| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,

,¶
From the * Department of Urology, St Marianna
University School of Medicine, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Japan;
Core Research for Evolution Science and
Technology, Japan Science and Technology Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan;
Biomedical Engineering Center, Toin University
of Yokohama, Aobaku, Yokohama, Japan;
Institute
of Advanced Medical Science, St Marianna University School of Medicine,
Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Japan; and || Department of
Clinical Proteomics, St Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine,
Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Japan.
| Correspondence to: Dr Katsunori Yamakawa, Department of Urology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan (e-mail: katsu-26{at}marianna-u.ac.jp) |
| Received for publication March 10, 2007; accepted for publication May 29, 2007. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Male infertility, two-dimensional (2-D) difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE), nonobstructive, obstructive
The evaluation of azoospermia patients should be geared toward determining whether azoospermia is caused by lack of spermatogenesis or by seminal tract obstruction. The first step in the diagnosis of azoospermia is frequently semen analysis. The final step is to centrifuge the semen specimen and check for the absence of sperm. The presence of any sperm in the pellet rules out complete bilateral seminal tract obstruction. NOA patients generally have a small testicular volume and FSH serum levels 2 to 3 times higher than normal (Sigman and Jarow, 2002). For further examination, a conventional testicular biopsy should be performed for diagnosis. Prior to the advent of assisted reproductive technology (ART), patients diagnosed with NOA could not produce offspring. However, ART makes it possible for NOA patients to become fathers. Sperm can be retrieved in some NOA patients by multiple testicular sperm extractions (TESE). Therefore, a specific biochemical marker that predicts the presence of sperm is important and necessary when performing multiple TESE. For this purpose, we have been searching for a suitable marker that would serve as a useful predictor in TESE for NOA patients. Serum and seminal inhibin-B levels, FSH levels, and testicular volume have been discussed previously as potential markers (Ballesca et al, 2000). However, these are not sufficiently reliable to be regarded as specific markers. This leads us to identify the cause of spermatogenic disturbance as well as a sperm retrieval predictor in the seminal plasma protein.
The range of protein concentrations in seminal plasma averages between 35 and 55 mg/mL, making it a rich and easily accessible source for protein identification. In recent years two-dimensional (2-D) gel studies have been combined with mass spectrometric (MS) identification of protein spots that change abundantly in different clinical stages related to infertility (Starita-Geribaldi et al, 2001, 2003). A study using 2-D and 1-D gel electrophoresis and both matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight MS and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) reported the identification of 61 different proteins (Fung et al, 2004). In a recent study employing 1-D gel electrophoresis and high-confidence identification, 923 proteins were identified in the seminal plasma derived from a single individual (Pilch and Mann, 2006). However, there is no study focusing on intraindividual and interindividual variations that is comparable to other proteomic studies, including those on cerebrospinal fluid (Hu et al, 2005) and liver (Zhang et al, 2006). To identify disease-related markers, it is important to examine the diversity of individual samples. For this purpose, we applied a proteomic approach based on 2-D difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) to select a normalized standard map of normal seminal plasma proteins from fertile men. We then used this standard map to identify the differences in the expression of polypeptides between fertile men and azoospermia patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Apparatus![]()
Separation in the first dimension of 2-D gel electrophoresis was carried
out on an Ettan IPGphor isoelectric focusing unit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Uppsala, Sweden). The wet gels were scanned and subsequently processed by the
software ImageMaster (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The mass spectra of the
tryptic digests were acquired by nanoscale capillary LC-MS/MS analysis on a
capillary LC system (MAGIC 2002; Michrom BioResources, Inc, Auburn, Calif)
connected to an in-line nanoelectrospray mass spectrometer (LCQ Advantage;
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Mass) equipped with a silica-coated glass
capillary (PicoTip; New Objective, Inc, Woburn, Mass).
Reagents![]()
Urea and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules,
Calif). Silicon oil fluid and immobilized pH gradient (IPG) 3–10 strips
were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)
dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), dithiothreitol (DTT), and
iodoacetamide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Mo).
Sequencing-grade modified porcine trypsin was obtained from Promega (Madison,
Wis), and bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagents were obtained from
Pierce (Rockford, Ill).
Sample Preparation![]()
A fraction of each sample was used for microscale protein determination
using the BCA assay (Smith et al,
1985). The samples were diluted in rehydration buffer containing 8
M urea, 2% CHAPS, 18 mM DTT, 0.5% IPG buffer, and 0.002% bromophenol blue.
Analytic separation was performed with 50 µg of seminal fluid proteins on
pH 3–10 IPG strips (70 mm in length). For semipreparative separations,
0.5 mg of each protein was separated on pH 3–10 IPG strips (130 mm in
length).
Isoelectric Focusing in Immobilized pH Gradients![]()
In routine analysis, the entire IPG gel was used for sample application,
during which the protein entered the gel during rehydration. The rehydration
volume was 125 µL of rehydration buffer for a gel with the following
characteristics: width, 3 mm; thickness, 0.5 mm; length, 70 mm; pH 3–10;
nonlinear. Isoelectric focusing was carried out using IPGphor at 20°C. For
analytic purposes, electrophoresis was performed with a voltage gradient of
8000 V to attain a total of 40 kVh for a pH 3–10 IPG strip.
SDS Gel Electrophoresis![]()
Prior to the resolution of the IPG gel by SDS gel electrophoresis using a
10% to 20% polyacrylamide gradient gel, it was equilibrated in a solution for
IPG containing 30% (wt/vol) glycerol, 6 M urea, 2% (wt/vol) SDS, and 0.002%
(wt/vol) bromophenol blue in 0.05 M Tris-HCl at pH 8.8. The first step of the
equilibration was carried out using 65 mM DTT. This was followed by a second
equilibration step that was carried out using 260 mM iodoacetamide. Both
equilibration steps were performed for 15 minutes at room temperature.
Detection of the 2-D Pattern![]()
Silver staining of the 2-D gels was performed using a silver staining kit
(Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan). Coomassie brilliant blue R detection was
considered a good quantitative indication for spot excision. The gels were
scanned, and volumetric determination of the detected spots was performed by
computer analysis. Seminal plasma possesses a feature common to many other
body fluids—a high dynamic range of protein abundance; this renders
analysis of low-abundance components difficult. Therefore, we applied 50 µg
of the protein sample per strip (70 mm in length), an amount excessive for
silver staining. The abundant proteins, namely transferrin, albumin, prostatic
acid phosphatase (PAP), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), were excluded
from this analysis. We then performed 2-D gel electrophoresis 3 times for each
sample. Matching was performed using the gel N1-1 as a reference gel. For each
sample, the spots that were present in at least 2 gels were considered as the
average gel spots.
In-Gel Protein Digestion![]()
The protein spots were excised from the gel. The gel pieces were then
washed in water, followed by destaining with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate
containing 50% methanol. The procedure was repeated until the gel was
completely destained. Finally, the pieces were homogenized, dried in a vacuum
centrifuge, and stored at –20°C until trypsin digestion. The dried
gel pieces were reswollen with a minimum amount of trypsin solution, depending
on the amount of protein (typically 20 µL of a 1 pmol trypsin/10 µL
solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.8). When necessary, further buffer was
added until the gel piece was completely rehydrated. The digestion was
performed for 10 hours at 37°C. The peptides were extracted with 50% to
80% acetonitrile, and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and the organic solvent
was evaporated in a vacuum centrifuge.
LC-MS/MS and Data Analysis![]()
The concentrated proteolytic peptide mixture was added to 35 µL of 2%
acetonitrile and 0.1% TFA and subjected to nanoscale capillary LC-MS/MS
analysis. The spectra were collected as MS and MS/MS scans. The MS scan
defined the ion composition at an m/z range of 450 to 2000,
and the MS/MS scan acquired the mass spectrum of the parental ion upon
collision-induced dissociation. The acquired collision-induced dissociation
spectra were analyzed by direct inspection using Bioworks Browser software
(Thermo Fisher Scientific). A list of peptide masses was obtained for each
protein digest. This peptide mass fingerprint was then submitted to the MASCOT
program (Matrix Science, Inc, Boston, Mass) for protein identification.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently the identification of proteins separated by 1-D gel
electrophoresis has been well documented for human seminal plasma
(Pilch and Mann, 2006). Pilch
and Mann (2006) examined the
seminal plasma preparation of a single individual, and proteolytic
liquefaction was suppressed by the use of a protease inhibitor. This
preparation is suitable for the documentation of proteins; however, the
seminal plasma samples were usually obtained in a liquefied and proteolyzed
form after the assessment of sperm parameters in infertility clinics.
Therefore, the present study used liquefied seminal plasma to discover
potential clinically available markers. Another study produced a 2-D gel
electrophoresis map of liquefied seminal plasma and compared it with
vasectomized and SCO syndrome samples
(Starita-Geribaldi et al,
2001). These authors also identified PAP and PSA in the seminal
plasma. However, they neither showed the interindividual variations nor
identified the potential markers. Some proteins that are abundantly present in
the serum, such as albumin, transferrin, lactoferrin, and
-1-antitrypsin, have also been characterized in seminal plasma
(Edwards et al, 1981); however,
their functions with respect to male infertility remain unclear. Many attempts
have been made to identify the constituents of seminal plasma; however, there
have been very few studies designed to identify disease-related markers in
seminal plasma, particularly those related to male infertility. Here, we
identified 4 candidate markers for NOA, namely stabilin 2 (STAB2), 135-kd
centrosomal protein (CP135), guanine nucleotide–releasing protein
(GNRP), and prolactin-inducible protein (PIP). Of these, STAB, CP135, and GNRP
have high molecular weights and exist as membrane or intracellular proteins.
There have been no reports on these proteins with respect to male infertility.
The origin of these proteins is expected to be the testis or epididymis;
however, further investigations are necessary to confirm these origins. PIP is
probably a secreted protein that is expressed in several exocrine tissues,
particularly those of the mammary gland
(Murphy et al, 1987) and
seminal vesicle (Autiero et al,
1997). Our result showed that the PIP spot was absent in all OA
patient samples, supporting the hypothesis that PIP is derived from the testis
or epididymis. The PIP spot was also absent in some NOA patients. This
suggests that the origin of PIP is not only the seminal vesicle but also the
testis or epididymis. It was reasonable to consider that the 2 spots for OA
markers were epididymal secretory protein E1 (Niemann-Pick disease C2 protein
[NPC2]). NPC2 is a major secretory protein of the epididymis
(Kirchhoff et al, 1996), and
its expression level is decreased after vasectomies
(Legare et al, 2006). This
expression level should be examined in a greater number of seminal plasma
samples from NOA and OA patients to determine its application as a clinical
marker in distinguishing NOA from OA.
In conclusion, the present study provides the first evidence for interindividual variations in the human seminal plasma proteome and demonstrates that 2-D gel electrophoresis is useful for the identification of clinically available markers for azoospermia. The present data have indicated several possible candidate markers for OA and NOA. Further investigations will be necessary to identify these markers, to employ them in clinical diagnosis, and to clarify the causes of male infertility.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
¶ Dr Teruaki Iwamoto is now with the Center for Infertility and IVF,
International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Autiero M, Bouchier C, Basmaciogullari S, Zaborski P, el Marhomy S, Martin M, Guardiola J, Piatier-Tonneau D. Isolation from a human seminal vesicle library of the cDNA for gp17, a CD4 binding factor. Immunogenetics. 1997; 46: 345 -348.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ballesca JL, Balasch J, Calafell JM, Alvarez R, Fabregues F, de
Osaba MJ, Ascaso C, Vanrell JA. Serum inhibin B determination is predictive of
successful testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1734
-1738.
Banez LL, Srivastava S, Moul JW. Proteomics in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2005; 15: 151 -156.[Medline]
Edwards JJ, Tollaksen SL, Anderson NG. Proteins of human semen. I.
Two-dimensional mapping of human seminal fluid. Clin
Chem. 1981;27: 1335
-1340.
Fung KY, Glode LM, Green S, Duncan MW. A comprehensive characterization of the peptide and protein constituents of human seminal fluid. Prostate. 2004; 61: 171 -181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hu Y, Malone JP, Fagan AM, Townsend RR, Holtzman DM. Comparative
proteomic analysis of intra- and interindividual variation in human
cerebrospinal fluid. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005; 4: 2000
-2009.
Kirchhoff C, Osterhoff C, Young L. Molecular cloning and characterization of HE1, a major secretory protein of the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1996; 54: 847 -856.[Abstract]
Legare C, Thabet M, Gatti JL, Sullivan R. HE1/NPC2 status in human
reproductive tract and ejaculated spermatozoa: consequence of vasectomy.
Mol Hum Reprod. 2006; 12: 461
-468.
Liberatori S, Bini L, De Felice C, Magi B, Marzocchi B, Raggiaschi R, Frutiger S, Sanchez JC, Wilkins MR, Hughes G, Hochstrasser DF, Bracci R, Pallini V. A two-dimensional protein map of human amniotic fluid at 17 weeks' gestation. Electrophoresis. 1997; 18: 2816 -2822.[CrossRef][Medline]
Molloy MP, Brzezinski EE, Hang J, McDowell MT, VanBogelen RA. Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2003; 3: 1912 -1919.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murphy LC, Tsuyuki D, Myal Y, Shiu RP. Isolation and sequencing of
a cDNA clone for a prolactin-inducible protein (PIP). Regulation of PIP gene
expression in the human breast cancer cell line, T-47D. J Biol
Chem. 1987;262: 15236
-15241.
Nishimune Y, Tanaka H. Infertility caused by polymorphisms or
mutations in spermatogenesis-specific genes. J Androl. 2006; 27: 326
-334.
Pilch B, Mann M. Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma. Genome Biol. 2006; 7: R40 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Sigman M, Jarow JP. Male infertility. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan AD, & Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology. New York, NY: WB Saunders Co; 2002: 1475 -1531.
Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985; 150: 76 -85.[CrossRef][Medline]
Starita-Geribaldi M, Poggioli S, Zucchini M, Garin J, Chevallier D,
Fenichel P, Pointis G. Mapping of seminal plasma proteins by two-dimensional
gel electrophoresis in men with normal and impaired spermatogenesis.
Mol Hum Reprod. 2001; 7: 715
-722.
Starita-Geribaldi M, Roux F, Garin J, Chevallier D, Fenichel P, Pointis G. Development of narrow immobilized pH gradients covering one pH unit for human seminal plasma proteomic analysis. Proteomics. 2003; 3: 1611 -1619.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tissot JD, Schneider P, James RW, Daigneault R, Hochstrasser DF. High-resolution two-dimensional protein electrophoresis of pathological plasma/serum. Appl Theor Electrophor. 1991; 2: 7 -12.[Medline]
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1992 .
Yun M, Wu W, Hood L, Harrington M. Human cerebrospinal fluid protein database: edition 1992. Electrophoresis. 1992; 13: 1002 -1013.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang X, Guo Y, Song Y, Sun W, Yu C, Zhao X, Wang H, Jiang H, Li Y, Qian X, Jiang Y, He F. Proteomic analysis of individual variation in normal livers of human beings using difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics. 2006; 6: 5260 -5268.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |