| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



From the * Department of Animal Biology, School of
Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
the
Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Reproductive Sciences and Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Pittsburgh
Development Center of Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and the
Department of Molecular Genetics and
Microbiology, Powell Gene Therapy Center and McKnight Brain Institute,
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| Correspondence to: Dr Ralph L. Brinster, Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3850 Baltimore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (e-mail: cpope{at}vet.upenn.edu). |
| Received for publication August 16, 2006; accepted for publication November 9, 2006. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: lentivirus, spermatogenesis, testis
Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation is an essential technique for achieving SSC-mediated transgenesis (Brinster and Avarbock, 1994; Brinster and Zimmermann, 1994). Donor testis cells containing SSCs can be collected and genetically modified in vitro and then transplanted into infertile recipient testes, where donor cellderived spermatogenesis will occur and produce spermatozoa that contain the genetic modification. These recipient animals can be mated to produce offspring carrying the modified donor genes. This approach has the potential to be more efficient and effective in generating transgenic rats and perhaps other animals than current methods. Insertion of a transgene into SSCs by lentiviral transduction assures germline transmission, and each recipient animal potentially can generate founder offspring, each with unique chromosomal integration sites.
The principle of generating transgenic animals through genetic modification of SSCs followed by transplantation has been applied in both mice (Nagano et al, 2000, 2001, 2002) and rats (Hamra et al, 2002; Orwig et al, 2002). We have previously demonstrated the insertion of a LacZ marker transgene into the genome of SSCs using retroviral vectors with both species (Nagano et al, 2000, 2001; Orwig et al, 2002). The Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) has been one of the most widely used vectors for genetic modification because of its ability to stably integrate proviral DNA into the genome (Miller, 1992; Verma and Somia, 1997). In mice, 2%20% of the SSCs could be transduced by an MMLV retroviral vector, resulting in production of transgenic offspring following transplantation at a frequency of 4.5% (Nagano et al, 2001). In rats, only 0.5% of SSCs exposed to the MMLV retroviral vector were transduced and produced transgenic colonies of spermatogenesis in recipient testes (Orwig et al, 2002). Because retroviruses require active cell division for insertion of proviral DNA into the host cell genome, these vectors pose a limitation in application because SSCs divide slowly (Meistrich et al, 1993; Kubota et al, 2004; Hamra et al, 2005; Ryu et al, 2005).
Lentiviruses, a subclass of retroviruses, are capable of transducing nondividing cells (Bukrinsky et al, 1993; Verma and Somia, 1997), and thus have greater potential as a vector for efficiently altering the genome of slowly dividing cells such as SSCs. The ability of lentiviral vectors to transduce mouse SSCs has been demonstrated by insertion of the LacZ marker transgene (Nagano et al, 2002). Similarly, rat SSCs have been transduced with an eGFP transgene using a lentiviral vector, in which transgenic offspring were produced after transplantation (Hamra et al, 2002). In these studies the efficiency of lentiviral transduction of SSCs was not fully examined. Thus, the usefulness of lentiviral vector transduction of SSCs compared to other means of generating transgenic animals remains unresolved, especially in the case of rats.
Laboratory rats are one of the most widely used animal models in biological sciences. With the abundant physiological and genomic information available, rats are an excellent model for studying gene function, and use of transgenesis to alter and control expression of specific genes would greatly expand their usefulness. However, development of methods for transgenesis, and eventually gene targeting, has been hindered because of specific characteristics of the rat model that differ in some respects from the well-established mouse system. Two significant problems are the difficulty in producing transgenic rats by egg pronuclear injection and the absence of embryonic stem cells to generate mutant rats. Thus, an impetus for attempting to use rat SSCs to produce transgenic animals is the possibility that the system would be more efficient than pronuclear injection and that it could be extended to generate targeted gene mutations. As a first step, this study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of using lentiviral vectors to stably transduce rat SSCs and efficiently generate transgenic progeny after transplantation. Because spermatogenesis is a well-conserved process in mammals (Fritz, 1986), techniques developed in rats for generation of transgenic animals through the male germline may be applicable to other species.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell suspensions were enriched for SSCs using flow cytometric cell sorting
(FACS) based on Thy1loß3-integrin staining
as previously described (Ryu et al,
2004). Sorting of cell populations was conducted using a
dual-laser FACStar Plus (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif) equipped with 488-nm
argon and 633-nm helium neon laser made available through the Cancer Center
Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Shared Resource at the University of
Pennsylvania. Cells were sorted into polypropylene tubes containing
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-S (PBS with 1% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM
pyruvate, 5.6 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES), pelleted by centrifugation at 600
x g for 7 minutes and resuspended in culture media (MEM
;
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif).
Lentiviral Transduction![]()
The lentiviral vector used (EF1-eGFP) consisted of the enhanced GFP gene
(eGFP) driven by the elongation factor 1 (EF1) promoter
(Chang et al, 1999). The vector
was produced by the University of Pennsylvania Vector Core. FACS-separated
Thy1loß3-integrin cells (7.535
x 104 cells/cm2) were cultured in MEM
medium with 4 µg/mL polybrene on mitotically inactivated SIM mouse
embryoderived thioguanine and ouabain resistant cell feeders seeded at
a concentration of 5 x 104 cells/cm2. Cells were
exposed to EF1-eGFP lentivirus for 15 hours at a multiplicity of infection
(MOI) of either 20 or 80 at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in
air. On the next day, the infected cells were recovered by trypsin-EDTA
digestion and washed twice in MEM
by centrifugation (600 x
g for 7 minutes). Cells were then diluted in MEM
for
transplantation into recipient testes.
Recipient Animals and Transplantation![]()
Two different types of recipient animals were used for transplantation
experiments. In order to assess transfection efficiency of donor MT-LacZ rat
SSCs by the EF1-eGFP lentivirus following overnight exposure, approximately 10
µL of cell suspension (4.59.2 x 105 cells/mL) was
transplanted into NCr nude mice (nu/nu; Taconic, Germantown, NY) testes in
which endogenous spermatogenesis had been abolished by busulfan treatment (44
mg/kg) 68 weeks prior (Orwig et al,
2002).
To generate transgenic offspring from rat SSCs transduced by the EF1-eGFP lentivirus, approximately 20 µL of donor MT-lacZ or S/D FACS separated germ cell suspensions (5.215.2 x 106 cells/mL) exposed to the lentivirus overnight were injected into the seminiferous tubules of recipient S/D rats (1822 days of age) via the efferent duct (Ryu et al, 2003). Endogenous spermatogenesis had been reduced in recipient S/D rat testes by busulfan treatment (10 mg/kg) at 810 days postpartum (DPP) (Ogawa et al, 1999). The Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania approved all experimental procedures in accordance with The Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academy of Sciences, Assurance no. A3079-0).
Analysis of Recipient Testes and Assessment of Transfection Efficiency![]()
Assessment of transfection efficiency and toxicity of the EF1-eGFP
lentivirus was conducted 3 months after transplantation of donor rat cells
into recipient nude mouse testes. Recipient testes were collected and viewed
using an epi-fluorescent dissecting microscope to detect eGFP-positive
colonies of spermatogenesis. Testes were subsequently stained with X-gal to
visualize colonies of spermatogenesis derived from the MT-lacZ donor cells.
The number of eGFP-positive and LacZ-stained colonies of spermatogenesis were
counted for each recipient testis and digital images of both colony types were
captured. Colonies expressing eGFP were considered those derived from donor
rat SSCs transduced by the EF1-eGFP lentivrus and thus containing integration
of the eGFP transgene. Blue X-galstained colonies represented total
colonization by the donor MT-lacZ SSCs irrespective of lentiviral
transduction. Lentiviral transduction efficiency was determined by dividing
the number of transduced eGFP colonies by the number of total lacZ-stained
colonies of spermatogenesis in each recipient testis.
Production and Analysis of Transgenic Offspring![]()
To produce transgenic offspring from transduced rat SSCs, recipient S/D
rats transplanted with donor MT-lacZ or S/D germ cells exposed to the EF1-eGFP
lentivirus were mated with S/D females beginning 1.5 months after
transplantation. Breeding was allowed to continue for 1121 months,
after which recipient males were sacrificed and the testes weighed. Pups
positive for eGFP expression were identified from litters by ultraviolet (UV)
light examination. Using this method, both male and female founders were
identified and used for generating eGFP transgenic lines. Offspring from these
founder animals were confirmed eGFP-positive by UV light examination, and some
were sacrificed and the organs examined for eGFP expression.
Southern Blotting![]()
Southern blotting was used to confirm the eGFP phenotype of the transgenic
animals and determine the integration pattern of founders and their F1
progeny. Genomic DNA (8 µg) was extracted from tail samples of transgenic
and control offspring, digested with BamH1, separated on a 0.8%
agarose gel, and transferred to a nylon membrane (Nytran SuPerCharge;
Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH). The membrane was hybridized overnight at
68°C with a 32P-labeled PCR-amplified fragment of eGFP cDNA
(445 bp; Prime-It DNA labeling kit; Stratagene, Cedar Creek, Tex).
Statistics![]()
Significant differences in transduction efficiency between the 2 MOIs and
toxicity of the lentiviral vector were evaluated using a Student's t
test and 1-way analysis of variance, respectively. All statistical analyses
were conducted using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
± SEM, n = 8 testes) and
35.8 ± 3.7% (n = 5 testes) at an MOI of 20 or 80, respectively. There
was no significant difference between the 2 MOIs. Also, a toxic effect of the
lentiviral vector on SSCs from increasing the MOI was not observed; this was
evaluated based on comparison between the number of lacZ colonies generated by
cells exposed to the lentivirus at an MOI of 20 (290.3 ± 63.6,
± SEM, n = 8 testes) or an
MOI of 80 (321.9 ± 53.5, n = 5 testes) and nonexposed control cells
(352.5 ± 53.4, n = 12 testes). Starting with an enriched cell
population, rat SSCs can be efficiently transduced with lentiviral vectors up
to at least an MOI of 80 without significant toxic effects.
|
Production of Transgenic Rats from Lentiviral Transduced SSCs![]()
Generation of transgenic animals using SSCs requires both effective
transduction and successful transplantation in which spermatogenesis is
restored in recipient males to a level at which fertility is reestablished
(Ogawa et al, 1999;
Ryu et al, 2003). At
1822 days of age, rats that had been treated with busulfan as pups
(810 dpp) were used as recipients for transplantation. A total of 10
busulfan-treated recipient rats were transplanted with donor rat germ cells
that had been exposed to the EF1-eGFP lentivirus (Table). Eight of the 10
recipients regained fertility between 104 and 256 days after transplantation.
All 8 recipients sired at least 1 eGFP-positive pup, demonstrating that normal
spermatozoa capable of fertilization and generation of transgenic offspring
could be derived from lentiviral transduced SSCs. The actual success of
transgenic progeny production was variable between recipient animals, ranging
from 1.3% to 13.6% of the total progeny produced. Overall, 5.8% of the total
progeny from all recipient males were eGFP positive and thus derived from
donor SSCs transduced with the EF1-eGFP lentiviral vector in vitro.
Transgenic eGFP founder animals were produced by mating recipient males to
wild-type S/D females. Two EF1-eGFP founders (1 male and 1 female) were
generated by breeding recipient male A2107 to a wild-type female
(Figure 2). The eGFP transgene
was inherited and expressed by at least 3 generations of progeny from this
recipient male, demonstrating its stable integration beginning with the
original donor SSC genome (ie, the transgene was not silenced during
development). The pedigree for progeny produced from this recipient
demonstrates that the transgene was transmitted and expressed by both sexes,
and inheritance followed a Mendelian pattern
(Figure 2). Progeny generated
from mating the founders with wild-type females expressed the eGFP transgene
in all tissues and organs (Figure
3). Examination of a founder male, produced from the mating of
recipient rat A2107, and his progeny using Southern blotting revealed a single
and identical integration site of the eGFP transgene
(Figure 4). Thus, stable
integration and expression of a transgene can be achieved through the male
germline using a lentiviral vector to modify the SSC
genome.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion and Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, 80% of the recipients transplanted with lentiviral-exposed SSCs sired offspring containing the genetic modification. Overall, 5.8% of the pups sired by the recipient rats contained the genetic modification and were thus derived from SSCs transduced in vitro by the lentiviral EF1-eGFP vector. Transgenic offspring production by pronuclear injection is approximately 5% efficient (transgenic progeny produced compared to eggs injected) in mice (Brinster et al, 1985), and no greater than 5% efficient in rats (Hirabayashi et al, 2001); however, the typical success rate is often lower, particularly in rats. Thus, SSC-mediated transgenic rat production in this study was at least as efficient as that of the best reported cases using pronuclear injection. In a previous study, 4 of 6 recipient rats transplanted with SSCs exposed to an eGFP lentiviral vector regained fertility and sired offspring, but only 1 animal (25% of the recipients) sired progeny containing the genetic modification in which 30% of the offspring were transgenic (Hamra et al, 2002). As can be observed from these 2 similar studies, the success of SSC transplantation is variable in rats, and enhancing the efficacy of the procedure can have a dramatic effect on the efficiency of generating transgenic animals through the male germline.
Multiple factors contribute to the overall efficacy of generating transgenic animals by transducing SSCs followed by transplantation and natural breeding, including SSC transduction efficiency and the success of transplantation. Use of an SSC-enriched testis cell population in this study was likely a contributing factor to increasing gene integration efficiency into stem cells and provides the basis for future experiments of generating transgenic animals through the male germline. In addition, the high efficiency of transduction using a lentiviral vector contributed to the high rate of gene integration into stem cells. Enhancing transplantation success for SSCs, defined by the degree of donor SSC colonization and amount of donor-derived sperm production relative to endogenous production in the recipient host testis, is a greater challenge, particularly in the rat. Transplantation success is greatly influenced by the removal of endogenous germ cells in recipient testes; however, a return of endogenous spermatogenesis is also essential for reestablishing fertility after transplantation of donor SSCs in the rat (Ogawa et al, 1999). We have previously shown that busulfan treatment of rat pups at 810 days of age is an effective means for preparing recipients for transplantation (Ryu et al, 2003). In this study, the effectiveness of this strategy was variable in inhibiting endogenous spermatogenesis of the recipient rat as an adult, as evidenced by the differences in testis sizes, which could have a major effect on the recipient's capability to sire progeny containing donor genetics. Preparation of recipient animals for transplantation represents an aspect of the procedure for generating transgenic rats using SSCs that requires further development. Indeed, generation of transgenic animals using transplantation of SSCs may be challenging in other species with the current methods for creating recipient animals, because maintenance of endogenous spermatogenesis may be essential for development of recipient fertility, or, in some species, it may be impossible to completely eliminate endogenous spermatogenesis.
Natural mating of recipient rats transplanted with donor SSCs that had been transduced by the EF1-eGFP lentiviral vector generated founder animals that were used to create homozygous transgenic rat lines. Similarly to other transgenic animal studies, the transgene was stably inserted into the donor SSC genome and inherited by both male and female progeny following a Mendelian pattern. Also, expression of the transgene was present in all tissues and remained constant for several generations. Thus, lentiviral vectors are clearly capable of efficiently transducing SSCs, and when this is combined with transplantation, transgenic animals can be effectively produced. Recently, long-term culture of rat SSCs has been achieved (Hamra et al, 2005; Ryu et al, 2005), providing a key tool for realizing the full potential for generating transgenic rats through the male germline. Maintaining SSCs in culture after transfection could allow for stably transduced cells to be selected and purified and for the numbers to be expanded. Using the principles reported in this investigation and previous ones, transgenesis is a technique that can potentially be utilized in future experimentation to assess gene function in rat models using gene knockout strategies developed for embryonic stem (ES) cells and recently reported for mouse SSCs (Kanatsu-Shinohara et al, 2006).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brinster RL, Chen HY, Trumbauer ME, Yagle MK, Palmiter RD. Factors
effecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by
microinjecting eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82: 4438
4442.
Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male
germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 11298
11302.
Bukrinsky MI, Haggerty S, Dempey MP, Sharova N, Adzhubel A, Spitx L, Lewis P, Goldfarb D, Emerman M, Stevenson M. A nuclear localization signal within HIV-1 matrix protein that governs infection of non-dividing cells. Nature. 1993;365: 666 669.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chang L-J, Urlacher V, Iwakuma T, Cui Y, Zucali J. Efficacy and safety analyses of a recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 derived vector system. Gene Ther. 1999; 6: 715 728.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clouthier DE, Avarbock MR, Maika SD, Hammer RE, Brinster RL. Rat spermatogenesis in mouse testis. Nature. 1996; 381: 418 421.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fritz IB. Reflections on the evolution of the regulation of spermatogenesis. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986; 226: 371 388.[Medline]
Hamra FK, Chapman KM, Nguyen DM, Williams-Stephens AA, Hammer RE,
Garbers DL. Self renewal, expansion, and transfection of rat spermatogonial
stem cells in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 17430
17435.
Hamra FK, Gatlin J, Chapman KM, Grellhesl DM, Garcia JV, Hammer RE,
Garbers DL. Production of transgenic rats by lentiviral transduction of male
germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 14931
14936.
Hirabayashi M, Takahashi R, Ito K, Kashiwazaki N, Hirao M, Hirasawa K, Hochi S, Ueda M. A comparative study on the integration of exogenous DNA into mouse, rat, rabbit, and pig genomes. Exp Anim. 2001; 50: 125 131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Ikawa M, Takehashi M, Ogonuki N, Miki H, Inoue
K, Kazuki Y, Lee J, Toyokuni S, Oshimura M, Ogura A, Shinohara T. Production
of knockout mice by random or targeted mutagenesis in spermatogonial stem
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 8018
8023.
Kubota HK, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Growth factors essential
self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 16489
16494.
Meistrich M, van Beek EAB. Spermatogonial stem cells. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL, eds. Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993; 266 295.
Miller AD. Retroviral vectors. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1992;158: 1 24.[Medline]
Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Pattern and kinetics of mouse
donor spermatogonial stem cell colonization in recipient testes.
Biol Reprod. 1999; 60: 1429
1436.
Nagano M, Brinster CJ, Orwig KE, Ryu BY, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL.
Transgenic mice produced by retroviral transduction of male germ-line stem
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 13090
13095.
Nagano M, Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Retrovirus-meditated gene delivery into male germ line stem cells. FEBS Lett. 2000; 475: 7 10.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagano M, Watson DJ, Ryu BY, Wolfe JH, Brinster RL. Lentiviral vector transduction of male germ line stem cells in mice. FEBS Lett. 2002;524: 111 115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ogawa T, Arechaga JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of testis germinal cells into mouse seminiferous tubules. Int J Dev Biol. 1997;41: 111 122.[Medline]
Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Brinster RL. Recipient preparation is critical for spermatogonial transplantation in the rat. Tissue Cell. 1999;31: 461 472.[CrossRef][Medline]
Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Retrovirus-mediated
modification of male germline stem cells in rats. Biol
Reprod. 2002;67: 874
879.
Rhim JA, Sandgren EP, Degen JL, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL.
Replacement of diseased mouse liver by hepatic cell transplantation.
Science. 1994;263: 1149
1152.
Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg AD. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, Fla: Cache River Press; 1990; 1 40.
Ryu BY, Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Conservation of
spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 14302
14307.
Ryu BY, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Stem cell and niche development in the postnatal rat testis. Dev Biol. 2003; 263: 253 263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ryu BY, Orwig KE, Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of spermatogonial stem cells in rats. Dev Biol. 2004; 274: 158 170.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verma IM, Somia N. Gene therapypromises, problems and prospects. Nature. 1997; 389: 239 242.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M. Kato, M. Takehashi, H. Morimoto, S. Takashima, S. Chuma, N. Nakatsuji, M. Hirabayashi, and T. Shinohara Production of Transgenic Rats via Lentiviral Transduction and Xenogeneic Transplantation of Spermatogonial Stem Cells Biol Reprod, December 1, 2008; 79(6): 1121 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Orwig, B.-Y. Ryu, S. R. Master, B. T. Phillips, M. Mack, M. R. Avarbock, L. Chodosh, and R. L. Brinster Genes Involved in Post-Transcriptional Regulation Are Overrepresented in Stem/Progenitor Spermatogonia of Cryptorchid Mouse Testes Stem Cells, April 1, 2008; 26(4): 927 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Honaramooz, S. Megee, W. Zeng, M. M. Destrempes, S. A. Overton, J. Luo, H. Galantino-Homer, M. Modelski, F. Chen, S. Blash, et al. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated transduction of male germ line stem cells results in transgene transmission after germ cell transplantation FASEB J, February 1, 2008; 22(2): 374 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Park Lentiviral vectors: are they the future of animal transgenesis? Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 159 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |