Journal of Andrology Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Epididymis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Right arrow Return to article

Table. Summary of literature on DSP per man, DSP per gram testis parenchyma, and paired testes weighta
  Age Range, yr, or Race
  DSP/2 Testes 95% CI, millions
  DSP/g Parenchyma 95% CI, millions
  No. of men
  Weight 2 Testes Parenchyma 95% CI, g
  Cells Enumerated
  Time Divisor, d
  Reference
  Homogenization of unfixed testes
      26-38   82-156   3.4-5.5   23   16-39   Sd1 + Sd2   7.9   Amann and Howards (1980)
      21-50   137-181   4.7-6.1   89   28-31   Sd2   2.9   Johnson et al (1984b)
      51-80   77-150   2.8-4.7   43   25-32   Sd2   2.9  
      20-79   120-225   4.2-6.8   38   27-33   Sd2   2.9   Johnson and Varner (1988)
  Homogenization of fixed tissues
      26-53   na   3.7-7.3   10   28-40   Sa + Sb   8.9   Johnson et al (1981)
    na   4.0-7.6     As above   Sd1 + Sd2   7.9  
      20-48   201-283   5.6-6.8   37   40-49   Sa + Sb   8.9   Johnson et al (1984a)
      50-85   126-194   3.8-5.4   34   29-36   Sa + Sb   8.9  
      20-48   225-275   5.2-6.8   28   37-44   Sa + Sb   8.9   Johnson et al (1986)
      50-90   96-146   3.2-4.4   28   28-35   Sa + Sb   8.9  
      20-48   na   5.5-8.9   15   na   Sa + Sb   8.9   Johnson et al (1987)
      52-90   na   1.6-5.2   15   na   Sa + Sb   8.9  
  Morphometric analyses (toluidine blue-stained Epon sections)
      24-57   168-279   2.9-14.0   3   na   Spherical   8.9   Johnson et al (1980a)
      26-53   62-139   3.9-7.9   10   28-40   Spherical   8.9   Johnson et al (1981)
      20-39   Na   4.6-6.3   17   na   Spherical   8.9   Johnson et al (1990)
  Average for fixed homogenates & morphometric data
      Chinese   70-173   3.4-6.9   12   22-33   Spherical   8.9   Johnson et al (1998)
      Hispanic   231-398   5.2-8.9   8   43-61   Spherical   8.9  
      White
  193-318
  5.5-8.8
  12
  38-46
  Spherical
  8.9
 

  Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DSP, daily sperm production.
  aIn some cases, approximate values for 95% CIs were calculated from graphic presentations of means and standard errors. Three early reports were excluded because data were combined in Johnson et al (1984b). It is possible that some individuals were included in more than 1 listed study.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS