Journal of Andrology Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print June 20, 2008, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.108.005074
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 29, No. 5, September/October 2008
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005074

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/5/506    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radpour, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, X. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radpour, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, X. Y.

Review

Genetic Investigations of CFTR Mutations in Congenital Absence of Vas Deferens, Uterus, and Vagina as a Cause of Infertility

RAMIN RADPOUR*,{dagger}, HAMID GOURABI{dagger}, AHMAD VOSOUGH DIZAJ{dagger}, WOLFGANG HOLZGREVE* AND XIAO YAN ZHONG*

From the * Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital/Department of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland; and the {dagger} Department of Reproductive Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran.

Correspondence to: Dr Ramin Radpour, Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncolocy, Women's Hospital/Department of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland (e-mail: radpourr{at}uhbs.ch).
Received for publication February 8, 2008; accepted for publication June 9, 2008.

Abstract

A qualitative diagnosis of infertility requires attention to male and female physical abnormalities including endocrine anomalies and genetic conditions that interfere with reproduction. Many genes are likely to be involved in the complex process of reproduction. Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) is a genital form of cystic fibrosis (CF) that is responsible for 2%–6% of male infertility. The incidence of CF varies in different populations; therefore, the incidence of CBAVD will also vary in different populations. The spectrum and distribution of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations differ between CBAVD and CF patients and are comparable to control individuals. Combinations of particular alleles at several polymorphic loci yield insufficient functional CFTR protein. CFTR mutations are also associated with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina (CAUV). Females with CF are found to be less fertile than normal healthy women. Because of techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), CBAVD patients are now able to father children. Such couples, however, have an increased risk of having a child with cystic fibrosis, and therefore genetic testing and counseling should be provided. Around 10% of obstructive azoospermia is congenital and due to mutations in the CF gene. This review highlights the relationship of mutations in the CFTR gene with CBAVD and CAUV.



Aqualitative diagnosis of infertility requires attention to male and female physical abnormalities, endocrine anomalies (their hormonal and genetic background), and genetic conditions that interfere with reproduction. Many genes are likely to be involved in the complex process of reproduction (Mak et al, 2000). Genetic and nongenetic causes of infertility are increasingly being identified. Infertility, or at least subfertility, in males with cystic fibrosis (CF), was first suspected in the 1960s (Denning et al, 1968). Infertility in males with CF typically originates in developmental abnormalities in the vas deferens or the distal half of the epididymis. In 97%–98% of men with CF, a congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) blocks the transport of spermatozoa from testicular or epididymal structures to the outer genital tract, resulting in azoospermia (Van der Ven et al, 1996). Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations are also associated with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina (CAUV; Timmreck et al, 2003). Females with CF are found to be less fertile than normal healthy women. In CF females, malnutrition is the main cause of delayed puberty and amenorrhea (Josserand et al, 2001).

CFTR Gene Mutations and Polymorphisms

The main genetic causes of male infertility are micro-deletions of the Y chromosome (AZF region) connected with oligospermia or azoospermia, as well as mutations of the CFTR gene, which is connected with azoospermia and CBAVD (Dohle et al, 2002).

The CFTR gene contains 27 exons encompassing ~180 kb of DNA on chromosome band 7q31.2. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been found; the most important one lacks exon 9 sequences (Chu et al, 1993). The CFTR protein is a glycosylated transmembrane protein that functions as a chloride channel. CFTR is expressed in epithelial cells of exocrine tissues, such as the lungs, pancreas, sweat glands, and vas deferens. Apart from its chloride channel function, CFTR also functions as a regulator of, and is regulated by, other proteins (Egan et al, 1992).

More than 1500 CF-causing CFTR mutations have been identified (Table; Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium, 2007). Most mutations are point mutations. A CF patient can either carry an identical CFTR mutation on both CFTR alleles or 2 different CFTR mutations on both CFTR alleles. The distribution of CFTR mutations differs between different ethnic populations (Xu et al, 2007). The most common mutation, F508del, reaches frequencies of about 70% in Northern European populations, while lower frequencies are observed in Southern European populations. Besides F508del, other common mutations exist in most populations, each reaching frequencies of about 1%–2%. Examples include the G542X, G551D, R553X, W1282X, and N1303K mutations. Finally, for a given population, ethnic-specific mutations that reach frequencies of about 1%–2% might exist. For most populations, all these common mutations cover about 85%–95% of all mutant CFTR genes. The remaining group of mutant CFTR genes in a particular population comprises rare mutations, some of them only found in a single family.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Frequency of different types of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations in patients with cystic fibrosis and congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferensa
 

In CBAVD patients having 2 mutant CFTR alleles, at least 1 will be a mild mutation. In CBAVD patients in which a mutation is found on both CFTR genes, about 88% carry 1 severe mutation on 1 CFTR gene and a mild mutation on the second CFTR gene, and about 12% carry mild mutations on both CFTR genes (Claustres et al, 2000). This is in contrast to CF patients, where about 88% of the CF patients carry severe mutations on both CFTR genes, and about 11% carry a severe mutation on one CFTR gene and a mild mutation on their second CFTR gene (Claustres et al, 2000). The most frequent CFTR mutation conferring a mild phenotype found in CBAVD patients is the 5T polymorphism (Chillon et al, 1995). In Caucasians, the 5T polymorphism is found on about 21% of the CFTR genes derived from CBAVD patients, while it is only found on about 5% of the CFTR genes derived from control individuals. 5T is 1 of the alleles found at the polymorphic Tn locus in intron 8 of the CFTR gene. A stretch of 5, 7, or 9 thymidine residues is found at this locus. Less efficient splicing will occur when a lower number of thymidines are found (Figure 1), resulting in CFTR transcripts that lack exon 9 sequences (Chu et al, 1993). Alternatively, spliced CFTR transcripts lacking exon 9 sequences are found in any individual, but the extent varies depending on the alleles present at the Tn locus. In individuals homozygous for a 5T allele, up to 90% of the CFTR transcripts lack exon 9 (Chu et al, 1993). CFTR transcripts lacking exon 9 sequences result in CFTR proteins that do not mature (Delaney et al, 1993; Strong et al, 1993). When 5T is found in compound heterozygosity with a severe CFTR mutation, or even 5T, pathology such as CBAVD might be observed. However, not all males who are compound heterozygous for a severe CFTR mutation and 5T develop CBAVD (eg, some fathers of CF children). The 5T polymorphism was therefore classified as a disease mutation with partial penetrance (Cuppens et al, 1998). Different alleles in this locus can be found depending on the number of TG repeats. The higher number of TG repeats is associated with less efficient exon 9 splicing (Figure 1). The 5T polymorphism can be found in combination with a TG11, TG12, or TG13 allele (11, 12, or 13 TG repeats, respectively). In CBAVD patients, the milder TG11-5T allele is seldom found, while TG12-5T is the most frequently found genotype in CBAVD. The TG13-5T allele is rarer but is also found in CBAVD patients. TG13-5T might even result in pancreatic-sufficient CF, possibly because of additional polymorphisms that affect CFTR, such as V470. In individuals who are compound heterozygous for a severe mutation and the 5T allele, such as fathers of CF patients, 5T is associated with the milder TG11 allele.


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The effect of particular alleles on the amount of functional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). For different polymorphic loci (Tn and TGm) or haplotypes (TGm-Tn), the effect of each allele/haplotype on the amount of CFTR chloride channel activity is shown. Decreasing amounts of functional CFTR are obtained from top to bottom. CF indicates cystic fibrosis.

 

Depending on the effect at the protein level, CFTR mutations can be divided into at least 5 classes (Welsh and Smith, 1993; Wilschanski et al, 1995). Class I mutations result in no CFTR synthesis because of mutations affecting splice sites and nonsense mutations resulting in truncated CFTR protein, which are mostly unstable and therefore degraded, and in mutations shifting the coding frame in the gene (frameshift deletions and insertions). Class II mutations, such as the most common mutation F508del, result in CFTR proteins that fail to mature and are degraded. Class III mutations result in CFTR proteins that mature and therefore reach the apical membrane of the cell but provide abnormal regulatory properties of the chloride channel. Class IV mutations result in CFTR channels with abnormal conductive properties because of mutations in the conductivity pore. Finally, Class V mutations result in some functional CFTR proteins. Class I, II, and III mutations are severe mutations, while class IV and V mutations are known as mild mutations.

CFTR Protein and Molecular Determinants of the Channel Pore

The CFTR molecule is made up of 2 homologous repeats, each containing 6 transmembrane (TM) regions followed by an intracellular nucleotide-binding domain (NBD; Figure 2). These 2 halves are joined by an intracellular regulatory (R) domain. Recently, a low resolution crystal structure of CFTR was obtained (Rosenberg et al, 2004), which showed membrane-spanning regions lining a central pore, the pathway through which Cl ions cross the membrane. However, the identity of the TM regions forming the pore, or even the number of TMs that line the pore, cannot be identified in this structure. Nevertheless, homology with the structures of other ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins (Locher et al, 2002; Rosenberg et al, 2005) suggests that the CFTR pore is lined with multiple {alpha}-helical TM regions in a reasonably parallel fashion. This overall pore architecture is common with ligand-gated Cl channels (Unwin 2003; Cascio 2004) but is in stark contrast to the seemingly haphazard arrangement of membrane-associated {alpha}-helices observed in Cl channels (Dutzler et al, 2002).


Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Topology of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. CFTR comprises 12 TM regions (organized into 2 groups of 6), 2 intracellular nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs), and the intracellular regulatory (R) domain.

 
CFTR Gene and Development of the Vas Deferens

Given the fact that CFTR mutations are detected in men with CBAVD and, with a lower frequency, in men with unilateral absence of vas deferens (CUAVD), it appears that a normal amount of functional CFTR protein is required to ensure proper development of the vas deferens. However, the lack of CFTR mutations detected in CBAVD with renal abnormalities also suggests that the mesonephric duct plays an important role in the development of the vas deferens. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that the CFTR protein is required at some specific embryonic stage of the development of the vas deferens. Tizzano et al (1993) studied human fetuses from 10–33 weeks gestation and found that low CFTR expression was present in the epithelium of the epididymis at all stages. The detection of CFTR mRNA in human fetuses suggests that CFTR acts as a chloride channel in the development of the reproductive tissues (Tizzano et al).

Recently, the relationship between CFTR mutations and the congenital absence of the uterus and vagina (CAUV), which affects 1 in 5000 females, was examined upon the rationale that the embryological development of the müllerian ducts directly depends on the prior normal development of the wolffian ducts (Timmreck et al, 2003). Samples from 25 patients with CAUV were tested for the 33 most common CFTR mutations, including the 5T allele. The data suggested that it is unlikely for CFTR mutations to cause CAUV in females (Timmreck et al, 2003). Finding that CFTR mutations are associated with 80% of cases of CBAVD, a wolffian duct anomaly, but are not associated with CAUV, a müllerian duct anomaly, provides further evidence on the timing of CFTR damage in CBAVD. The effects of the CFTR mutations on the wolffian duct derivatives must occur after the ninth week of embryological development, at a time when the wolffian and müllerian ducts have completely separated and are developing independently.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Cystic Fibrosis

Analyses of the correlation between phenotype and genotype showed that the CFTR mutations could be grouped into 2 categories, mild or severe, with respect to pancreatic function (Kristidis et al, 1992). The severe mutations are associated with pancreatic insufficiency, whereas the mild mutations, leading to a higher residual CFTR activity, confer pancreatic sufficiency (Kristidis et al, 1992). A CF patient is likely to be pancreatic-sufficient if he has 1 or 2 mild mutations.


Figure 3
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutation spectrum of Iranian patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. This picture shows the panel of 19 different mutations with their frequency of occurrence in our studied population (Radpour et al, 2007).

 
Discordant Familial Segregation of Alleles in Patients With CBAVD

Familial studies are another approach to studying the possibility of genetic heterogeneity. In families with CBAVD linked to CFTR mutations, brothers with CBAVD should inherit the same CFTR genes from their parents, whereas fertile male siblings should have at least 1 CFTR gene different from their CBAVD brothers. In families with CBAVD not linked to CFTR defects, the inheritance of the CFTR genes should be random with respect to the CBAVD phenotype. Familial segregation of CFTR genes can be assessed by studying polymorphisms within and around the CFTR gene. The combination of alleles at the polymorphic sites (haplotypes) allows one to follow transmission of CFTR genes from parents to children in the pedigrees. Three families with no identified CFTR mutations have been reported in which either the brothers with CBAVD inherited 2 different alleles from one of their parents (Rave-Harel et al, 1995), or fertile brothers inherited the same CFTR alleles as their brothers with CBAVD. Such discordance between phenotypes and marker haplotypes suggested that CBAVD was not caused by 2 mutated CFTR alleles but was rather the result of mutations at other hypothetic loci (Mercier et al, 1995). However, such cases could also be explained by unidentified CFTR mutations that have a more complex pattern of penetrance. Nevertheless, 15%–20% of patients with CBAVD who have been extensively screened and do not have CFTR mutations or the 5T allele may indicate a subpopulation of men with other genes responsible for the reproductive anomaly.

Males With CFTR Mutations (CBAVD Males)

The majority of adult males with CF (99%) have CBAVD. CBAVD is also encountered in 1%–2% of infertile males without cystic fibrosis (Blau et al, 2002). Men with CBAVD but without CF gene mutations have a high incidence of urinary tract malformations (Dork et al, 1997). The group with urinary tract anomalies represents a separate clinical entity not related to CF and has different embryological pathogenesis. Some forms of infertility found in otherwise healthy men have also been reported to be associated with CFTR mutations, especially obstructive azoospermic conditions such as CBAVD, CUAVD, or epididymal obstruction and bilateral ejaculatory duct obstruction with concomitant seminal vesicle anomalies (Welsh and Smith et al, 1995). CBAVD is caused by a disruption in the vas deferens, a wolffian duct derivative. In a widespread study of CBAVD in Iran, including 120 cases of men with CBAVD, the analysis of the entire coding sequences of CFTR gene allowed us to identify 19 different mutations in Iranian CBAVD patients (Figure 3). These mutations have been described previously in Iranian patients with CBAVD (Radpour et al, 2006a and 2006b). Of those, 5 cases were homozygous or compound heterozygous (+/+), 67 had only one mutation (+/–), and 49 cases had neither mutation (–/–; IVS8-5T was not involved). The result of our study reflects the high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene mutations, although 2 mutations, IVS8-5T and F508del, were found to be more common in Iranian CBAVD patients. IVS8-5T was observed with TG12 or TG13 haplotypes on 61 chromosomes, thus confirming the association of this splice site variant with CBAVD in Iranian patients. Screening for IVS8-5T and F508del together led to the identification of more than one-third of alleles. All of the patients with completely resolved mutation genotypes carried a missense or splicing mutation on at least 1 allele, but in 3 cases we found 1 nonsense mutation (Radpour et al, 2007, 2008). The diagnosis of CBAVD is based on the presence of azoospermia in subjects with normal or small size testes, nonpalpable vas deferens, and the characteristic ultrasonographic view and changes in the physical and biochemical properties of ejaculate (ie, small volume, low pH, and low fructose concentration). Genital abnormalities may occur early in CF but are less commonly diagnosed than in adults. They are found more often in pancreatic-insufficient than in pancreatic-sufficient CF patients (Blau et al, 2002).

In up to 20% of the CBAVD patients, absence of the vas deferens is associated with renal malformations. In a small study, this CBAVD etiology was suggested not to be related to CFTR mutations, as no CFTR mutation could be identified in this group of 10 CBAVD patients (Augarten et al, 1994). However, in a more recent study, 2 of 4 CBAVD patients with only 1 kidney were carriers of a CFTR mutation; 1 of them was even compound heterozygous for F508del and 5T (Daudin et al, 2000).

Involvement of CFTR in Forms of Male Infertility Other Than CBAVD

There are reports that CFTR is also involved in forms of infertility other than CBAVD. In a small study of 17 patients with obstructive azoospermia in which the vas deferens and/or epididymis was present but obstructed, a mutation in the CFTR gene was identified in 8 of 34 (23.5%) CFTR genes (Jarvi et al, 1995). It should be noted that 5 of the 8 mutant CFTR genes carried the 5T allele. In another study, 14 of 80 (17.5%) men with a variety of diagnoses varying from oligozoospermia to oligoasthenoteratozoospermia carried a CFTR mutation (Timmreck et al, 2003). However, in another report, 75 patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia were studied, and the frequency of CFTR mutations was not significantly different from the control population (Tuerlings et al, 1998). The involvement of CFTR in forms of male infertility other than CBAVD is thus not clear and needs to be further investigated. Indeed, CFTR is regulated during the generation of spermatozoa (Trezise et al, 1993). Here, CFTR transcripts are confined to postmeiotic round spermatids. During this development stage, haploid spermatids are converted into spermatozoa. Nucleus condensation and decrease in cytoplasm volume, which are thought to be caused by reduction of intracellular water content, occur in this phase. Maximal CFTR expression precedes this stage. It cannot therefore be excluded that very mild functional CFTR polymorphisms are still involved in forms of male infertility other than CBAVD.

Females With CFTR Mutations (CAUV Females)

Females with CF are found to be less fertile than normal healthy women. In CF females, malnutrition is the main cause of delayed puberty and amenorrhea (Josserand et al, 2001). Delayed pubertal increments of serum gonadotrophin and sex steroids suggest late maturation of the reproductive endocrine system. The patients who were homozygous for the most common mutation, F508del, and those with pathological oral glucose tolerance tests were significantly delayed in menarchal age. The majority of the patients had essential fatty deficiency, which may cause pubertal delay (Johannesson et al, 1997).

The low fertility in CF females is known to be caused mainly by tenacious impermeable cervical mucus, which does not undergo the typical changes during menstrual cycle because of defective CFTR protein expressed in the cervix (Johannesson et al, 1998). Some CF women do not ovulate. They have higher total serum testosterone concentration and signs of insulin resistance similar to those found in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Anovulation due to malnutrition and catabolism has been suggested as a secondary cause of infertility. CF patients might have inflammation in their tissues prior to infection with an imbalance of proinflammatory cytokines versus the anti-inflammatory ones. CFTR might increase acidification of synaptic vesicles, and for that reason, it plays an important role in central regulation of sexual maturation and fertility (Johannesson et al, 1997). Ovulation in these chronically ill women may also be influenced by physiologic and psychologic stress. CFTR mutations are associated with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina as well (CAUV; Timmreck et al, 2003). Since the embryologic development of the müllerian ducts directly depends on the prior normal development of the wolffian ducts, the same gene products may be necessary for normal embryologic development of both ducts' systems.

The incidence of the 33 CFTR mutations found in the patients with CAUV (8%) was twice as high as that found in the general population (4%) but much less than the incidence of CFTR mutations in men with CBAVD (80%). These data suggest that it is unlikely for CFTR mutations to cause CAUV in females in the same way as they cause CBAVD in males. Furthermore, the data suggest that CAUV in females may be the same disorder as CBAVD in males who do not have CFTR mutations. The National Institutes of Health recommends genetic counseling for any couple attempting assisted reproductive techniques when the man has CF or obstructive azoospermia and is positive for a CF mutation (Sokol, 2001). Clinical genetic conditions of a family considering assisted reproduction of infertility can be established by evaluating the full family history and by documenting pregnancy and fetal, neonatal, and pediatric loss of life, as well as by cytogenetic studies of the couple and DNA mutation analysis for cystic fibrosis mutations.


Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Risk calculation and phenotype prediction in males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD; risk is calculated with an assumption of a cystic fibrosis [CF] carrier frequency of 1 in 25; Claustres et al, 2005).

 
Assisted Reproduction in CBAVD Couples and the Risk of Having CF Children

Because of techniques such as ICSI, CBAVD patients nowadays are able to father children. However, if sperm cells of a CBAVD patient are used in an ICSI program, there is an increased risk of having a child with CF. Indeed, most CBAVD patients carry a severe CF-causing CFTR mutation, and therefore have a 0.5% chance of transmitting the CF-causing CFTR mutation to the child. Assuming a risk of 1/25 of the partner being a CF carrier, and a carrier, with a chance of 0.5% of transmitting the mutant CFTR gene to the child, the combined risk of CBAVD couples of having a CF child is 1/100 (compared with a risk of 1/2500 in the control population). Genetic counseling should therefore be provided to such CBAVD couples, and the partner should be tested for CFTR mutations in order to determine the risk of having a CF child. However, given the fact that most CFTR genetic tests only analyze the most common CF-causing CFTR mutations, the carrier status of the partner may remain undetected. Assuming that the genetic tests most routinely used have a sensitivity of about 90%, when no mutation is found with the test, the partner still has a risk of being a carrier of 1/250, and therefore the CBAVD couple has still a risk of 1/1000 of having a CF child. It should be noted that most genetic tests for CFTR mutations, especially commercial tests, screen only for the most frequent CF causing mutations and not the milder rare mutations, therefore resulting in a CFTR mutation detection rate of only about 60% in CBAVD patients (Claustres et al, 2000).

Risk of CF, CBAVD, or CFTR-opathies for Offspring

For a couple with CBAVD associated with CFTR defects planning to have its own genetic children, the risk for both male and female offspring of having CF or related diseases, and for male offspring of having CBAVD, depends on whether or not the female partner is a carrier, since 1 mutated allele will always be inherited from the male. As the carrier frequency of CFTR mutations in many Caucasian populations is in the order of 1/22 to 1/30, it is highly recommended that genetic testing for CFTR mutations be offered to the couple prior to ICSI. The genetic counselor should determine whether there is a family history of CF and determine the couple's ethnicity, as this will affect their carrier risk. The genetic aspect of CBAVD is more complex than in CF, since (1) genetic analysis is able to prove but not to exclude the diagnosis of a genital form of CF, and (2) the risk of CF or CBAVD in the offspring may be unpredictable when rare mutations are identified in the male or the female. The couple should be informed that the test cannot detect all mutations within the gene. Therefore, a negative mutation screen reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of being a carrier (Figure 4).


Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr Mohamad Ali Sedighi Gilani, Dr Reza Samani, and Mr Kamal Alizadeh for their cooperation on this work and Mrs Regan Geissmann for proofreading the text.


References

Augarten A, Yahav Y, Kerem BS, Halle D, Laufer J, Szeinberg A, Dor J, Mashiach S, Gazit E, Madgar I. Congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens in the absence of cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1994; 344: 1473 –1474.[CrossRef][Medline]

Blau H, Freud E, Mussaffi H. Urogenital abnormalities in male children with cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child. 2002; 87: 135 –138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cascio M. Structure and function of the glycine receptor and related nicotinicoid receptors. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 19383 –19386.[Free Full Text]

Chillon M, Casals T, Mercier B, Bassas L, Lissens W, Silber S, Romey MC, Ruiz-Romero J, Verlingue C, Claustres M, Nunes V, Férec C, Estivill X. Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. New Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 1475 –1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chu CS, Trapnell BC, Curristin S, Cutting GR, Crystal RG. Genetic basis of variable exon 9 skipping in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mRNA. Nat Genet. 1993; 3: 151 –156.[CrossRef][Medline]

Claustres M, Guittard C, Bozon D, Chevalier F, Verlingue C, et al. Spectrum of CFTR mutations in cystic fibrosis and in congenital absence of the vas deferens in France. Hum Mut. 2000; 16: 143 –156.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cuppens H, Lin W, Jaspers M, Costes B, Teng H, Vankeerberghen A, Jorissen M, Droogmans G, Reynaert I, Goossens M, Nilius B, Cassiman JJ. Polyvariant mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator genes–the polymorphic (TG)m locus explains the partial penetrance of the 5T polymorphism as a disease mutation. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 487 –496.[Medline]

Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium. Cystic fibrosis mutation database. http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca. Updated March 2, 2007. Accessed June 30, 2008.

Daudin M, Bieth E, Bujan L, Massat G, Pontonnier F, Mieusset R. Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: clinical characteristics, biological parameters, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations, and implications for genetic counseling. Fertil Steril. 2000;74: 1164 –1174.[CrossRef][Medline]

Delaney SJ, Rich DP, Thomson SA, Hargrave MR, Lovelock PK, Welsh MJ, Wainwright BJ. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator splice variants are not conserved and fail to produce chloride channels. Nat Genet. 1993;4: 426 –431.[CrossRef][Medline]

Denning CR, Sommers SC, Quigley HJ. Infertility in male patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 1968; 41: 7 –17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dohle GR, Halley DJJ, Van Hemel JO, van den Ouwel AMW, Pieters MHEC, Weber RFA, Govaerts LCP. Genetic risk factors in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 13 –16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dork T, Dworniczak B, Aulehla-Scholz C, Wieczorek D, Bohm I, Mayerova A, Seydewitz HH, Nieschlag E, Meschede D, Horst J, Pander HJ, Sperling H, Ratjen F, Passarge E, Schmidtke J, Stuhrmann M. Distinct spectrum of CFTR gene mutations in congenital absence of vas deferens. Hum Genet. 1997;100: 365 –377.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dutzler R, Campbell EB, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. X-ray structure of a ClC chloride channel at 3.0 A_reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity. Nature. 2002; 415: 287 –294.[CrossRef][Medline]

Egan M, Flotte T, Afione S, Solow R, Zeitlin PL, Carter BJ, Guggino WB. Defective regulation of outwardly rectifying Cl channels by protein kinase A corrected by insertion of CFTR. Nature. 1992;358: 581 –584.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jarvi K, Zielenski J, Wilschanski M, Durie P, Buckspan M, Tullis E, Markiewicz D, Tsui LC. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and obstructive azoospermia. Lancet. 1995; 345: 1578 .[CrossRef][Medline]

Johannesson M, Bogdanovic N, Nordqvist AC, Hjelte L, Schalling M. Cystic Fibrosis mRNA expression in rat brain: cerebral cortex and preoptic area. Neuroreport. 1997; 8: 535 –539.[Medline]

Johannesson M, Landgren BM, Csemiczky G, Hjelte L, Gottlieb C. Female patients with cystic fibrosis suffer from reproductive endocrinological disorders despite good clinical status. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 2092 –2097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Josserand RN, Bey-Omar F, Rollet J, Lejeune H, Boggio D, Durand DV, Durieu I. Cystic fibrosis phenotype evaluation and paternity outcome in 50 males with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens. Hum Reprod. 2001;16: 2093 –2097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kristidis P, Bozon D, Corey M, Markiewicz D, Rommens J, Tsui LC, Durie P. Genetic determination of exocrine pancreatic function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1992; 50: 1178 –1184.[Medline]

Locher KP, Lee AT, Rees DC. The E. coli BtuCD structure. A framework for ABC transporter architecture and mechanism. Science. 2002;296: 1091 –1098.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mak V, Zielenski J, Tsui LC, Durie P, Zini A, Martin S, Longley TB, Jarvi KA. Cystic fibrosis gene mutations and infertile men with primary testicular failure. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 436 –439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mercier B, Verlingue C, Lissens W, Silber SJ, Novelli G, Bonduelle M, Audrézet MP, Férec C. Is congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens a primary form of cystic fibrosis? Analyses of the CFTR gene in 67 patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 56: 272 –277.[Medline]

Radpour R, Gilani MA, Gourabi H, Dizaj AV, Mollamohamadi S. Molecular analysis of the IVS8-T splice variant 5T and M470V exon 10 missense polymorphism in Iranian males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006a; 12: 469 –473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Radpour R, Gourabi H, Gilani MA, Dizaj AV. Correlation between CFTR gene mutations in Iranian men with congenital absence of the vas deferens and anatomical genital phenotype. J Androl. 2008; 29: 35 –40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Radpour R, Gourabi H, Gilani MA, Dizaj AV, Rezaee M, Mollamohamadi S. Two novel missense and one novel nonsense CFTR mutations in Iranian males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006b;12: 717 –721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Radpour R, Gourabi H, Sadighi Gilani MA, Vosough Dizaj A. Molecular study of (TG)m(T)n polymorphism in Iranian males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. J Androl. 2007; 28: 541 –547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rave-Harel N, Madgar I, Goshen R, Nissim-Rafinia M, Ziadni A, Rahat A, Chiba O, Kalman YM, Brautbar C, Levinson D, et al. CFTR haplotype analysis reveals genetic heterogeneity in the etiology of congenital bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 56: 1359 –1366.[Medline]

Rosenberg MF, Callaghan R, Modok S, Higgins CF, Ford RC. Three-dimensional structure of P-glycoprotein. The transmembrane regions adopt an asymmetric configuration in the nucleotide-bound state. J Biol Chem. 2004;280: 2857 –2862.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rosenberg MF, Kamis AB, Aleksandrov LA, Ford RC, Riordan JR. Purification and crystallization of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). J Biol Chem. 2005; 279: 39051 –39057.[CrossRef]

Sokol RZ. Infertility in men with cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001;7: 421 –426.[CrossRef][Medline]

Strong TV, Wilkinson DJ, Mansoura MK, Devor DC, Henze K, Yang Y, Wilson JM, Cohn JA, Dawson DC, Frizzell RA, Collins FS. Expression of an abundant alternatively spliced form of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene is not associated with a cAMP-activated chloride conductance. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2: 225 –230..[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Timmreck LS, Gray MR, Handelin B, Allito B, Rohlfs E, Davis AJ, Gidwani G, Reindollar RH. Analysis of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations in patients with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina. Am J Med Genet. 2003; 120: 72 –76.

Tizzano EF, Chitayat D, Buchwald M. Cell-specific localization of CFTR mRNA shows developmentally regulated expression m human fetal tissues. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2: 219 –224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trezise A, Linder C, Grieger D, Thompson E, Meunier H, Griswold M, Buchwald M. CFTR expression is regulated during both the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and the oestrous cycle of rodents. Nat Genet. 1993;3: 157 –164.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tuerlings JHAM, Mol B, Kremer JAM, Looman M, Meuleman EJH, Te Meerman GJ, Buys CHCM, Merkus HMWM, Scheffer H. Mutation frequency of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator is not increased in oligozoospermic male candidates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69: 899 –903.[CrossRef][Medline]

Unwin N. Structure and action of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor explored by electron microscopy. FEBS Letts. 2003; 555: 91 –95.[CrossRef][Medline]

Van der Ven K, Messer L, Van der Ven H, Jeyendran RS, Ober C. Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in healthy men with reduced sperm quality. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 513 –517.[Medline]

Welsh MJ, Smith AE. Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. Cell. 1993; 73: 1251 –1254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Welsh MJ, Smith AE. Cystic fibrosis. Scientific American. 1995;273: 52 –59.[Medline]

Wilschanski M, Zielenski J, Markiewicz D, Tsui LC, Corey M, Levison H, Durie PR. Correlation of sweat chloride concentration with classes of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations. J Pediatr. 1995; 127: 705 –710.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xu WM, Shi QX, Chen WY, Zhou CX, Ni Y, Rowlands DK, Yi Liu G, Zhu H, Ma ZG, Wang XF, Chen ZH, Zhou SC, Dong HS, Zhang XH, Chung YW, Yuan YY, Yang WX, Chan HC. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is vital to sperm fertilizing capacity and male fertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104: 9816 –9821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/5/506    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radpour, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, X. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radpour, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, X. Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS