| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the * Microsurgical Potency Reconstruction
Center, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Kang-Ning
General Hospital; and the
Department of
Pathology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| Correspondence to: Dr Geng-Long Hsu, Microsurgical Potency Reconstruction and Research Center, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, 424 Pa-Te Road, Sec 2, Taipei 105, Taiwan, ROC. |
| Received for publication June 11, 2003; accepted for publication June 20, 2004. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Electrocauterization, ligation, Peyronie disease, deep dorsal vein, impotence, corporeal fibrosis
There are many reasons and purposes for operating on the penis. It is generally acceptable to destroy the erectile capability if surgery is to eradicate a cancerous entity. In contrast, however, if an operation is designed for reconstruction, in which case reduced erectile capability may draw protests from the patient (Lue, 1989; Hauri, 1999; Porena et al, 2002), the surgeon should make every effort to preserve erectile function. Herein, we analyze 2 groups of patients who underwent venous patch surgery for treating Peyronie disease with or without the application of a Bovie.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the electrocoagulation group, 2 patients subsequently received a penile implant to treat their annoying erectile dysfunction. Some sinusoidal tissues were taken for histologic examination. In the ligation group, 1 patient underwent a second curvature correction in spite of the curvature being less than 15°, which did not prevent him from performing normal coitus. A piece of sinusoidal tissue was taken for histologic comparison. Masson trichrome stain was used.
Cefamezine (1000 mg) and gentamycin (80 mg) were routinely used intravenously and intramuscularly, respectively, as prophylactic drugs preoperatively; cefadroxil monohydrate (500 mg orally twice daily) and acetaminophen (500 mg 4 times daily) were prescribed for 1 week postoperatively. All were followed for satisfaction of penile morphology with a pharmacocavernosography (Figures 1 and 2) if required and assessed by the abridged 5-item version of the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) scoring for erectile capability. Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were applied whenever necessary.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Erectile function was unchanged in the ligation group, in whom a mean preoperative IIEF-5 score of 22.3 ± 1.9 varied to a mean postoperative IIEF-5 score of 22.9 ± 2.0. In the electrocoagulation group, the mean IIEF-5 score of 22.5 ± 1.6 decreased to a mean postoperative IIEF-5 score of 17.9 ± 4.1 despite the fact that the morphology was satisfactory. The group with electrocoagulation was statistically susceptible to infection (P = .001); of them 2 men (28.6%) sustained postoperative infection that was treated for 1 and 2 months, although the time for the operation was significantly reduced (P < .0001). The follow-up cavernosograms, which indicated relatively poor filling, are commensurate with intracavernosal fibrosis; 2 of 4 patients who sustained erectile dysfunction subsequently received a penile implant. Statistical significance (P < .01) was encountered between 2 groups postoperatively.
A histologic comparison (Figure 3) of both groups disclosed extensive fibrosis in the electrocoagulation group in which normal smooth muscle cells were not readily seen, while abundant amounts of collagen was characteristic. In contrast there were plenty of smooth muscle cells that intermingled with fewer collagen fibers in the ligation group.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, we planned to perform a penile biopsy every 6 months. The patients in the ligation group declined to receive such an invasive follow-up procedure. The patients in the electrocoagulation group were also unwilling. In spite of the fact that sinusoidal tissue was limited to 3 patients, the disadvantages of the electrocautery to the erectile capability are inferable in this study because the patients who received electrocautery consistently sustained poor erection, which was commensurate with poorer IIEF-5 scores associated with cavernosograms. This adverse effect, however, may be acceptable to the erectile capability if the electrocautery is targeted to the bleeders superficial to the Buck fascia rather than those related directly to the sinusoids of the corpora cavernosa. Similarly, a randomized experiment is promising, but most patients are not cooperative because the superiority of simple ligation, which requires a prerequisite of microsurgical drills in rats, is so obvious. We eagerly look forward to having a more comprehensive set of data based on ongoing cadaveric and animal studies.
Corporeal fibrosis is hypothesized to develop secondary to abnormalities in the regulation of normal collagen synthesis and degradation, which results in veno-occlusive dysfunction (Moreland, 2000). There are many vascular insults that induce intracavernosal fibrosis. Those events, such as hypoxia, ischemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hyperglycemia, ultimately result in smooth muscle cell atrophy and death and progressive fibrous accumulation (Moreland, 1998; Wespes, 2002). According to our investigation, the electrocoagulation may induce more extensive, remarkable, and irreversible impairment of those delicate erectile tissues. Some may feel that the cavernosometry rather than a cavernosogram may be a preferable tool to assess the sinusoidal status. We do not own these data of the patients since they were not prompted to consult us for erectile dysfunction before operation.
The subtunical venular plexus collects sinusoidal blood and is the origin of the emissary veins. These veinlets penetrate the sinusoid by branching several times. The emissary vein runs obliquely through the tunica albuginea and coalesces to drain into the deep dorsal vein. Once an emissary vein is stumped from the exit to the deep dorsal vein, its relationship to the sinusoids mimics a grapevine to a cluster of grapes (Banya et al, 1989). The electrocoagulation effect might be transmitted to the deep sinusoids if a Bovie is applied from the venous stump of an emissary vein, which, in turn, may lead to irreversible intracavernosal fibrosis, resulting in a bunch of raisins instead of grapes. Not surprisingly, erectile dysfunction may result.
It is generally agreed that excessive application of electrocoagulation current can produce tissue destruction extending far beyond the actual treatment site (Sebben, 1998). The treatment technique is crucial, however difficult to control, in applying a Bovie. As a result, slow healing (Liboon et al, 1997) and tissue necrosis can lead to an unsightly or hypertrophic scar. The postoperative infection that might be invited through the use of electrocautery is one of the major concerns in any type of penile surgery (Bennett and Kraffert, 1990; Soballe et al, 1998). Although modern cardiac pacemakers are very well shielded and provide excellent rejection of any external electric interference, electrocautery can have significant detrimental effects in the paced patients (Levine et al, 1986). Some studies have shown that electrosurgical smoke can carry viable viruses within the particulate matter of the smoke. Moreover, the administration of electrosurgical current to tissue produces immediate vaporization of fluids with an aerosolization of tissue fluids and blood. The microdroplets may be dispersed a great distance and possibly be inhaled by nearby medical personnel (Sebben, 1998).
In 1900, electric current was first used in a surgical procedure. There are 2 types of electrocautery devices that currently exist: the monopolar and the bipolar (Sebben, 1989). It is commonly believed that the bipolar device allows more precise delivery of energy during an operative procedure and higher current density than monopolar devices (Kerl and Staubesand, 1988). Although there are more advanced models of the Bovie available, which may cause fewer adverse complications to erectile tissues (Burns et al, 1999), and in spite of the fact that we have used a monopolar device in this study, we advise avoiding the application of a Bovie or similar tools since the generated energy is difficult to limit, and the penile tissue is unique and delicate. The penile hilum in the anatomic vicinity of the arterial, neural, lymphatic, and venous tissues is too close for a Bovie to be applied regardless of whether an advanced model is used.
Endothelial cells of the sinusoid can be reproduced via culturing of the corpus cavernosum, and the regeneration potential has been promising. However, its renaissance has not been proved. In our clinical experience, erectile capability cannot significantly be resumed within 3 years once a patient sustains erectile dysfunction after an operation. This implies that the adverse effect of a Bovie to the penis is irreversible. According to the available anatomic knowledge, the penis is a vascular organ in which the endothelial and smooth cells are susceptible to a Bovie effect. Therefore, it is not wise to apply an electrocoagulation to any vascular tissue in a reconstructive surgery.
Application of a Bovie appears to be disadvantageous to erectile tissues of the human penis. We feel that an electrocoagulation, preferably altered to a simple ligation, of the vessel stump should be avoided in this erectile organ in order to preserve erectile capability and avoid infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baskin LS, Erol A, Li YW, Liu WH. Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle: is safe mobilization possible? J Urol. 2000; 164: 977 -980.[Medline]
Bennett RG, Kraffert CA. Bacterial transference during electrodessication and electrocoagulation. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126: 751 -755.[Abstract]
Burns RL, Carruthers A, Langtry JA, Trotter MJ. Electrosurgical skin resurfacing: a new bipolar instrument. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25: 582 -586.[Medline]
Dewire D, Lepor H. Anatomic considerations of the penis and its lymphatic drainage. Urol Clin North Am. 1992; 9: 211 -219.
Hauri D. Penile revascularization surgery in erectile dysfunction. Andrologia. 1999; 31(suppl 1): 65 -76.
Hsu GL, Brock GB, Martinez-Pineiro L, Nunes L, von Heyden B, Lue TF. The three-dimensional structure of the tunica albuginea: anatomical and ultrastructural levels. Int J Impot Res. 1992; 4: 117 -129.
Hsu GL, Hsieh CH, Wen HS, Hsieh JT, Chiang HS. Outpatient surgery
for penile venous patch with the patient under local anesthesia. J
Androl. 2003;24: 35
-39.
Hsu GL, Hsieh CH, Wen HS, Kang TJ, Chiang HS. Penile venous anatomy: application to surgery for erectile disturbance. Asian J Androl. 2002;4: 61 -66.[Medline]
Kerl J, Staubesand J. Vascular thermocoagulation-perivascular nerve lesions. An ultrastructural report on the choice between monopolar and bipolar electrocoagulation. Acta Neurochir. 1988; 92: 123 -131.
Kramolowsky EV, Tucker RD. The urological application of electrosurgery. J Urol. 1991; 146: 669 -674.[Medline]
Levine PA, Balady GJ, Lazar HL, Belott PH, Roberts AJ. Electrocautery and pacemakers: management of the paced patient subject to electrocautery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986; 41: 313 -317.[Abstract]
Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116: 379 -385.[Medline]
Lue TF. Penile venous surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 1989;16: 607 -611.[Medline]
Moreland RB. Is there a role of hypoxemia in penile fibrosis: a viewpoint presented to the Society for the Study of Impotence. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10: 113 -120.[Medline]
Moreland RB. Pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction: the contributions of trabecular structure to function and the role of functional antagonism. Int J Impot Res. 2000; 12(suppl 4): S39 -S46.
Polk HC Jr, Cheadle WG, Franklin GA. Principles of operative surgery. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp DR, Evers MB, Mattox KL, Sabiston DC, eds. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2001 : 163-188.
Porena M, Mearini L, Mearini E, Costantini E, Salomone U, Zucchi A. Peyronie's disease: corporoplasty using saphenous vein patch graft. Urol Int. 2002;68: 91 -94.[Medline]
Sebben JE. Monopolar and bipolar treatment. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15: 364 -366.[Medline]
Sebben JE. Electrosurgery. In: Ratz JL, ed. Textbook of Dermatologic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998 : 457-472.
Soballe PW, Nimbkar NV, Hayward I, Nielsen TB, Drucker WR. Electric cautery lowers the contamination threshold for infection of laparotomies. Am J Surg. 1998; 175: 263 -266.[Medline]
Watson AB, Loughman J. The surgical diathermy: principles of operation and safe use. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1978; 6: 310 -321.[Medline]
Wespes E. Smooth muscle pathology and erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2002; 14(suppl 1): S17 -S21.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, H.-S. Chen, C.-H. Hsieh, R. M. Chen, H.-S. Wen, L.-J. Liu, and C. Chua Long-Term Results of Autologous Venous Grafts for Penile Morphological Reconstruction J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |