Journal of Andrology Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Epididymis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Right arrow Return to article

Table 2. Empirical prediction of bull fertility based on intensity of spots in 2-dimensional protein maps of accessory sex gland fluid (AGF)
  Regression Equations That Include, as Independent Variables, Intensity of Spots* on AGF Protein Maps   R2 and P Value

  1) PD{dagger} = –7.0–0.0005 x (spermadhesin) + 0.00015 x (osteopontin) + 0.0042 x (BSP 30 kDa)–3.59 x 10–7 x (BSP 30 kDa)2   R2 = .56, P < .0001
  2) PD = –8.15–0.0005 x (spermadhesin) + 0.0026 x (phospholipase A2) + 0.0048 x (BSP 30 kDa)–4.14 x 10–7 x (BSP 30 kDa)2   R2 = .53, P < .0001

  *Spot intensity given as ppm of the total integrated optical density, as calculated by PDQest software
  {dagger}PD indicates percentage point deviation from the average nonreturn rate of bulls; (spermadhesin): average intensity of two 14-kDa spermadhesins (spots 2201 and 2202); (osteopontin): intensity of a 55-kDa osteopontin (spot 9802); (BSP 30 kDa): average intensity of five BSP 30 kDa isoforms (spots 7303–8403); (phospholipase A2): average intensity of 2 isoforms of 58-kDa phospholipase A2 (spots 3801 and 4801), as shown in Figure 2





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS