| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the * Department of Medical Sciences,
University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; and
Department of Medical Cell Biology, Biomedical
Center, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
| Correspondence to: Prof Gunnar Ronquist, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: gunnar.ronquist{at}akademiska.se). |
| Received for publication January 20, 2004; accepted for publication April 21, 2004. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Antisperm antibodies (ASA), autoantibody, MALDI-TOF, prostasomes, human
A proteomic analysis of human prostasomes applying microcapillary liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry revealed that they contained at least 139 proteins (Utleg et al, 2003). They were enzymes (35%), transport/structural proteins (19%), GTP proteins (14%), chaperone proteins (6%), signal transduction proteins (17%), and novel proteins (9%). Some of these components were already detected by other techniques in prostasomes (Ronquist et al, 1997; Ronquist and Nilsson, 2001).
We recently reported that circulating human anti-sperm antibodies (ASA) from immunoinfertile men and women recognized prostasomes at a high frequency (Carlsson et al, 2004). This shows that prostasomes are major auto-antigens for sperm-agglutinating ASA.
The aim of this study was to identify the proteins corresponding to the prostasome autoantigens. We used 2-dimensional electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MAL-DI-TOF) to identify the antigens for these autoantibodies. The mass spectrometry results can then be used to identify the proteins by comparing the peptides with MS-Fit (http://prospector.ucsf.edu) and ProFound (http://prowl.rockefeller.edu) or the licensed ProteinLynx Software (Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom).
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sample Preparation![]()
Prostasomes were isolated and purified as reported earlier
(Wang et al, 2001). In short,
semen samples were centrifuged for 20 minutes at 1 000 x g and
20°C to separate spermatozoa and other possible cells from the seminal
plasma, which was then pooled (1215 samples) and ultracentrifuged at 10
000 x g at 4°C for 15 minutes to remove cell debris. The
supernatant was subsequently subjected to another ultracentrifugation for 2
hours at 100 000 x g at 4°C to pellet the prostasomes. The
prostasomes were resuspended in 30 mmol/L Tris-HCl containing 130 mmol/L NaCl,
pH 7.6 (isotonic Tris-HCl buffer). This suspension was further purified on a
Sephadex G 200 column (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden), equilibrated
with the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer, at 4°C to separate the prostasomes from
an amorphous substance (Stegmayr and
Ronquist, 1982). The eluant was the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer, and
the eluate was monitored at 260 and 280 nm. Those fractions (512) with
initial elevated ultraviolet absorbances were collected and analyzed for
aminopeptidase N activity, a marker enzyme for prostasomes
(Ronquist et al, 1988). Ultraviolet-absorbing fractions with high aminopeptidase N activity were
pooled and ultracentrifuged at 100 000 x g at 4°C for 2
hours. The pellet representing the prostasomes was resuspended in the isotonic
Tris-HCl buffer and adjusted to a protein concentration of 2 mg/mL by the
Protein Assay ESL method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Production of Antibodies![]()
Chicken anti-prostasome antibodies were produced by immunizing chickens
according to Polson and von Wechmar
(1980). Briefly, seminal
prostasomes (2 mg/mL) serving as antigen were emulsified with an equal volume
of Freunds adjuvant. White Leghorn hens were immunized intramuscularly in the
breast muscle with 0.5 mL of the emulsified antigen. After the initial
immunization, the animals received 3 booster injections at 2-week intervals.
The first immunization was performed with Freunds complete adjuvant and the
booster immunizations with Freunds incomplete adjuvant. Eggs were then
collected, labeled and stored at 8°C until antibody preparation
(Larsson et al, 1993). The
antibodies were isolated by polyethylene glycol precipitation.
Two-Dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis![]()
The purified prostasomes were precipitated with a solution containing 8
mol/L urea, 4% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate
(CHAPS), 40 mmol/L Tris, and 0.2% (wt/vol) immobilized pH gradient (IPG)
buffer 310 for 1 hour at 4°C and ultrasonicated on ice for 1.5
minutes at 40 kHz. The extraction was then ultracentrifuged at 100 000 x
g and at 4°C for 2 hours. Extracted proteins in the supernatant
were collected and their protein concentration determined.
Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and immunoblotting were performed with Bio-Rad systems (Hercules, Calif), the Protean isoelectric focusing (IEF) cell and Protean II XI cell, according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
For the first-dimension electrophoresis (IEF), purified prostasomes (40 µg of soluble proteins) were rehydrated with a buffer consisting of 8 mol/L urea, 2% (wt/vol) CHAPS, 50 mmol/L dithiotreitol (DTT), and 0.2% IPG buffer 310. The IEF, using IPGs, was carried out by loading 300 µL of sample onto the 17-cm strips (Bio-Rad). Focusing was performed to a total of 65 kV·h using an IPGphor unit (20°C). The focused strips were equilibrated for 30 minutes in a solution containing 6 mol/L urea, 20% glycerol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 2% DTT, 40 mmol/L Tris HCl (pH 8.8), and traces of bromphenol blue. Alkylation of free cysteine residues was carried out for 30 minutes in the same solution containing 2.5% iodoacetamide instead of DTT.
The second dimension was carried out in a 10% SDS gel (Tris HCl, 1 mm thick, 17 x 17 cm IPG well), and protein visualization was by silver staining. Stained gels were analyzed with Image Master 2D Elite software (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Polypeptide quantities were calculated (ppm of the total integrated optical density).
2D-PAGE Western Blotting![]()
For immunoblotting, the proteins were electro-transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes (30 V, 15 hours). The membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 1%
bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For visualization of
the antigens, the membranes were incubated overnight with patient and control
sera (diluted in PBS, 1:200 for patient and control sera, 1:10 000 for the
chicken polyclonal antibody). The following day, the membranes were washed 3
times with PBS-Tween and incubated first with biotinylated anti-human
immunoglobulin G (IgG, Zymed Laboratories Inc, San Francisco, Calif) for 1
hour and thereafter with streptavidin alkaline phosphatase (Zymed) for 1 hour.
The visualization was made by NBT/BCIP (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The
membranes were also probed with a polyclonal chicken anti-prostasome antibody
(Immunsystem AB, Uppsala, Sweden) diluted 1:10 000 in PBS. The detection of
bound antibody was similar to the detection of patient samples except that a
biotinylated anti-chicken IgG antibody (Zymed Laboratories) was used instead
of the biotinylated anti-human IgG antibody.
Mass Spectrometry![]()
Proteins recognized by Western blotting were selected for identification
via mass spectrometry. Preparative gels loaded with 200 µg protein from
extracted seminal prostasomes were analyzed with Coomassie colloidal stain.
In-gel digestion was carried out with trypsin
(Jensen et al, 1999) and
digests were desalted with ZipTip (Millipore, Sundyberg, Sweden). Peptides
were eluted in 70% acetonitrile/5% formic acid. The eluate was mixed 1:1
(vol/vol) with a saturated matrix solution of
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic
acid in 30% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Mass mapping of tryptic
peptides was performed with a Voyager De Pro MALDI-TOF (Applied Biosystems,
Stockholm, Sweden) or with a TofSpec-2E MALDI-TOF (Micromass) mass
spectrometer, both equipped with a nitrogen laser (337 nm) and operated in the
positive ion mode. Trypsin fragments of masses 842.50 and 2211.10 daltons were
used as internal standards for spectra calibration. Data generated were
screened in databases with a mass tolerance of 20 ppm or less. Program used
for mass mapping were MS-Fit
(http://prospector.ucsf.edu)
and ProFound
(http://prowl.rockefeller.edu)
or the licensed ProteinLynx Software (Micromass).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Mass Spectrometry![]()
Proteins in 12 spots were successfully identified and are summarized with
their theoretical isoelectric points (pIs), molecular masses, accession
numbers, and gene names in the
Table. The two most frequent
antigens were prolactin-inducible protein (PIP), recognized by most patient
sera (19/20; 95%) and clusterin (17/20; 85%). In addition, 10 sporadically
occurring prostasomal antigens were identified viz alcohol dehydrogenase
(NADP+), annexin I, annexin III, BRCA 1-associated ring domain
protein 1, heat shock protein (27 kd), isocitrate dehydrogenase,
lactoylglutathione lyase, NG,NG-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1,
peroxiredoxin 2, and syntenin 1.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study demonstrated several prostasome antigens, which served as targets for ASA. Most frequently occurring antigens were PIP and clusterin.
The PIP gene, localized at 7q34 (Lander et al, 2001), is expressed in exocrine glands, such as the salivary and lacrimal glands, as well as in the seminal vesicles (Murphy et al, 1987a; Akiyama and Kimura, 1990). In pathologic conditions, it is overexpressed in breast cysts, breast cancers, and metastases of mammary origin (Murphy et al, 1987a; Losi et al, 1995). The protein binds to CD4 (Autiero et al, 1991) and inhibits CD4+ T-lymphocyte apoptosis (Gaubin et al, 1999). PIP, which is a 16.6 kd was secretory protein, is identical to gp17/secretory actin binding protein (Murphy et al, 1987b) and was previously described to be a prostasomal protein (Utleg et al, 2003). The protein from human seminal plasma and from breast cyst fluid shows different posttranslational modification patterns (Caputo et al, 1998). The functions of PIP are unclear (Autiero et al, 1997; Bergamo et al, 1997), although a role in passive mucosal immune defense has been proposed (Schenkels et al, 1997). The ability of PIP to bind to CD4 (Autiero et al, 1991) and to block CD4-mediated T-cell programmed death (Gaubin et al, 1999) suggests that this factor might modulate the immune response at insemination. Our finding of the occurrence of PIP on prostasomes, which are capable of interacting with spermatozoa, supports the contention that prostasomes, perhaps via PIP action on spermatozoa, can play a role in reproduction (cf Bergamo et al, 1997). With this in mind, it is not unexpected that PIP on prostasomes was the predominant antigen for ASA from our immunoinfertile patients.
Clusterin is a 7580-kd heterodimeric glycoprotein that was first identified as a component of the fluid from ram rete testis with the ability to enhance cell aggregation in vitro (hence, the name) (Blaschuk et al, 1983). It has a wide array of functions, including roles in reproduction, lipid transport, tissue remodeling, and apoptosis (Tenniswood et al, 1998; Bailey and Griswold, 1999; Hochgrebe et al, 1999). The concentration of clusterin in normal human seminal plasma is considerably higher than that found in serum (O'Bryan et al, 1990). Concentrations up to 15 mg/mL have been found, suggesting that, like the rat and ram homologs, clusterin is a major glycoprotein of the human reproduction tract (O'Bryan et al, 1990). Studies showed that postvasectomy samples had levels of clusterin in the normal range, meaning that this glycoprotein was also to a large extent produced in accessory sex glands (O'Bryan et al, 1990). This is consistent with our finding that clusterin is associated with prostasomes. The general belief is that clusterin in seminal plasma is mainly a seminal vesicle contribution (Spring-Mills, 1980). However, seminal clusterin is not only produced in the testes, epididymides, and seminal vesicles, but also, as shown here, in the prostate gland. This means that the function of the glycoprotein in the reproductive system is more complex than the previously suggested role in spermatogenesis (Sylvester et al, 1984). A significant, positive relationship has been demonstrated between clusterin concentration in the semen sample used for preparation of the sperm cells for in vitro fertilization and the fertilization rate (Liu et al, 1988). This is in line with our present finding of a high proportion of serum antibodies directed against prostasomal clusterin in our immunoinfertile patients.
Sperm studies have been performed with the use of membrane proteins (plasmalemma, inner and outer acrosomal membrane) prepared from spermatozoa, enriched and purified by means of a swim-up procedure, and seminal plasmas containing ASA from 20 infertile patients (Bohring et al, 2001). A total of 18 sperm antigens were identified, and 6 of the recognized proteins were isolated and analyzed by mass spectrometry and peptide matching. They were identified as heat shock proteins (HSPs) 70 and 70-2, the disulfide isomerase ER60, the inactive form of caspase-3, and 2 subunits of the proteasome (Bohring et al, 2001). Hence, there was an essential difference regarding recognized immunogens between the spermatozoa and the human prostasomes.
NG-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 and the annexins could be mentioned among the other prostasomal antigens, appearing sporadically as targets for the serum antibodies of our ASA patients. Monomethyl-L-arginine has been regarded as the standard nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. This and other methylated arginine compounds are synthesized in vivo by a family of enzymes known as protein arginine methyltransferases. Of the 3 known methylarginine residues formed in mammals, only asymmetrically methylated forms inhibit nitric oxide (NO) synthase. Therefore, endogenously produced, asymmetrically methylated arginines might modulate NO production (Donnelly et al, 1997; Arienti et al, 2002). The activity of the enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase that hydrolyzes asymmetric methylarginines might exert a regulatory function on the synthesis of NO in the reproductive tract, again emphasizing the influential role of prostasomes in the reproductive process.
Annexins hold a central hydrophilic pore functioning as a Ca2+ channel. Because prostasomes are rich in Ca2+ and Zn2+ (Tvedt et al, 1987; Ronquist, 1998), annexins could be involved in the recruitment of Ca2+ to the prostasomes. An increase of sperm Ca2+ was proportional to the fusion with prostasomes (Palmerini et al, 1999), and by this annexin action on prostasomes, a subsequent effect on spermatozoa could be registered.
The identification of prostasomal antigens as targets for ASA in blood samples of patients with immunological infertility is a new approach. The characterization and identification of these antigens are important for under-standing the mechanism by which ASA might impair sperm fertilization capacity because of the close interactions that prostasomes and spermatozoa are capable of. The uneven occurrence of these antigens as targets for ASA with a predominance of PIP and clusterin is of interest. Both are glycoproteins, which means that they might display different posttranslational modification patterns, perhaps giving rise to different isoforms and antibody responses. This, in turn, increases the possibility of finding unique antibodies against these prostasome glycoproteins relevant to infertility. The recognition of such antigens could also be important for potential immunocontraception (Frayne and Hall, 1999).
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allegrucci C, Ronquist G, Nilsson BO, Carlsson L, Lundquist M, Minelli A, Larsson A. Circulating human antisperm antibodies recognize prostasomes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2001; 46: 211 -219.
Andreou E, Mahmoud A, Vermeulen L, Schoonjans F, Comhaire F.
Comparison of different methods for the investigation of antisperm antibodies
on spermatozoa, in seminal plasma and in serum. Hum
Reprod. 1995;10: 125
-131.
Ariente G, Carlini E, Palmerini CA. Fusion of human sperm to prostasomes at acidic pH. J Membrane Biol. 1997; 155: 89 -94.[Medline]
Arienti G, Carlini E, Saccardi C, Palmerini CA. Nitric oxide and fusion with prostasomes increase cytosolic calcium in progesterone-stimulated sperm. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002; 402: 255 -258.[Medline]
Autiero M, Abrescia P, Guardiola J. Interaction of seminal plasma proteins with cell surface antigens: presence of a CD4-binding glycoprotein in human seminal plasma. Exp Cell Res. 1991; 197: 268 -271.[Medline]
Autiero M, Gaubin M, Mani JC, et al. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of gp17, a natural CD4 ligand from human seminal plasma inhibiting human immunodeficiency virus type-1 gp120-mediated syncytium formation. Eur J Biochem. 1997; 245: 208 -213.[Medline]
Bailey R, Griswold MD. Clusterin in the male reproductive system: localization and possible function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1999;15: 17 -23.
Bergamo P, Balestrieri M, Cammarota G, Guardiola J, Abrescia P. CD4-mediated anchoring of the seminal antigen gp17 onto the spermatozoon surface. Hum Immunol. 1997; 58: 30 -41.[Medline]
Blaschuk O, Burdzy K, Fritz IB. Purification and characterization
of a cell-aggregating factor (clusterin), the major glycoprotein in ram rete
testis fluid. J Biol Chem. 1983; 258: 7714
-7720.
Bohring C, Krause E, Habermann B, Krause W. Isolation and
identification of sperm membrane antigens recognized by antisperm antibodies,
and their possible role in immunological infertility disease. Mol
Hum Reprod. 2001;7: 113
-118.
Caputo E, Autiero M, Mani JC, Basmociogullari S, Piatier-Tonneau D, Guardiola J. Differential antibody reactivity and CD4 binding of the mammary tumor marker protein GCDFP-15 from breast cyst and its counterparts from exocrine epithelia. Int J Cancer. 1998; 78: 76 -85.[Medline]
Carlini E, Palmerini CA, Cosmi EJ, Ariente G. Fusion of sperm with prostasomes: effects on membrane fluidity. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997;343: 6 -12.[Medline]
Carlsson L, Nilsson BO, Ronquist G, Lundqvist M, Larsson A. A new test for immunological infertility: an ELISA based on prostasomes. Int J Androl. 2004; 27: 130 -133.[Medline]
Collins JA, Burrows EA, Yeo J, YoungLai EV. Frequency and
predictive value of antisperm antibodies among infertile couples.
Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 592
-598.
Dondero F, Gandini L, Lombardo F, Salacone P, Caponecchia L, Lenzi A. Antisperm antibody detection: 1. Methods and standard protocol. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997; 38: 218 -223.
Dondero F, Lenzi A, Gandini L, Lombardo F, Culasso F. A comparison of the direct immunobead test and other tests for sperm antibodies detection. J Endocrinol Invest. 1991; 14: 443 -449.[Medline]
Donnelly ET, Lewis SE, Thompson W, Chakravarthy U. Sperm nitric
oxide and motility: the effects of nitric oxide synthase stimulation and
inhibition. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997; 3: 755
-762.
Frayne J, Hall L. The potential use of sperm antigens as targets for immunocontraception; past, present and future. J Reprod Immunol. 1999;43: 1 -33.[Medline]
Friberg J. Immunoglobulin concentration in serum and seminal fluid from men with and without sperm-agglutinating antibodies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136: 671 -675.[Medline]
Gaubin M, Autiero M, Basmaciogullari S, et al. Potent inhibition of
CD4/TCR-mediated T cell apoptosis by a CD4-binding glycoprotein secreted from
breast tumor and seminal vesicle cells. J Immunol. 1999; 162: 2631
-2638.
Hochgrebe TT, Humphreys D, Wilson MR, Easterbrook-Smith SB. A reexamination of the role of clusterin as a complement regulator. Exp Cell Res. 1999; 249: 13 -21.[Medline]
Jensen ON, Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Mann M. Sample preparation methods for mass spectrometric peptide mapping directly from 2-DE gels. Methods Mol Biol. 1999; 112: 513 -530.[Medline]
Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409: 860 -921.[Medline]
Larsson A, Bålöw RM, Lindahl TL, Forsberg PO. Chicken antibodies: taking advantage of evolutiona review. Poult Sci. 1993;72: 1807 -1812.[Medline]
Liu DY, Du Plessis YP, Nayudu PL, Johnston WI, Baker HW. The use of in vitro fertilization to evaluate putative tests of human sperm function. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 272 -277.[Medline]
Losi L, Fante R, Di Gregorio C, et al. Biologic characterization of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Nuclear ploidy, AgNOR count, microvessel distribution, oncogene expression, and grade-related parameters. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995; 103: 265 -270.[Medline]
Meinertz H. Indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) as a screening procedure for antisperm antibodies. I. Methodological studies. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1987; 14: 129 -134.
Meinertz H, Hjort T. Detection of autoimmunity to sperm: mixed anti-globulin reaction (MAR) test or sperm agglutination? A study on 537 men from infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 86 -91.[Medline]
Murphy LC, Lee-Wing M, Goldenberg GJ, Shiu RP. Expression of the
gene encoding a prolactin-inducible protein by human breast cancers in vivo:
correlation with steroid receptor status. Cancer Res. 1987a; 47: 4160
-4164.
Murphy LC, Tsuyuki D, Myal Y, Shiu RP. Isolation and sequencing of
a cDNA clone for a prolactin-inducible protein (PIP). Regulation of PIP gene
expression in the human breast cancer cell line, T-47D. J Biol
Chem. 1987b;262: 15236
-15241.
O'Bryan MK, Baker HW, Saunders JR, et al. Human seminal clusterin (SP-40,40). Isolation and characterization. J Clin Invest. 1990;85: 1477 -1486.
Palmerini CA, Carlini E, Nicolucci A, Arienti G. Increase of human spermatozoa intracellular Ca2+ concentration after fusion with prostasomes. Cell Calcium. 1999; 25: 291 -296.[Medline]
Peters AJ, Ivanovic M, Jeyendran RS. Variation in antisperm antibody results using different assays. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1995;33: 140 -143.
Polson A, von Wechmar MB. Isolation of viral IgY antibodies from yolks of immunized hens. Immunol Commun. 1980; 8: 475 -493.
Ronquist G. Zinc enrichment in prostasomes. Int J Androl. 1998;21: 233 -234.[Medline]
Ronquist G, Frithz G, Jansson Å. Prostasome membrane-associated enzyme activities and semen parameters in men attending an infertility clinic. Urol Int. 1988; 43: 133 -138.[Medline]
Ronquist G, Jin M, Schrimpf S, Nilsson BO. Prostasomes and human reproduction. In: Motta PM, ed. Microscopy of Reproduction and Development. Rome: Antonio Delfino Editore; 1997: 213 -219.
Ronquist G, Nilson BO. Prostasomes. Wenner-Gren International Series, Vol. 81. London: Portland Press; 2001.
Ronquist G, Nilsson BO, Hjertén S. Interaction between prostasomes and spermatozoa from human semen. Arch. Androl. 1990;24: 47 -57.
Schenkels LC, Walgreen-Weterings E, Oomen LC, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC, Nieuw Amerongen AV. In vivo binding of the salivary glycoprotein EP-GP (identical to GCDFP-15) to oral and non-oral bacteria detection and identification of EP-GP binding species. Biol Chem. 1997; 378: 83 -88.[Medline]
Spring-Mills E. The seminal vesicles. In: Spring-Mills E, Hafez ESE, eds. Male Accessory Sex Glands. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press; 1980: 63 -77.
Stegmayr B, Ronquist G. Promotive effect on human sperm progressive motility by prostasomes. Urol Res. 1982; 10: 253 -257.[Medline]
Sylvester SR, Skinner MK, Griswold MD. A sulfated glycoprotein synthesized by Sertoli cells and by epididymal cells is a component of the sperm membrane. Biol Reprod. 1984; 31: 1087 -1101.[Abstract]
Tenniswood M, Wang Z, Lakins J, Morrissey C, O'Sullivan J, Tang H.
Clusterin in the male reproductive tract. J Androl. 1998; 19: 508
-516.
Tvedt KE, Kopstad G, Haugen OA, Halgunset J. Subcellular
concentrations of calcium, zinc, and magnesium in benign nodular hyperplasia
of the human prostate: x-ray microanalysis of freeze-dried cryosections.
Cancer Res. 1987; 47: 323
-328.
Utleg AG, Yi EC, Xie T, Shannon P, White JT, Goodlett DR, Hood L, Lin B. Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate. 2003;56: 150 -161.[Medline]
Wang J, Lundquist M, Carlsson L, Nilsson O, Lundkvist Ö, Ronquist G. Prostasome-like granules from the PC3 prostate cancer cell line increase the motility of washed human spermatozoa and adhere to the sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 96: 88 -97.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y Xiang and T Kato Use of Proteomics in Analysis of Autoimmune Diseases Lupus, July 1, 2006; 15(7): 431 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.P. Burden, C.H. Holmes, R. Persad, and K. Whittington Prostasomes--their effects on human male reproduction and fertility Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 283 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |