Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print March 6, 2008, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.107.004465
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 29, No. 4, July/August 2008
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.107.004465

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/4/418    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. L.

Bovine Sertoli Cells Colonize and Form Tubules in Murine Hosts Following Transplantation and Grafting Procedures

ZHEN ZHANG*,{dagger}, JON HILL{dagger}, MICHAEL HOLLAND*,{ddagger}, YASUYUKI KURIHARA§ AND KATE L. LOVELAND*,{ddagger}

From the * Center for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; {dagger} CSIRO Livestock Industries, Armidale, Australia; {ddagger} Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, Australia; and § Department, of Environment and Natural Sciences, Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.

Correspondence to: Dr Zhen Zhang, Center for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, 27–31 Wright St Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia (e-mail: zhen.zhang{at}med.monash.edu.au).
Received for publication November 2, 2007; accepted for publication February 5, 2008.

   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The contribution of somatic cells to nonrodent male germ cell transplantation success has not been well established due to lack of cell type-specific markers to distinguish donor cells from host cells. In the present study, we first screened antibodies and a lectin to identify markers suitable for unequivocal distinction between germ cells and Sertoli cells in bovine testes compared with mouse testes. Anti-vimentin and the Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) lectin detected only bovine Sertoli cells and spermatogonia, respectively; anti-NONO and anti-GCNA1 detected only mouse Sertoli and germ cells, respectively. The outcome of transplanting bovine testis cells into nude mouse testes was then studied using these markers. Our results clearly showed that immature bovine Sertoli cells survive and colonize mouse testes at 2.5 months after transplantation and that tubular structures composed of donor Sertoli cells formed adjacent to murine tubules within the host mouse testis. Bovine germ cell colonization and survival in mouse testes after transplantation were confirmed, but this was restricted to areas of bovine Sertoli cell colonization. In addition, ectopic grafts of intact bovine testis tissue and cell aggregates from hanging drop cultures were placed under the back skin and testis capsule of nude mice. Bovine Sertoli cells in ectopic grafts and aggregates were able to form tubular structures, and some bovine germ cells were observed around 2 months after implantation. This study therefore identifies a practical strategy to assess the outcome of testicular cell transplantation using different antibodies and a lectin to distinguish bovine cells from mouse cells. It identifies an approach that can readily be adapted to study other nonrodent species.

     Key words: Bovine spermatogonia, cell aggregates, xenotransplantation, antibodies



Testicular germ cell transplantation was first developed in 1994 (Brinster and Zimmermann, 1994) as a functional assay to identify spermatogenic stem cells and study their behavioral interaction within the niche created by testicular somatic cells. This opened a new avenue for basic research in spermatogenesis, and great successes have been achieved in combination with cell culture and in vitro genetic modification (Brinster, 2007). Although much of the progress relating to successful male germ cell transplantation is derived from work with rodents, this technique has been applied or considered for application in industry and clinics (Dobrinski and Travis, 2007; van den Berg et al, 2007).

Clinical trials for human germ cell transplantation after cancer therapy have been reported as underway (Radford et al, 1999), but no outcome has been described yet. Germ cell transplantation has been extended into several other species including some livestock (ie, goats, pigs, and bulls; Hill and Dobrinski, 2006). In one encouraging success, a donor germ cellsired offspring was produced following a goat-to-goat germ cell transplantation (Honaramooz et al, 2003). Transplantation between species (xenotransplantation) has yielded variable success. Reciprocal transplantation between mice and rats appears to work, but the mouse testis seems unable to support domestic animal spermatogenesis (Dobrinski et al, 2000; Izadyar et al, 2002b; Oatley et al, 2002). Nonrodent donor cells rarely develop beyond spermatogonia in recipient mouse testes, indicating either that there are factors that support foreign germ cell development that are lacking in the mouse testis, or alternatively, the mouse testis contains factors that prevent the differentiation of nonrodent germ cells. Resolution of these issues is required to develop germ cell xenotransplantation into a useful experimental and ultimately commercial option. The bovine model is a large animal model that may provide key information on both these issues.

A critical requirement for assessing the success of male germ cell transplantation in nonrodent species is the ability to distinguish donor cells from host cells after transplantation. In rodents, this has largely been overcome by the use of rodent cells expressing either green fluorescent protein or β-galactosidase (Tan, 1991; Nakanishi et al, 1999). When cells without a marker are transplanted into a mutant mouse lacking endogenous spermatogenesis, such as the W strain, any subsequent spermatogenesis can be deduced as arising from donor cells (Ogawa et al, 2000; Ohta et al, 2000). Transplantation between different inbred rat strains with distinct fur colors also makes it relatively easy to assess transplant success using DNA microsatellite analysis and inspection of offspring (Zhang et al, 2003).

The colonization of bull donor cells after transplantation into busulfan-treated or irradiated testes of nude mice has been assessed using a species-specific antibody (Dobrinski et al, 2000), anti-PGP9.5 antibody (Oatley et al, 2004b), the lectin DBA as a species-specific gonocyte marker (Izadyar et al, 2002b; Izadyar et al, 2003; Goel et al, 2007), or a vital cell dye, PKH26 (Honaramooz et al, 2002). However, since all donor cells used for the bull-to-mouse transplantation were collected from immature animals, the donor cell population would have contained immature somatic cells, such as peritubular myoid cells and Sertoli cells, which could proliferate in the host testes. Whether bull germ cells formed colonies in mouse hosts that contained bovine somatic cells was not clarified. This highlights the need to identify suitable reagents for the precise identification of both donor and recipient germ and somatic cell types following transplantation of bull testicular cells into recipient mice. Our previous studies have demonstrated the value of species-specific antibody reactivity in distinguishing donor cells and host cells (Zhang et al, 2006, 2007).

In the present study, we first screened antibodies previously shown in rodents to react specifically with Sertoli cells, germ cells, or peritubular myoid cells for their capacity to serve as cell-specific markers in developing and adult bull testes. Then we performed culture, grafting, and transplantation studies using isolated bovine testicular cells or tissue fragments into mouse recipients. Evaluation using those antibodies allowed accurate identification of specific bovine testicular cell types following these experiments, providing clear evidence that immature bovine Sertoli cells colonize and form tubular structures in the mouse testes after transplantation and after grafting. These outcomes provide a solid platform for future studies involving xenotransplantation.


   Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All chemicals were supplied by Sigma Chemical Company (St Louis, Missouri) unless otherwise stated.

Animals and Tissue Collection

Bovine testes were obtained from 8 prepubertal (2–4 mo old) Bos taurus bull calves (Holstein and Angus breeds) for use in culture, explant, and transplant experiments (CSIRO Cattle Breeding Laboratory, Armidale, Australia). Testes from animals of this age are expected to weigh less than 25 grams, with the most advanced germ cell-type spermatogonia or gonocytes (Herrid et al, 2006). Testes were collected by castration under general anesthetic (0.1 mg/kg xylazine, followed by 3 mg/kg ketamine), washed in sterile Dulbecco phospate-buffered saline (DPBS; GIBCO, Carlsbad, California), then maintained on ice overnight in PBS with antibiotics. Samples from these animals and from 1 adult Bos taurus bull (Angus breed) were also used for immunohistochemistry. The adult bull testis was collected from an abattoir and delivered to the laboratory within 2 hours.

CBA or BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Monash Central Animal Services and maintained in the low barrier animal house of Monash Medical Centre (Clayton, Australia). All investigations conformed to the NHMRC/CSIRO/AAC Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Experimental Purposes and were approved by the Monash University Standing Committee on Ethics in Animal Experimentation or by the CSIRO Animal Ethics Committee, Armidale, Australia.

Upon delivery to the laboratory, the testis was rinsed 3 times with sterile DPBS and weighed. The tunica albuginea was removed, connective tissues were excised, and the testis was cut into small (0.5 cm3) fragments. These were used for fresh cell and tissue fragment collections (only for immature testes) and for histologic studies by fixing fragments in Bouin fixative or 4% paraformaldehyde solutions at 4°C overnight.

Cell Collection and Culture

Approximately 1–10 g of bovine testis tissue was dissociated into cell suspensions using methods described previously (Zhang et al, 2003) with minor modifications. Briefly, tissues were incubated in 0.1% collagenase, 0.05% hyaluronidase, and 0.05% DNase I in Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium/F12 medium (DMEM/F12 medium; GIBCO) for 20 minutes twice at 35°C in a shaking water bath. Between steps, tubules were allowed to settle, then the medium containing the enzymes was replaced following 2 further rinses with calcium-free DPBS. Single tubules were digested in 0.075% trypsin in DPBS containing 1 mM EDTA and DNase I for 10 minutes at 35°C in a shaking water bath. The cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in DMEM/F12 medium. After cell counting, these fresh bovine testicular cells were used for cell aggregation culture or left on ice prior to transplantation.

Individual drops of 30 µL of the final cell suspension containing an average of 42 x 104 primary bovine cells (between 11.4 x 104 and 64.4 x 104; n = 3) were placed onto the cover of a 100-mm Petri dish, with 25–30 drops loaded per dish. The cover was inverted and placed over the bottom of the Petri dish containing sterile water. These hanging drops were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air for a maximum of 7 days without medium change. The cultured aggregates were used for grafts into the testis and under the back skin of nude mice. Aggregates were examined by immunocytochemistry after fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight.

Tissue Culture

Tunica-free fragments of around 2–3 mm3 were cultured on a 0.4 µm-pore cell culture insert membrane (Falcon; BD Biosciences, North Ryde, Australia) floating on medium at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air. The medium was changed every 3 days. The cultured tissue fragments were used for xenografts and for immunohistochemistry after fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight.

Preparation of Recipient Mice, Donor Cells, and Cell Transfer

Nude mice (6–8 wk old) were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with a single dose of busulfan at 30–35 mg/kg. Preparation of busulfan solution was as described previously (Zhang et al, 2007). Mice were used as recipients for germ cell transplantation 4–6 weeks after busulfan injection.

Freshly dispersed bovine testicular cells were combined with trypan blue (0.02%–0.04%). The final cell concentration for each experiment is listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Bovine sertoli and spermatogonia cells colonized tubules in 3 mouse testesa
 

Injection of cells was performed as described previously (Zhang et al, 2006, 2007). Recipient mice were anesthetized by peritoneal injection of Avertin (20 mg/mL, 0.3 mL/per adult mouse). The testis was exposed via lower central abdominal incision. Each testis was injected with 10–15 µL of donor cells. Recipient mice were killed 2–3 months after transplantation. The recipient testes were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight.

Grafts of Tissue Fragments or Hanging Drop Cell Aggregates

Two to 3 linear incisions of about 0.5 cm were made on each side of the midline in the dorsal skin of the anesthetized recipient mouse. A small space was made within the fascia by blunt dissection under the incision. The fresh or cultured tissues or cell aggregates were implanted into the spaces under the skin. One to 3 tissue fragments or 10–16 hanging drops were implanted in each site, and the incision site was closed by suturing. Grafts with tissues from 5 different donors were performed on 3 different days into 4 recipients (Table 2). Two mice were castrated at the same time they were used as recipients. Hanging drop aggregates were also grafted into the testes of a nude mouse. For this mouse, the incision was made in the low-middle abdomen, and the testes were exposed. A very small hole was made on the testis tunica using a surgical blade, and 6–10 aggregates were inserted within the interstitial space under a dissecting microscope. The tunica incision was not sutured, but the abdominal incision was sutured. Recipient mice were killed 2–3 months later, and the grafts on the back and the testes containing cell aggregate grafts were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Grafts of bovine testis fragment and cell aggregates into mouse
 

Immunohistologic Assessment

For histologic analysis, the fixed tissues were rinsed 3 times in 70% (vol/vol) ethanol followed by routine processing and paraffin embedding. Serial sections of 4–5 µm thick were prepared using routine dewaxing and rehydration procedures. Antigen retrieval was performed in 0.01M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) by heating in a microwave using full power for 3 minutes, then 70% power for 6 minutes. Sections were allowed to cool for 1 hour. All sections were treated for 10 minutes with 0.1% Triton X-100 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). To reduce nonspecific background staining, sections were treated with 10% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin in TBS for 4 hours or with a blocking reagent solution (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana) for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT) following the manufacturer's instructions. Sections were then incubated with 1 or 2 different primary antibodies (see Table 3) at 4°C overnight, followed by application of secondary antibodies at RT for 30–60 minutes. For immunohistochemistry, antibody binding was detected with an avidinbiotin complex (ABC Elite kits; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California) and a color reaction product developed following addition of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; DAKO, Kingsgrove, Australia). These sections were counterstained with hematoxylin prior to mounting with DPX Mountant. For immunofluorescence double staining, Alexa Fluor antibodies (Alexa 488 or 546 Goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 488 or 546 rabbit anti-mouse, Alexa 546 goat anti-rat; Molecular Probes Inc, Eugene, Oregon) were used at a 1:300 dilution in TBS. The lectin of Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) was supplied conjugated with either fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or with biotin (Table 3). Sections were counterstained with the DNA fluorescent stain, DAPI, in mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). After photography of the fluorescent staining, sections in some slides were washed in DPBS, then the biotin-ABC staining procedure was repeated, starting from the secondary antibody incubation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Summary of antibodies used
 

For mouse recipient testes exhibiting donor bovine cell colonization, the proportion of tubules with bovine Sertoli cells or spermatogonia was determined by counting 4–10 testis sections situated 600–900 µm apart within each recipient mouse testis.


   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Protein Detection Using Cell-Specific Antibodies in Bull and Mouse Testes

A range of antibodies (Table 3) was used for detecting proteins present in different cell types of bovine and mouse testes under identical experimental conditions. Protein expression patterns in developing and adult bovine testes were compared to those in adult mouse testes, as this combination of tissues contained the cell types relevant to the subsequent analyses.

Binding of the bovine germ cell marker, DBA lectin, was detected in the cytoplasm of gonocytes and spermatogonia of bovine testes at all ages, but it was absent from all cells of mouse testes (Figure 1A through C). The protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) was readily observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of gonocytes and spermatogonia in bovine testes. In contrast, the PGP9.5 signal was relatively faint in cells along the inside of the basement membrane of the mouse seminiferous tubule epithelium (Figure 1D through F). Sertoli cells and spermatogonia exhibited weak positive staining for PGP9.5 (Figure 1F arrow and arrowhead). The presence of vasa-homolog protein (vasa) was evident in the cytoplasm of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids in both bull and mouse testes (Figure 1G through I). Germ cell nuclear antigen 1 (GCNA1) protein was detected in the nucleus of mouse, but not bovine, germ cells from spermatogonia to spermatids (data not shown; Zhang et al, 2006).


Figure 1
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Detection of cell-specific markers in bull and mouse testes. A–C: Lectin Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) binds the cytoplasm of bull spermatogonia (A, B) but does not bind any mouse cells (C). D–F: PGP9.5 is strongly detected in both the cytoplasm and nuclei of bull spermatogonia (D, E) but gives only a very faint signal in mouse cells along the inside of basement membrane, staining both Sertoli cells and spermatogonia (F). G–I: Vasa protein is detected in the cytoplasm of all germ cells in both bull (G, H) and mouse (I). J–L: Vimentin is detected in the perinuclear region of Sertoli cells in bull testes (J, K) but not detected in mouse Sertoli cells (L). M–O: WT1 is detected in the nucleus of Sertoli cells in all bull and mouse testes. P–R: NONO is only detected in the nucleus of mouse Sertoli cells (R), not in bull Sertoli cells (P, Q). Allphotos are at the same magnification, Scale bar = 100 µm. Inserts in A, D, G, J, M, and P are magnified 3-fold from an area marked with a square. Insert in (F) is an immature bovine testis section and shows negative control for antibody detection, with same magnification to (F). Arrowheads indicate spermatogonia; arrows, Sertoli cells; asterisks, Sertoli cell cytoplasm in immature testes; PS, primary spermatocytes; RS, round spermatids.

 

The Sertoli cell markers, WT1 and Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance (MIS), were detected in the Sertoli cell nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively, in both bull and mouse testes (Figure 1M through O for WT1 in bull and mouse; Figure 2B, D for MIS in bull only). Vimentin was also detected in the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells in bull but not mouse testes (Figure 1J through L). The newly reported Sertoli cell marker, NONO (Kuwahara et al, 2006), was only detected in the nucleus of mouse Sertoli cells, with no reactivity to this antibody observed in bull Sertoli cells (Figure 1P through R).


Figure 2
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Differential protein detection by double staining of antibodies in immature bull testes. A–D: Vimentin (VIM) and Mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS) display the same cellular localization pattern (merged in D) in the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells, and vimentin staining shows a clearer background. E–H: WT1 is detected in the nucleus (F), and vimentin is detected in the cytoplasm (E) of Sertoli cells, yielding separate signals as evident when merged together (H). I–L: NONO was not detected in bull Sertoli cells (I), and WT1 is consistently detected in the nuclei of these Sertoli cells (J). M–P: The lectin Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) is detected in the cytoplasm (M) and PGP9.5 in nuclei (N) of spermatogonia; when merged together, their cellular expression overlap is easily seen (P). Q–T: The lectin DBA (Q) and vasa (R) protein are detected in the cytoplasm of spermatogonia respectively, and when merged, all the DBA-positive cells express vasa protein with cytoplasm overlap; however, some vasa-positive cells were not detected with DBA (T, arrows). C, G, K, O, and S are stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 100 µm.

 
The simultaneous detection of species- and cell-specific markers was performed in immature bovine testes using immunofluorescence. Vimentin and MIS proteins colocalized in Sertoli cells, yielding a yellow fluorescent signal when their images were merged (Figure 2A through D). In contrast, there was no overlap between the red nuclear WT1 protein signal and the green cytoplasmic vimentin signal in Sertoli cells (Figure 2E through H). Because NONO was not detectable in bovine Sertoli cells, the merged image of NONO and WT1 staining only showed the WT1 protein in these cells (Figure 2I through L). The signals for DBA (green) and PGP9.5 (red) in germ cells appeared to overlap in most cells (Figure 2M through P). When the images of DBA lectin were merged with those of vasa, all DBA-positive cells overlapped with the vasa-positive cells, but not all vasa-positive cells overlapped with the DBA-positive cells (Figure 2Q through T), indicating some vasa-positive bull germ cells were not detected with DBA lectin.

The {alpha}-actin smooth muscle ({alpha}SMA) protein was detected in smooth muscle cells of blood vessels and in peritubular myoid cells in the testes of both bull (Figure 3B and J) and mouse (not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Immature bull testicular tissue or testis aggregated cells grafted in nude mice. (A) Nude mouse containing bull testis tissue grafted and grown under the back skin for 2.5 mo. B–D: Immunohistology shows the grafted bull testis tissue maintains an intact tubular structure with morphologically normal peritubular myoid cells (B, {alpha}SMA staining), spermatogonia (C, vasa staining) and Sertoli cells (D, vimentin staining). Freshly collected bull testicular cells loaded in a drop of medium for 3 hr appear as single cells (E); after 3 d in culture they form an aggregate (F). Immunofluorescence results from the cell-aggregates in day 5 culture show vasa- (G) and vimentin- (H) positive cells present. (I) Exposed bull testicular cell-aggregates grafted and grown under the back skin of a nude mouse for 2 mo. J–L, Immunohistochemistry results from serial sections show that a tubular structure has formed in the aggregate with peritubular myoid cells (J, {alpha}SMA staining) and Sertoli cells (L, vimentin staining), but without germ cells present (K, no vasa-positive cells). M–P: Serial sections from a mouse testis that had been implanted with bull testis cell aggregates under the tunica albuginea for 2 mo. A small proportion of tubules (*) contain the Sertoli cells stained with vimentin positive (M), but with NONO negative (N). In contrast, those tubules lacking vimentin staining display positive staining of NONO protein (N). No germ cells are present in the 2 tubules (*) as indicated by the lack of staining with both anti-GCNA1 and anti-vasa antibodies; germ cells are present in the adjacent tubules and are stained by both anti-GCNA1 and anti-vasa antibodies (O, P). Thus, the 2 tubules (*) are considered as originating from bovine cells. Arrows point to the tunica albuginea of the host mouse testis. White bar = 50 µm for G, H; black bar = 5 mm in I and = 100 µm in B–D and J–P.

 
Bovine Testicular Tissues and Aggregated Cells Grafted Into Mouse

Fresh and cultured (3–5 days) testicular tissue fragments from 5 of the 8 prepubertal bovine donors were grafted under the dorsal skin of 4 nude mice (Table 2). With grafted tissues, no obvious nodes were detected in the surgical implant areas. When these grafted tissues were removed and assessed 2.5–3 months after surgery, increased size of the grafted tissues can be seen clearly in the implanted areas (Figure 3A), indicating their survival and growth in the mouse during this interval. By histology, the preserved tubular structure of the grafted tissues was evident (Figure 3B through D). Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells looked morphologically normal, and both vimentin and {alpha}SMA were readily detected (Figure 3B and D) in all grafted tissues. Only 2 of 5 bovine tissue grafts contained tubules with a few single or paired germ cells stained positively by the anti-vasa antibody, with germ cells present in 15.6% and 23% of tubules in these grafts (Figure 3C). We noted that those bovine grafts with germ cells present were only those grafted onto mice that had been castrated; bovine tissues grafted onto intact mice contained no detectable germ cells (Table 2). However, there was no indication that these surviving bovine germ cells differentiated during the 2–3 months after the graft was implanted, as judged by their location, the number of cells residing together (single or paired), and the ratio of cytoplasm to nucleus in these cells (Figure 3C; Russell et al, 1990). The culture period of 5 days prior to grafting did not prevent the survival of germ cells within the graft for the duration of the subsequent experiment.

We also cultured testicular cells derived from 3 of these 5 testes in hanging drops for 3–7 days (Table 2). When observed 3 hours after initial drop formation, the bovine cells remained as single cells (Figure 3E); however, when assessed 3 days later, these cells had formed aggregates (Figure 3F). Following 5 days of culture, both germ and Sertoli cells were present in the aggregates, as demonstrated by anti-vasa and anti-vimentin staining (Figure 3G and H). These aggregates at culture day 3 were grafted into 2 testes of a single mouse and under the dorsal skin of 3 nude mice. When they were removed 2–3 months later, the aggregated cell grafts implanted under the skin had disappeared in 1 mouse. The surviving cell aggregates placed under the skin at each site appeared to form 1 tissue mass per site (Figure 3I). Viewed using immunohistology, these tissue masses contained tubular structures exhibiting the normal arrangement of both Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells, as revealed by staining with anti-{alpha}SMA and anti-vimentin antibodies in all grafts (Figure 3J and L). However, no germ cells or cells stained by anti-vasa antibody were found in any of the grafts (Figure 3K). The aggregates implanted inside the testis survived and formed tubular structures, but they did not grow as large as the grafts placed subcutaneously in the back. Using mouse or bovine cell-specific antibodies, we identified Sertoli cells in 1 or 2 tubules very close to the tunica albuginea that stained positive with the anti-vimentin antibody (Figure 3M) but negative using the anti-NONO antibody (Figure 3N), indicating that these tubules had formed from bovine cells. In contrast, Sertoli cells in the adjacent tubules did not stain with the anti-vimentin antibody but were recognized by the anti-NONO antibody, indicating they were of mouse origin (Figure 3M and N). No germ cells were found within the bovine tubules, while many mouse germ cells at different stages of maturation were present in the mouse tubules, as demonstrated by anti-vasa and anti-GCNA1 antibody staining respectively (Figure 3O and P).

Bovine Testicular Cells Transplanted Into Mouse Testes

Freshly collected bovine testicular cells from 2 prepubertal animals were injected into 5 testes of nude mice that had been treated with busulfan 4–5 weeks previously. The majority of the injected bovine testicular cells were Sertoli cells (80% and 90% vimentin-positive cells from each preparation) and about 10% were germ cells (8% and 12% vasa-positive; Table 1). The recipient mice were killed and testes removed 2 months after transplantation. Using serial sections and double-staining with different antibody combinations, some Sertoli cells stained positive for vimentin in a few tubules (Figure 4A, C, E, and H), and these vimentin-positive cells were not stained by the anti-NONO antibody (Figure 4B, F, G, and H). However, all Sertoli cells, whether vimentin- or NONO-positive, were stained by the anti-WT1 antibody (Figure 4C, G, and H). These results demonstrate that bovine Sertoli cells survive in mouse testes following transplantation and form epithelial structures within the seminiferous tubules. We also noted that those tubules having some Sertoli cells recognized by the anti-vimentin antibody always also have a small proportion of vimentin-negative and NONO-positive Sertoli cells (Figure 4C, G, and H), indicating that both mouse and bovine Sertoli cells can reside adjacent to each other within the tubular epithelium. However, only rarely were bovine germ cells that reacted positively to the lectin DBA present within the mouse tubules that also contained bovine Sertoli cells (Figure 4A, B, F, and I). When double-staining of DBA and vasa was performed in the serial sections, a DBA-positive cell was also vasa-positive (Figure 4D), but most germ cells in adjacent tubules, presumably endogenous mouse germ cells, were not stained by DBA. However, all germ cells were stained by anti-mvh antibody (Figure 4E, F, and N). None of those bovine donor germ cells appeared to have differentiated based on the morphology of their chromatin. We stained both new serial sections and also those sections previously examined by immunofluorescence using the biotin-ABC immunohistochemistry procedure. The results were identical to those obtained when fluorescent staining alone was used: Some Sertoli cells stained positive with the anti-vimentin antibody (Figure 4K and O) and negative with the anti-NONO antibody (Figure 4J), yet all Sertoli cells were recognized by the WT1 antibody (Figure 4L and P). While only some germ cells were recognized by the lectin DBA (Figure 4I and M), all germ cells were stained by the anti-vasa antibody (Figure 4N). A pair of adjacent donor germ cells stained by DBA was occasionally found in these sections (Figure 4M).


Figure 4
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Mouse testes with bull testicular cells transplanted for 2 mo. A–D: Serial sections stained to identify bovine Sertoli cells (vimentin, red) and bovine germ cells (Dolichos biflorus agglutinin [DBA], green) in (A); Mouse Sertoli cells (NONO, red) and bovine germ cells (DBA, green) in (B); Vimentin (green) and WT1 (red) in (C); DBA green cells overlap vasa red cells in (D). Vimentin-positive and NONO-negative bovine Sertoli cells occupy most or half of the central tubule (+). In contrast, vimentin-negative and NONO-positive mouse Sertoli cells are present in adjacent tubules (*). All Sertoli cells display WT1. Two single DBA-positive bovine cells (arrows) are located in the tubules with vimentin-positive Sertoli cells (A, B). A single DBA-positive bovine cell (arrow) in the central tubule expresses vasa protein; the vasa-positive germ cells in adjacent tubules are not stained with the lectin DBA (D). E–L: Four serial sections stained by double antibody fluorescence first (E–H), then restained by either the double antibody or by lectin DBA (I–L). Sertoli cells show green cyptoplasmic staining with vimentin only (+; E, H); the few Sertoli cells stained with anti-NONO (*, +) are green in nuclei (F). When merged with WT1 (red) and DAPI (blue) staining, nuclei in some Sertoli cells show light yellow (G, H), indicating these are endogenous mouse Sertoli cells; nuclei in some Sertoli cells reveal red or pink (G, H), and their cytoplasmic are green (H), indicating they are bovine Sertoli cells. Germ cells are stained red with anti-vasa (*; E, F). Vasa-positive cells (arrow in tubule +; F) then stained DBA-positive in I (arrows). Sertoli cells stained with vimentin (K), NONO (J), and WT1 (L) are respectively related to E (vimentin), G (NONO and WT1), and H (vimentin, NONO, and WT1). M–O: Serial sections stained with DBA (M), mvh (N), and vimentin (O). Tubules marked + indicate bull donor cell colonization. (P) summarizes the species specific markers used in this study. Bov indicates bovine; Mou, mouse. Anti-GCNA1 antibody was not used in Figure 4 but was used in Figure 3. All blue signals in A–H indicate staining with DAPI. Scale bar = 100 µm.

 
We counted the tubules having bull Sertoli cells or spermatogonial colonization in 4–10 sections separated by 600–900 µm in each recipient mouse testis, recording an average of 6.3% host tubules harboring bull Sertoli cells and 1.0% of host tubules with bull spermatogonia (Table 1).


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
An essential requirement for successful application of the germ cell transplantation technique to bovine or other nonrodent species is to identify markers that can reliably distinguish donor from host cells. Unlike rodents, there are few lines of transgenic livestock with convenient reporter markers such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) or LacZ. Therefore, we have identified a set of reagents that recognizes specific subsets of both donor cells and host cells when used under the same experimental conditions. Although bovine spermatogonial cell colonization and survival in mouse testes after transplantation have been reported previously (Dobrinski et al, 2000; Izadyar et al, 2002b; Oatley et al, 2002), the colonization of the bovine Sertoli cells in mouse testis has not been demonstrated morphologically. Our findings clearly demonstrate that both bovine spermatogonia and Sertoli cells are able to colonize and survive within the mouse seminiferous epithelium for several months. The bovine Sertoli cell colonization in mouse testis may provide the correct niche for bovine donor spermatogonia within a foreign host, however differentiated bovine spermatogonia have not been found in the mouse hosts 2 months after transplantation.

The antibody that recognizes PGP9.5 (PGP9.5 is also named ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L through 1 [UCH-L1]; Wrobel et al, 1996; Kon et al, 1999), has previously been used as a gonocyte and spermatogonial marker for bull-to-mouse testicular cell transplantation (Oatley et al, 2004b). In our studies, this protein was detected with a strong signal in spermatogonia in bovine testes but yielded only a faint signal with mouse cells along the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules. Both Sertoli cells and spermatogonia in mouse testes exhibited this weak signal. Our results are consistent with previous studies in bull and mouse testes (Wrobel et al, 1996; Kon et al, 1999). Despite these differences, we did not assess donor cell colonization based on anti-PGP9.5 antibody staining because DBA provided a more reliable way to distinguish between germ cells of these species.

DBA has been used as a marker for prespermatogonia, the precursors of bovine spermatogonia present until the onset of spermatogenesis at week 30 of age (Ertl and Wrobel, 1992). Due to the lack of its binding to mouse germ cells, it has been used as a marker of bull donor germ cells in mouse testes after transplantation (Izadyar et al, 2002a). In our study, all DBA-stained cells showed overlap with some, but not all, of the vasa-stained cells in bovine testis. It can be explained because the vasa protein was detected in both undifferentiated and differentiated germ cells, whereas the DBA-positive cells are only the undifferentiated spermatogonia. Our bovine testicular cell transplantation results revealed that very few bovine germ cells colonized and survived in mouse testes after transplantation, with only 1% of tubules having single or paired bull spermatogonia, similar to previous reports (Dobrinski et al, 2000; Izadyar et al, 2002b; Oatley et al, 2002). The bull donor germ cells reactive to DBA were always found as single or occasionally paired cells within mouse testes, and they do not appear to be differentiated based on morphological criteria including chromatin configuration, position within the epithelium, and number of syncitial cells (de Rooij and Russell, 2000). Although they were stained positive by anti-vasa antibody, no progeny cells were evident.

Interspecific male testicular cell transplantation into mouse testes with donor cells from nonrodent species performed previously (Dobrinski et al, 2000; Nagano et al, 2001; Izadyar et al, 2002b; Oatley et al, 2002) has consistently shown that spermatogonial stem cells from nonrodent species colonize and survive but do not differentiate in the mouse seminiferous epithelium. However, these studies did not examine whether donor Sertoli cells were present in mouse testes and whether the donor Sertoli cells would support donor germ cell differentiation. In mouse-to-mouse spermatogonial transplantation, injection of donor cells with or without additional mitotic Sertoli cells did not enhance the ability of the donor spermatogenic cells to colonize the recipient mouse testis (Brinster and Avarbock, 1994). A key finding from the present study is that almost all bovine spermatogonia were embedded within bovine Sertoli cells (Figure 3A, I, K, M, and O), suggesting this may be favorable or required for foreign germ cell survival. However, these germ cells did not differentiate during the 2-month period. This may indicate that either bovine Sertoli cells in mouse testis are not fully functional, or that possibly some factors produced by the mouse testis cannot support bovine Sertoli or germ cell function or both. Another possibility is that the mouse testis actively produces substances that inhibit the development of foreign Sertoli cells and/or the differentiation of foreign germ cells.

Vimentin is an intermediate filament protein in Sertoli cells, and its synthesis is regulated by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; DePhilip and Kierszenbaum, 1982; Sasaki et al, 1998) and androgen (Wang et al, 2006). The Non-POU-domain-containing, octamer binding protein (NONO) forms a complex with the androgen receptor and functions as a coactivator for the receptor (Kuwahara et al, 2006). Testosterone regulates spermatogenesis via the androgen receptor present in Sertoli cells and by Sertoli cell products that influence developing germ cells (De Gendt et al, 2004; Hill et al, 2004). Although bull and mouse Sertoli cells can coexist within recipient mouse seminiferous tubules, whether the bull Sertoli cells function as they would in their native testis remains unknown; however, clearly they continue to produce a range of proteins that can be recognized by appropriate antisera. This raises the possibility that successful xenotransplantation may also require investigation of peritubular or Leydig cell-derived factors for driving spermatogenic differentiation. Yoshida et al (2007) demonstrated recently that reconstitution of stem cell niches for transplanted spermatogonial stem cells would involve the vascular network accompanying Leydig and other interstitial cells. This possibly explains that even under the presence of bovine Sertoli cells in mouse host testis, the bovine spermatogonia stem cells would not differentiate after transplantation because the newly formed stem cell niches may not be integrated or may be composed of mouse interstitial cells that are functionally species-specific.

In this study, testis fragments from 5 different animals were cultured for 0–5 days before grafting. Germ cells are typically maintained during such short-term culture (Figure 3G; Oatley et al, 2004b). However, only a few tubules in the fragment grafts contained single or paired spermatogonia (average 7.7%; Table 2) 2 months after grafting with no germ cell differentiation evident. The 2-month period following grafting might be too short to observe spermatogonial differentiation in the grafted fragment (Rathi et al, 2005), so a longer time course study is underway. Even though greater success was achieved after castration of the host, it is unlikely that testosterone is a key factor affecting germ cell survival and differentiation, given its nonspecific nature. It is also possible that other factors produced by the testis may have an effect. However, because only 2 host mice had been castrated, these data are viewed as preliminary. Previous results (Oatley et al, 2004a; Oatley et al, 2005) revealed that germ cells were able to differentiate in bull testis tissues xenografted in castrated mice whose circulating testosterone levels had been maintained by the grafted bull testis tissue for 4 weeks. This indicates that the prevailing endocrine environment could either directly or indirectly affect donor-derived spermatogenesis (Rathi et al, 2005). The ages of our bovine donors were estimated at around 2–4 months based on our previous publication (Herrid et al, 2007) and are similar to those used in another study (Oatley et al, 2005).

Immature Sertoli cells are known to form cords or tubular structures in extratesticular sites following culture (Gassei et al, 2006) or following ectopic grafting to the kidney (Dufour et al, 2002), brain (Sanberg et al, 1996), or under the skin (Honaramooz et al, 2007). Because of the immunosuppressive features of Sertoli cells, they can survive long-term in allografts and xenografts in wild type and immunodefective recipients (Hemendinger et al, 2002; Dufour et al, 2003). In our study, cultured testicular cells aggregated within hanging drops in 3 days. Sertoli cells and germ cells were present in the aggregates at least for 5 days. However, no germ cells were found 2 months after grafting. Previous reports showed that porcine spermatogonia survive as long as 25 weeks in the cell pellets grafted under the back skin of castrated nude or SCID mice (Honaramooz et al, 2007). These suggest that the mouse systemic environment does not support bull germ cell survival and development.

In summary, we have characterized a range of reagents that identify various types of testicular cells, providing tools to distinguish bull spermatogonia and Sertoli cells from mouse cells and to document bovine germ cell and somatic cell colonization and survival in mouse testes after transplantation. This study provides a firm basis for studies designed to define the critical barriers to, and drivers of, successful xenotransplantation of spermatogonia across all species.


   Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge Keryn Hutton and Dr David Galloway for supplying bovine testes, Dr Fang X Jiang for kindly supplying the anti-vimentin antibody used in this study, and Dr G Enders for anti-GCNA1 antibody. We thank Dr Julia Young, Penny Whiley, and Laura Tubino for their technical help.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by awards to from the Food Futures CSIRO National Research Flagship (Z.Z. and J.H.), the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development (348293, M.H. and K.L.), and a Grant-in Aid from the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology of Japan (Y.K.).


   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Brinster RL. Male germline stem cells: from mice to men. Science. 2007;316: 404 –405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91: 11303 –11307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 11298 –11302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Gendt K, Swinnen JV, Saunders PT, Schoonjans L, Dewerchin M, Devos A, Tan K, Atanassova N, Claessens F, Lecureuil C, Heyns W, Carmeliet P, Guillou F, Sharpe RM, Verhoeven G. A Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101: 1327 –1332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Rooij DG, Russell LD. All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl. 2000; 21: 776 –798.[Medline]

DePhilip RM, Kierszenbaum AL. Hormonal regulation of protein synthesis, secretion, and phosphorylation in cultured rat Sertoli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79: 6551 –6555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Germ cell transplantation from large domestic animals into mouse testes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;57: 270 –279.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dobrinski I, Travis AJ. Germ cell transplantation for the propagation of companion animals, non-domestic and endangered species. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007; 19: 732 –739.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dufour JM, Rajotte RV, Korbutt GS. Development of an in vivo model to study testicular morphogenesis. J Androl. 2002; 23: 635 –644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dufour JM, Rajotte RV, Seeberger K, Kin T, Korbutt GS. Long-term survival of neonatal porcine Sertoli cells in non-immunosuppressed rats. Xenotransplantation. 2003; 10: 577 –586.[CrossRef][Medline]

Enders GC, May JJ II. Developmentally regulated expression of a mouse germ cell nuclear antigen examined from embryonic day 11 to adult in male and female mice. Dev Biol. 1994; 163: 331 –340.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ertl C, Wrobel KH. Distribution of sugar residues in the bovine testis during postnatal ontogenesis demonstrated with lectin-horseradish peroxidase conjugates. Histochemistry. 1992; 97: 161 –171.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gassei K, Schlatt S, Ehmcke J. De novo morphogenesis of seminiferous tubules from dissociated immature rat testicular cells in xenografts. J Androl. 2006; 27: 611 –618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goel S, Sugimoto M, Minami N, Yamada M, Kume S, Imai H. Identification, isolation, and in vitro culture of porcine gonocytes. Biol Reprod. 2007; 77: 127 –137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hemendinger RA, Gores P, Blacksten L, Harley V, Halberstadt C. Identification of a specific Sertoli cell marker, Sox9, for use in transplantation. Cell Transplant. 2002; 11: 499 –505.[Medline]

Herrid M, Davey RJ, Hill JR. Characterization of germ cells from prepubertal bull calves in preparation for germ cell transplantation. Cell Tissue Res. 2007; 330(2): 321 –329.[CrossRef][Medline]

Herrid M, Vignarajan S, Davey R, Dobrinski I, Hill JR. Successful transplantation of bovine testicular cells to heterologous recipients. Reproduction. 2006; 132: 617 –624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hill CM, Anway MD, Zirkin BR, Brown TR. Intratesticular androgen levels, androgen receptor localization, and androgen receptor expression in adult rat Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71: 1348 –1358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hill JR, Dobrinski I. Male germ cell transplantation in livestock. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006; 18: 13 –18.[Medline]

Honaramooz A, Behboodi E, Megee SO, Overton SA, Galantino-Homer H, Echelard Y, Dobrinski I. Fertility and germline transmission of donor haplotype following germ cell transplantation in immunocompetent goats. Biol Reprod. 2003; 69: 1260 –1264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Dobrinski I. Germ cell transplantation in pigs. Biol Reprod. 2002; 66: 21 –28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Rathi R, Dobrinski I. Building a testis: formation of functional testis tissue after transplantation of isolated porcine (Sus scrofa) testis cells. Biol Reprod. 2007; 76: 43 –47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Izadyar F, Den Ouden K, Creemers LB, Posthuma G, Parvinen M, De Rooij DG. Proliferation and differentiation of bovine type A spermatogonia during long-term culture. Biol Reprod. 2003; 68: 272 –281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Izadyar F, Matthijs-Rijsenbilt JJ, den Ouden K, Creemers LB, Woelders H, de Rooij DG. Development of a cryopreservation protocol for type A spermatogonia. J Androl. 2002a; 23: 537 –545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Izadyar F, Spierenberg GT, Creemers LB, Den Ouden K, De Rooij DG. Isolation and purification of type A spermatogonia from the bovine testis. Reproduction. 2002b; 124: 85 –94.[Abstract]

Kon Y, Endoh D, Iwanaga T. Expression of protein gene product 9.5, a neuronal ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase, and its developing change in sertoli cells of mouse testis. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999; 54: 333 –341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuwahara S, Ikei A, Taguchi Y, Tabuchi Y, Fujimoto N, Obinata M, Uesugi S, Kurihara Y. PSPC1, NONO, and SFPQ are expressed in mouse Sertoli cells and may function as coregulators of androgen receptor-mediated transcription. Biol Reprod. 2006; 75 : 352–359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nagano M, McCarrey JR, Brinster RL. Primate spermatogonial stem cells colonize mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 2001; 64: 1409 –1416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nakanishi T, Ikawa M, Yamada S, Parvinen M, Baba T, Nishimune Y, Okabe M. Real-time observation of acrosomal dispersal from mouse sperm using GFP as a marker protein. FEBS Lett. 1999; 449: 277 –283.[CrossRef][Medline]

Oatley JM, de Avila DM, McLean DJ, Griswold MD, Reeves JJ. Transplantation of bovine germinal cells into mouse testes. J Anim Sci. 2002;80: 1925 –1931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oatley JM, de Avila DM, Reeves JJ, McLean DJ. Spermatogenesis and germ cell transgene expression in xenografted bovine testicular tissue. Biol Reprod. 2004a; 71: 494 –501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oatley JM, de Avila DM, Reeves JJ, McLean DJ. Testis tissue explant culture supports survival and proliferation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2004b; 70: 625 –631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oatley JM, Reeves JJ, McLean DJ. Establishment of spermatogenesis in neonatal bovine testicular tissue following ectopic xenografting varies with donor age. Biol Reprod. 2005; 72: 358 –364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of male germ line stem cells restores fertility in infertile mice. Nat Med. 2000;6: 29 –34.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ohta H, Yomogida K, Dohmae K, Nishimune Y. Regulation of proliferation and differentiation in spermatogonial stem cells: the role of c-kit and its ligand SCF. Development. 2000; 127: 2125 –2131.[Abstract]

Radford J, Shalet S, Lieberman B. Fertility after treatment for cancer. Questions remain over ways of preserving ovarian and testicular tissue. BMJ. 1999; 319: 935 –936.[Free Full Text]

Rathi R, Honaramooz A, Zeng W, Schlatt S, Dobrinski I. Germ cell fate and seminiferous tubule development in bovine testis xenografts. Reproduction. 2005; 130: 923 –929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Russell L, Ettlin R, SinhaHikim A, Clegg E. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990; 1 –58.

Sanberg PR, Borlongan CV, Saporta S, Cameron DF. Testis-derived Sertoli cells survive and provide localized immunoprotection for xenografts in rat brain. Nat Biotechnol. 1996; 14: 1692 –1695.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sasaki M, Yamamoto M, Arishima K, Eguchi Y. Effects of follicle-stimulating hormone on intermediate filaments and cell division of Sertoli cells of fetal rat testis in culture. J Vet Med Sci. 1998; 60: 35 –39.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tan SS. Liver-specific and position-effect expression of a retinol-binding protein-lacZ fusion gene (RBP-lacZ) in transgenic mice. Dev Biol. 1991; 146: 24 –37.[CrossRef][Medline]

van den Berg H, Repping S, van der Veen F. Parental desire and acceptability of spermatogonial stem cell cryopreservation in boys with cancer. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 594 –597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang RS, Yeh S, Chen LM, Lin HY, Zhang C, Ni J, Wu CC, di Sant'Agnese PA, deMesy-Bentley KL, Tzeng CR, Chang C. Androgen receptor in sertoli cell is essential for germ cell nursery and junctional complex formation in mouse testes. Endocrinology. 2006; 147: 5624 –5633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wrobel KH, Bickel D, Kujat R. Immunohistochemical study of seminiferous epithelium in adult bovine testis using monoclonal antibodies against Ki-67 protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Cell Tissue Res. 1996; 283: 191 –201.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yoshida S, Sukeno M, Nabeshima Y. A vasculature-associated niche for undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse testis. Science. 2007;317: 1722 –1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang Z, Renfree MB, Short RV. Successful intra- and interspecific male germ cell transplantation in the rat. Biol Reprod. 2003;68: 961 –967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang Z, Shao S, Meistrich ML. Irradiated mouse testes efficiently support spermatogenesis derived from donor germ cells of mice and rats. J Androl. 2006;27: 365 –375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang Z, Shao S, Meistrich ML. The radiation-induced block in spermatogonial differentiation is due to damage to the somatic environment, not the germ cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 211: 149 –158.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. R Rodriguez-Sosa and I. Dobrinski
Recent developments in testis tissue xenografting
Reproduction, August 1, 2009; 138(2): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Z. Zhang, S. Shao, G. Shetty, and M. L Meistrich
Donor Sertoli cells transplanted into irradiated rat testes stimulate partial recovery of endogenous spermatogenesis
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 497 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. M Aponte, T. Soda, K. J Teerds, S C. Mizrak, H. J G van de Kant, and D. G de Rooij
Propagation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells in vitro
Reproduction, November 1, 2008; 136(5): 543 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/4/418    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS