Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print June 20, 2008, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.107.003996
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 29, No. 6, November/December 2008
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.107.003996

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/6/618    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, L.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, X.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu, L.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, X.-F.

Marital Status and Fertility of 185 Male Renal Transplant Recipients in China

LONG-GEN XU*, HONG-WEI WANG{dagger}, WANG-LING PENG{ddagger}, LI-MING JIN*, XIAO-FENG ZHU*, HUI-MING XU§, QI-ZHE SONG*, BIAO XU* AND XIAN-FAN DING*

From the * Center for Renal Transplantation, Jiulisong Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; the {dagger} Institute of Urology, Transplantation Center, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; the {ddagger} Department of Urology, the 153rd Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China; and the § Zhejiang Family Planning Research Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Correspondence to: Prof Long-Gen Xu, Director, Center for Renal Transplantation, Jiulisong Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China (e-mail: xulonggen{at}sina.com).
Received for publication August 24, 2007; accepted for publication May 22, 2008.

   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A questionnaire was designed to assess the effects of renal transplantation in men of reproductive age on marital status and fertility. The study sought to correlate recipients' marital status and fertility with the health of the recipients after the transplantation, the health of children they fathered after the procedure, and the functioning of the transplanted kidney. Male recipients (n = 243) who were single and of reproductive age before renal transplantation were selected from 2007 recipients of a renal transplant recorded in the authors' hospitals in China. Of the 243 surveyed, 185 completed the questionnaire and participated in follow-up in the clinic or by telephone. Their marital status and fertility were investigated. Of the 185 recipients, 69 got married 12–88 months (mean, 32.19 ± 14.30 months) after renal transplantation, and 62 of 69 couples were actively attempting to become pregnant. Fifty-three patients fathered 54 children, including 1 pair of twins, 9–72 months (mean, 25.81 ± 15.33 months) after marriage. The birth weights of the newborns ranged from 2500 to 4600 g (mean, 3395 ± 456.80 g). These children developed well. Nine patients did not father any children, and 3 of these 9 cases were attributable to infertility in the wife. Seven patients were using contraceptives. Three recipients suffered from chronic graft rejection and resumed hemodialysis 2–11 years after they fathered children. In addition, 2 patients died after fathering 1 child: 1 from dysfunction of the transplanted kidney 9 years after birth of his child, and another in an accident 1 year after his child's birth. Our findings suggest that, like men without renal transplants, male recipients of renal transplants can get married and father children, and the transplantation procedure appears to have no significant effect on the children fathered afterwards, on the recipients' health, or on the functioning of the transplanted kidney. It is very important to indicate that, in addition to needing contraception if they do not conceive, male renal transplant recipients should expect fertility rates that are similar to those of the general population.

     Key words: Questionnaire, hemodialysis, immunosuppressive drug therapy



Advances in renal transplantation technology allow patients with kidney failure to survive after receiving a transplanted organ. It has, therefore, become important for both clinical investigators and transplant recipients to understand the effects of transplantation on patient fertility and on children fathered after the procedure. The restoration of fertility in women following renal transplantation has been well documented in cases when good renal function is achieved (Byrd et al, 2000; Gutiérrez et al, 2005). Female recipients of a renal transplant successfully complete pregnancies that are safe for the mother, the fetus, and the renal allograft (Garcia-Donaire et al, 2005; Shrestha et al, 2007). In contrast to the abundant results on female transplant recipients, few investigations have addressed the effects of renal transplantation on the fertility of male recipients.

Because up to 40% of men receiving a kidney transplant are younger than 50, the fertility of male renal transplant recipients is a major concern (Huyghe et al, 2007). Several studies have suggested that most patients subjected to kidney transplantation and conventional immunosuppressants experience adequate recovery of sexual and reproductive function (Baumgarten et al, 1977; Holdsworth et al, 1978; Rodrigues Netto et al, 1980; Eid et al, 1996; De Celis and Pedrón-Nuevo, 1999). In fact, the levels of sex hormones and the quality of sexual life in patients with uremia were significantly improved after renal transplantation (Zheng et al, 1995; Prem et al, 1996). Also, the semen quality of patients with uremia improved after renal transplantation (Xu et al, 2004, 2005).

This retrospective study surveys the marital status and fertility of 243 male renal transplant recipients of reproductive age who were single before renal transplantation. These patients were identified from 2007 patients who underwent renal transplantation between April 1988 and April 2006 at 3 renal transplantation centers in the authors' hospitals in China.


   Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clinical Data

Among 185 male recipients who completed the questionnaire, 69 subjects between the ages of 26 and 49 (mean, 34.06 ± 5.14) at the time of follow-up were married after renal transplantation. All had undergone renal transplantation for the first time, 66 for primary chronic glomerulonephritis and 3 for renal hypertension. This study analyzed parameters related to both the male patients and their offspring.

Methods

Male recipients of renal transplants who were single and of reproductive age before surgery were selected from the original case records of renal transplantations in the authors' hospitals. A questionnaire was designed to survey the renal transplant recipients regarding their marital status, their fertility, and the developmental conditions of their offspring fathered after the transplantation. The survey covered the recipient's age, vocation, culture, marital status, course of renal disease, and dialysis method; the time of renal transplantation; the use of immunosuppressants after renal transplantation; the pregnancy status of the patient's wife; and the offspring's developmental conditions. Follow-up was conducted with those recipients who completed the questionnaire in the clinic or by telephone.

Statistical Analysis

Individual groups were compared with Student's t test, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, and a value of P < .05 was considered significant.


   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 185 recipients completed the questionnaire and participated in follow-up in the clinic or by telephone. No patient had a history of cryptorchidism, torsion, mumps, orchitis, prostatitis, or varicocele. The duration of renal disease was 26–49 months (mean, 24.74 ± 12.70 months). All 69 recipients had received dialysis therapy for 3–46 months (mean, 14.38 ± 7.87 months) before renal transplantation surgery: of these, 62 had undergone hemodialysis and 7 had undergone peritoneal dialysis.

The types and dosages of immunosuppressants taken by the recipients when their offspring were conceived were as follows: cyclosporin A (CsA), 1.5–3.5 mg kg–1 d–1; tacrolimus (FK 506), 0.03–0.1 mg kg–1 d–1; azathioprine (Aza), 50 mg/d; prednisone (Pred), 5–10 mg/d; and mycophenolic acid (MMF), 1.0 g/d. As a group, the recipients took a variety of combined immunosuppressive therapies, including 55 patients who took CsA-Aza-Pred, 9 who took CsA-MMF-Pred, 4 who took FK506-MMF-Pred, and 1 who took Aza-Pred.

Fifty-three of 62 (85.5%) patients who wished to have children had done so. Seven patients were using contraception. Nine of 69 patients did not father any children, with 3 of these cases because the subjects' wives suffered from uterine myomata and appendicitis. One patient's wife, who had a uterine myoma that was 2.8 x 2.6 cm in size, had been treated with leuporelin. After 3 months, the fibroid was found to be 2.6 x 2.0 cm in size. In the case of another patient's wife, a fibroidectomy had been performed 6 months earlier. Neither of the 2 women had become pregnant by the time of follow-up. In addition, 1 case of appendicitis was treated with antibiotics.

Moreover, the examination of semen samples obtained from 4 of 6 patients who had tried unsuccessfully to father children showed normal results according to the World Health Organization manual (1999), and the reasons for their inability to father children remain unidentified. Therefore, the incidence of infertility in these recipients was similar to that of a group of men with normal renal function. In addition, 7 patients were using contraception; among them, 4 did not yet desire to have children, and 3 had no desire to father children.

Sixty-nine of 185 (37.3%) renal transplant recipients got married 12–88 months (mean, 32.9 ± 14.38) after transplantation; among these married patients, 53 fathered 54 children 9–72 months (mean, 25.81 ± 15.33) after marriage. (One patient had twins.) Thus, the interval between transplantation and pregnancy was estimated to be 23–120 months (mean, 44.59 ± 17.32 months). Of the 54 newborn children, 26 were boys and 28 were girls. The birth weights of the newborns ranged from 2500 to 4600 g (mean, 3395 ± 456.80 g). In April 2006, the children were 2–211 months old (mean, 50.69 ± 48.41 months) and had developed normally.

The function of the allografted kidneys of the recipients was good at the time of conception. Three of 69 patients suffered from chronic graft rejection and resumed hemodialysis 2–11 years after having children. In addition, 1 patient died of dysfunction of the transplanted kidney when immunosuppressive drug therapy was discontinued 9 years after he had fathered a child. Another patient died in an accident 1 year after fathering a baby. All other recipients were still alive and in good health at the time of the survey.


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Men of reproductive age are eager to have a family and their own children as well. Studies clearly establish that successful kidney transplantation in women can restore normal menstruation and allow normal pregnancies that are safe for the mother, the fetus, and the renal allograft. Because up to 40% of men receiving a kidney transplant are younger than 50, the fertility of male renal transplant recipients is a major concern (Huyghe et al, 2007). Unfortunately, few studies have examined fertility and marriage status in this patient population, and most patients desire more information on sexuality, fertility, and renal disease (Schover et al, 1990). Therefore, we undertook this study to investigate the marriage status and fertility conditions of male recipients of renal transplants to provide valuable reference information for organ transplantation and andrology and as a guide for the marriage, birth control, and healthy birth and sound care of male renal transplant recipients.

Marital Status in Male Renal Transplant Recipients

Marital status has an important influence on people's mental health and on the stabilization and development of society (Guo and Hu, 2004). All of the 243 recipients who completed the questionnaire in our survey were of reproductive age, but they did suffer from uremia, which could lead to the impairment of many organs and tissues. Thus, their physical capacity, nutritional state, social communication, responsibility, routine work, family life, physiological health, and quality of life were seriously reduced. While suffering from uremia, the patients usually did not want to court. As indicated in this study, uremia had led to divorce for 7 patients, suggesting that uremia in a man can seriously affect his marriage. In general, after successful renal transplantation, the toxin in uremia patients can be removed by a transplanted kidney, leading to recovery of normal endocrine function, correction of the metabolic disorder, and an improvement in the quality of life up to the level of healthy men. In our investigation, 69 of 189 cases were married 12–88 months (mean, 32.19 ± 14.38 months) after renal transplantation. Moreover, 2 of the 7 patients divorced because of uremia remarried, one 2 and one 5 years after transplantation.

Research suggests that it is safe for men with transplants to have children. Armenti et al (2004) reported 97 cases of male recipients who received immunosuppressants such as CsA, FK506, or MMF, and had fathered children 120 times, leading to a total of 126 children, including twins and triplets. The mean birth weight of newborns was 3244 ± 649 g, which is very similar to the mean for babies in the general population, and no pediatric abnormalities were observed. In our study, 53 recipients fathered 54 children. The birth weight of newborns ranged from 2500 to 4600 g (3395 ± 456.80), which was similar to data reported in the literature. Physical examination showed that all children developed normally and revealed no abnormalities. Also, the function of the transplanted kidneys of the 53 patients was normal at the time of conception. Three patients, however, suffered from chronic graft rejection and resumed hemodialysis 2–11 years after fathering children. Unfortunately, 2 patients died, one from dysfunction of the transplanted kidney and another in an accident. It was clear that the ability of these 3 patients to father children was unaffected by the hemodialysis therapy and the later death of 2 patients. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that the renal transplantation had no observable negative effects on the health or fertility of the male recipients, on the functioning of the transplanted kidney, or on the health of the children fathered after the procedure. The renal transplant recipients were able to produce healthy children. Unfortunately, it was difficult for us to follow up on all patients who have received a renal transplant in our hospitals over the years that these procedures have been offered. Therefore, we are unable to calculate the percentage of transplant recipients who can have children.

To our knowledge, this is the largest study involving follow-up on renal transplant recipients that has been conducted so far in China. The results we gained in this study on marriage status and fertility of the male recipients of renal transplant will provide some important reference information for male renal transplant recipients concerning marriage and birth control. Because kidney transplantation greatly improves fertility in men affected by renal disease, those couples who do not wish to have children should use an effective method of contraception. Finally, it is very important to indicate that in addition to needing contraception if they do not conceive, male renal transplant recipients should expect fertility rates that are similar to those of the general population.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Nian-Qing Lu for his excellent assistance.


   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Armenti VT, Radomski JS, Moritz MJ, Gaughan WJ, Hecker WP, et al. Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2004 : 103–14.

Baumgarten SR, Lindsay GK, Wise GJ. Fertility problems in the renal transplant patient. J Urol. 1977; 118(6): 991 –993.[Medline]

Byrd L, Donnai P, Gokal R. Outcome of pregnancy following renal transplantation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 20(1): 15 –18.[Medline]

De Celis R, Pedrón-Nuevo N. Male fertility of kidney transplant patients with one to ten years of evolution using a conventional immunosuppressive regimen. Arch Androl. 1999; 42(1): 9 –20.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eid MM, Abdel-Hamid IA, Sobh MA, el-Saied MA. Assessment of sperm motion characteristics in infertile renal transplant recipients using computerized analysis. Int J Androl. 1996; 19(6): 338 –344.[Medline]

Garcia-Donaire JA, Acevedo M, Gutiérrez MJ, Manzanera MJ, Oliva E, Gutiérrez E, Andrés A, Morales JM. Tacrolimus as basic immunosuppression in pregnancy after renal transplantation. A single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37(9): 3754 –3755.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guo YL, Hu LQ. Andrology. Beijing, China: People's Health Press; 2004: 11 –13.

Gutiérrez MJ, Acebedo-Ribó M, García-Donaire JA, Manzanera MJ, Molina A, González E, Nungaray N, Andrés A, Morales JM. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37(9): 3721 –3722.[CrossRef][Medline]

Huyghe E, Zairi A, Nohra J, Kamar N, Plante P, Rostaing L. Gonadal impact of target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) in male patients: an overview. Transpl Int. 2007; 20(4): 305 –311.[CrossRef][Medline]

Prem AR, Punekar SV, Kalpana M, Kelkar AR, Acharya VN. Male reproductive function in uraemia: efficacy of haemodialysis and renal transplantation. Br J Urol. 1996; 78(4): 635 –638.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rodrigues Netto N, Pecoraro G, Sabbaga E, Menezes de Góes G. Spermatogenesis before and after renal transplant. Int J Fertil. 1980; 25(2): 131 –133.[Medline]

Schover LR, Novick AC, Steinmuller DR, Goormastic M. Sexuality, fertility, and renal transplantation: a survey of survivors. J Sex Marital Ther. 1990; 16(1): 3 –13.[Medline]

Shrestha BM, Throssell D, McKane W, Raftery AT. Injury to a transplanted kidney during caesarean section: a case report. Exp Clin Transplant. 2007; 5(1): 618 –620.[Medline]

World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1999 .

Xu LG, Shi SF, Qi XP, Huang XF, Xu HM, et al. Morphological characteristics of spermatozoa before and after renal transplantation. Asian J Androl. 2005; 7(1): 81 –85.[Medline]

Xu LG, Xu HM, Song QZ, Qi XP, Wang XH, et al. Comparison of semen quality of male patients before and after renal transplantation. Chin J Urol. 2004; 25(6): 392 –394.

Zheng JH, Min ZK, Qiu XH, He CM, ZH YH. A survey of sexuality and fertility of male patients after renal transplantation. Nan Xing Xue Zhazi. 1995; 9(1): 4 –6.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/6/618    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, L.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, X.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu, L.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, X.-F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS