Coveney et al, 2008). In addition, time-lapse imaging of Sox9-GFP knock-in mice that express GFP in Sertoli cells revealed the complex behavior of the Sertoli cell–germ cell mass during cord formation (Nel-Themaat et al, 2009; Figure 1).
Three-dimensional modeling of testis development. Despite very detailed and precise imaging techniques, determining the overall structure of the developing gonad is a difficult task because it requires three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Two recent publications that focus on testis cord formation included computational analyses to create 3D models of the forming fetal testis. Combes et al (2009) used whole-mount immunostaining and confocal microscopy to obtain optical sections through the entire fetal testis at different stages of development. Cord boundaries were manually defined and processed with the tomography program IMOD to create the final 3D model. The models of the fetal testis cords were stunning, providing a 3D appreciation of testis cord complexity at different stages of development. Nel-Themaat et al (2009) reconstructed individual cords by serial paraffin sections, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and manual outlining of individual cords. Subsequent 3D reconstruction was performed by interpolation using a custom written MATLAB program. Experiments from both groups lead to similar models, revealing the complex 3D nature of fetal testis cords. These computer models allow one to view cord structures from any perspective, and movies generated of these rotating models serve as excellent visual tools. Another approach is to create 3D models based on experimental findings, using rendering software. Here, we utilized the average morphometric data obtained from Sox9-EGFP fetal testes at different stages of development (Nel-Themaat et al, 2009) to create a 3D model of testis cord formation (Figure 2). The data demonstrated that cord formation involves a complex series of tissue remodeling events. The evenly shaped, seemingly uniform mixture of somatic and germ cells of the indifferent gonad rapidly changes morphology to first form small protrusions distally of the mesonephros. These subsequently enlarge, become defined, and develop into sex cords, while the initial number of primordial cords is reduced. Complex inner cord branching is common, as well as connections with adjacent cords. These findings were incorporated into the creation of our models and provided a new perspective of overall tissue behavior during this intricate process. The models can be used to generate animations to give us additional perspectives of the organ at different developmental stages (see Supplemental Figure 2 movie, available online at www.andrologyjournal.org).
Summary and Conclusions![]()
Organogenesis is one of the most fascinating events of developmental
biology. The ability to follow cells through their specification and
differentiation while they migrate and form alliances with neighboring cells
to form tissues, and then to determine how different tissue types come
together and interact to form a functioning organ, is truly remarkable. The
ability to culture and image the urogenital ridge ex vivo provides an
excellent model organ for studying these events. Research over the last 2
decades has provided knowledge of different cell type origins, genetic
regulation, and cellular interactions and dynamics of how the bipotential
gonad develops into the embryonic testis. Some of the cellular mechanisms that
regulate testis morphogenesis may also play a role in the development of other
organs, such as the lung and kidney, which are also comprised of tubular
structures and can be cultured ex vivo. It appears that many of the imaging
and computational tools required to follow and analyze live cell behaviors
during organogenesis are currently in hand and will likely yield new insights
into testis morphogenesis in the near future.
Acknowledgments
We thank Hao Chang for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant HD30284 and the Ben F. Love Endowed Chair (R.R.B.) and by NIH HD07324 (L.N.).
References
Anderson R, Copeland TK, Scholer H, Heasman J, Wylie C. The onset of germ cell migration in the mouse embryo. Mech Dev. 2000; 91: 61 –68.[CrossRef][Medline]
Anderson R, Fassler R, Georges-Labouesse E, Hynes RO, Bader BL, Kreidberg JA, Schaible K, Heasman J, Wylie C. Mouse primordial germ cells lacking beta1 integrins enter the germline but fail to migrate normally to the gonads. Development. 1999; 126: 1655 –1664.[Abstract]
Baker PJ, Sha JA, McBride MW, Peng L, Payne AH, O'Shaughnessy PJ. Expression of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I and type VI isoforms in the mouse testis during development. Eur J Biochem. 1999; 260: 911 –917.[Medline]
Brennan J, Karl J, Capel B. Divergent vascular mechanisms downstream of Sry establish the arterial system in the XY gonad. Dev Biol. 2002; 244: 418 –428.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buehr M, Gu S, McLaren A. Mesonephric contribution to testis
differentiation in the fetal mouse. Development. 1993; 117: 273
–281.
Byskov AG, Saxen L. Induction of meiosis in fetal mouse testis in vitro. Dev Biol. 1976; 52: 193 –200.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campagnolo L, Russo MA, Puglianiello A, Favale A, Siracusa G.
Mesenchymal cell precursors of peritubular smooth muscle cells of the mouse
testis can be identified by the presence of the p75 neurotrophin receptor.
Biol Reprod. 2001; 64: 464
–472.
Combes AN, Wilhelm D, Davidson T, Dejana E, Harley V, Sinclair A, Koopman P. Endothelial cell migration directs testis cord formation. Dev Biol. 2009; 326: 112 –120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cool J, Carmona FD, Szucsik JC, Capel B. Peritubular myoid cells are not the migrating population required for testis cord formation in the XY gonad. Sex Dev. 2008; 2: 128 –133.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coveney D, Cool J, Oliver T, Capel B. Four-dimensional analysis of
vascularization during primary development of an organ, the gonad.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 7212
–7217.
Evans CW, Robb DI, Tuckett F, Challoner S. Regulation of meiosis in the foetal mouse gonad. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1982; 68: 59 –67.[Medline]
Ginsburg M, Snow MH, McLaren A. Primordial germ cells in the mouse
embryo during gastrulation. Development. 1990; 110: 521
–528.
Griswold SL, Behringer RR. Fetal Leydig cell origin and development. Sex Dev. 2009; 3: 1 –15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hadjantonakis AK, Dickinson ME, Fraser SE, Papaioannou VE. Technicolour transgenics: imaging tools for functional genomics in the mouse. Nat Rev Genet. 2003; 4: 613 –625.[Medline]
Jeanes A, Wilhelm D, Wilson MJ, Bowles J, McClive PJ, Sinclair AH,
Koopman P. Evaluation of candidate markers for the peritubular myoid cell
lineage in the developing mouse testis. Reproduction. 2005; 130: 509
–516.
Karl J, Capel B. Three-dimensional structure of the developing
mouse genital ridge. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol
Sci. 1995;350: 235
–242.
Karl J, Capel B. Sertoli cells of the mouse testis originate from the coelomic epithelium. Dev Biol. 1998; 203: 323 –333.[CrossRef][Medline]
Larina IV, Shen W, Kelly OG, Hadjantonakis AK, Baron MH, Dickinson ME. A membrane associated mCherry fluorescent reporter line for studying vascular remodeling and cardiac function during murine embryonic development. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009; 292: 333 –341.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lawson KA, Hage WJ. Clonal analysis of the origin of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Ciba Found Symp. 1994; 182: 68 –84; discussion 84–91.[Medline]
Martineau J, Nordqvist K, Tilmann C, Lovell-Badge R, Capel B. Male-specific cell migration into the developing gonad. Curr Biol. 1997;7: 958 –968.[CrossRef][Medline]
McCoshen JA. Quantitation of sex chromosomal influence(s) on the somatic growth of fetal gonads in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145: 469 –473.[Medline]
McLaren A, Buehr M. Development of mouse germ cells in cultures of fetal gonads. Cell Differ Dev. 1990; 31: 185 –195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Merchant-Larios H, Moreno-Mendoza N, Buehr M. The role of the mesonephros in cell differentiation and morphogenesis of the mouse fetal testis. Int J Dev Biol. 1993; 37: 407 –415.[Medline]
Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-germ cell
interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous
epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2004; 25: 747
–806.
Nel-Themaat L, Vadakkan TJ, Wang Y, Dickinson ME, Akiyama H, Behringer RR. Morphometric analysis of testis cord formation in Sox9-EGFP mice. Dev Dyn. 2009; 238: 1100 –1110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peters H. Migration of gonocytes into the mammalian gonad and their
differentiation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1970; 259: 91
–101.
Schmahl J, Capel B. Cell proliferation is necessary for the determination of male fate in the gonad. Dev Biol. 2003; 258: 264 –276.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schmahl J, Eicher EM, Washburn LL, Capel B. Sry induces cell proliferation in the mouse gonad. Development. 2000; 127: 65 –73.[Abstract]
Skinner MK, Tung PS, Fritz IB. Cooperativity between Sertoli cells
and testicular peritubular cells in the production and deposition of
extracellular matrix components. J Cell Biol. 1985; 100: 1941
–1947.
Swain A, Lovell-Badge R. Sex determination and differentiation. In: Rossant J, Tam PP, eds. Mouse Development: Patterning, Morphogenesis, and Organogenesis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2002 : 371–420.
Tilmann C, Capel B. Mesonephric cell migration induces testis cord formation and Sertoli cell differentiation in the mammalian gonad. Development. 1999; 126: 2883 –2890.[Abstract]
Tung PS, Fritz IB. Extracellular matrix components and testicular peritubular cells influence the rate and pattern of Sertoli cell migration in vitro. Dev Biol. 1986; 113: 119 –134.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. R. Kumar The "Glow"rious Sertoli and Germ Cells: Mouse Testis Development Visualized in Multi-Colors Biol Reprod, February 1, 2011; 84(2): 201 - 204. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |