| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


From the * Population Center for Research in
Reproduction and the Department of Medicine, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington;
Department of
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Jena, Jena, Germany; and
Institute of Applied Physiology and Medicine,
Seattle, Washington.
| Correspondence: Dr John K. Amory, Box 356429, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 (e-mail: jamory{at}u.washington.edu). |
| Received for publication February 6, 2003; accepted for publication April 5, 2003. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Hypogonadism, androgen, lymphatics
Older forms of oral testosterone are alkylated at the 17-carbon position, greatly reducing their hepatic metabolism and improving their oral bioavailability. Unfortunately, these compounds are associated with an unacceptably high rate of liver toxic effects, including cholestatic jaundice, peliosis hepatis, and even liver tumors in one third to half of long-term users (Westaby et al, 1977; Turani et al, 1983; Lowdell et al, 1985). As a result, such 17-alkylated forms of testosterone are not considered safe for long-term use by most experts in the field (Snyder, 2001). Therefore, oral administration of testosterone is currently only safely accomplished by the use of testosterone undecanoate (TU), which is commercially available in many countries but not the United States. When administered orally, a portion of TU is absorbed via lymphatics and thereby bypasses hepatic "first-pass" metabolism (Coert et al, 1975; Nieschlag et al, 1975; Horst et al, 1976). TU is lymphatically absorbed due to its long lipophilic side chain in a fashion similar to triglycerides. The absolute bioavailability of testosterone after oral TU administration, however, is only approximately 6% (Täuber et al, 1986), implying that most of an oral TU dose is absorbed via the portal circulation and metabolized by the liver.
We hypothesized that a testosterone-triglyceride conjugate (TTC) would show superior absorption via lymphatics than TU and would therefore result in higher maximal serum levels of testosterone and improved bioavailability. One of us (G.K.E.S.) has synthesized such a compound and reported on its in vitro characteristics (Scriba, 1995a). Moreover, this type of drug-triglyceride conjugate has been demonstrated to improve the oral delivery of other poorly water-soluble drugs, such as phenytoin (Scriba et al, 1995b). In this report, we present our initial studies of the single-dose pharmacokinetics of a TTC after oral administration in a rabbit model.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Experimental Animals![]()
Juvenile female New Zealand white rabbits (Western Oregon Rabbit Center,
Philomath, Ore) weighing 2 to 4 kg were obtained and allowed to eat ad libitum
before dosing. Animals were sedated with 2 mg/kg of acepromazine maleate
(Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc, St Joseph, Mo), positioned in a
restraining device, and the dorsal auricular artery cannulated to facilitate
frequent blood sampling. After baseline blood samples were obtained, animals
underwent insertion of an orogastric tube according to published techniques
(Burr et al, 1987), TTC, TU, or
sesame oil placebo was instilled, and the tube removed. Doses of TTC and TU
were normalized for testosterone content (ie, 60% [wt/vol] for TU [molecular
weight, 480] and 30% [wt/vol] for TTC [molecular weight, 939]). Arterial blood
samples were obtained 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, and 600 minutes
after drug administration. Heparin (50 U in 0.5 mL) was instilled in the
catheter after each blood draw to ensure catheter patency. Each dose of TTC or
TU was tested in triplicate. Animals were restudied after a 2-week rest
interval to allow their blood volume to return to normal. The Animal Use
Committee of the University of Washington approved this protocol.
Testosterone Measurements![]()
Rabbit serum was obtained from whole blood by centrifugation (15 minutes at
2000 x g) and frozen immediately at -70°C until assayed.
Serum levels of testosterone were determined using a highly specific
fluoroimmunoassay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, Tex). The assay
sensitivity was 0.8 nmol/L, and the midrange intra-assay and interassay
coefficients of variation were 7.5% and 9.3%, respectively. Neither TTC nor TU
was found to cross-react in the assay up to a concentration of 100 nmol/L.
Statistical Analysis![]()
Testosterone measurements were averaged from each time point to obtain the
mean and SEM. Differences between means were compared by a t test.
Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoid rule from
t = 0 to the last measured level without smoothing or curve fitting
(PK Solutions, Summit Research, Montrose, Colo). The terminal half-life
(T
) was calculated from t = 90 to the last measured level.
For all comparisons,
< .05 was considered statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Testosterone Undecanoate![]()
Immediately before administration of TU, serum total testosterone levels
were less than 1.0 nmol/L. Oral administration of TU resulted in
dose-dependent increase in serum testosterone that persisted for up to 10
hours after administration (Figure 3A and
B). The maximum concentrations of serum testosterone observed
after oral administration of TU were 3.6 ± 1.0 nmol/L for 4 mg/kg and
11.9 nmol/L ± 3.4 nmol/L for 8 mg/kg (P < .01). The time to
reach the maximum concentration at each dose was between 90 and 120 minutes.
After peaking, serum total testosterone levels returned to baseline slowly
throughout the 10-hour observation period.
|
Comparative Pharmacokinetics![]()
Oral administration of TTC resulted in significantly higher maximum
concentrations and greater AUC values when compared with oral TU
(Table). At 8 mg/kg, the
maximum serum testosterone concentration achieved by oral administration of
TTC was 2.4 times higher than the maximum concentration in the TU group,
whereas at 4 mg/kg, the maximum serum testosterone concentration was 3.2 times
that achieved in the TU group (P < .01). The AUC for TTC was 1.8
times that of TU in the 8-mg/kg group and 2.6 times that of TU in the 4-mg/kg
group. The T
was 3 to 5 hours for both compounds at both doses tested
and did not differ significantly between groups.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in this rabbit model. This is likely due to the fact that once
absorbed, both compounds are rapidly hydrolyzed to testosterone and then
metabolized in a similar fashion. Since TU is thought to gain access to the systemic circulation via absorption by the intestinal lymphatics (Coert et al, 1975; Nieschlag et al, 1975; Horst et al, 1976), our initial hypothesis was that enhanced lymphatic absorption of testosterone could be accomplished by conjugating testosterone to a triglyceride molecule. Although our study does not directly demonstrate lymphatic absorption of TTC, given its extremely lipophilic molecular structure, it seems likely that TTC is absorbed primarily via the lymphatics. It is interesting to note, however, that the time required to reach maximum concentration was longer with the oral TU than with TTC. The reason for this difference requires further study and may reflect differential rates of in vivo hydrolysis between the 2 compounds.
Could TTC be useful for testosterone therapy in men? The metabolism of testosterone in rabbits has been extensively studied (Mahoudeau et al, 1973; Bourget et al, 1984), and it has been shown that rabbits metabolize testosterone at a rate twice that of humans (Wang et al, 1967). Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of TTC in humans may be superior to those demonstrated in this report. It is possible that alterations in the chemistry of compounds like TTC may allow for twice or possibly even once-daily oral administration in humans. Oral TU is widely used in Europe and Canada for testosterone replacement and is usually given 2 to 3 times daily, but the resulting testosterone levels can be highly variable (Davidson et al, 1987; Conway et al, 1988). Importantly, unlike 17-alkylated forms of testosterone, oral TU is thought to be safe for long-term use in humans (Gooren, 1994).
Novel means of testosterone delivery are needed given the large number of patients who require testosterone therapy. In addition to the treatment of male hypogonadism, more convenient modes of testosterone administration may be useful in bringing the promise of male hormonal contraception to fruition (Amory and Bremner, 2000). The ease of administration of an oral form of testosterone makes it an attractive alternative for patients; however, the effects of long-term testosterone-triglyceride administrations are unknown. Long-term use of such a compound will require additional studies of its safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amory JK, Matsumoto AM. The therapeutic potential of testosterone patches. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1998; 7:1977-1985.
Behre HM, Kliesch S, Leifke R, Link RM, Nieschlag E. Long-term
effect of testosterone therapy on bone mineral density in hypogonadal men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82:2386-2390.
Bhasin S, Bremner WJ. Emerging issues in androgen replacement
therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82:3-8.
Bourget C, Flood C, Longcope C. Steroid dynamics in the rabbit. Steroids. 1984;43:225-233.[Medline]
Burr DH, Kerner DT, Blanco CS, Bourgeois AL, Wistar R Jr. Gastric lavage: a simple method to obtain IgA-rich intestinal secretions from the rabbit. J Immunol Methods. 1987; 20:277-281.
Coert A, Geelen J, de Visser J, van der Vies J. The pharmacology and metabolism of testosterone undecanoate (TU), a new orally active androgen. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1975; 79:789-800.
Conway AJ, Boylan LM, Howe C, Ross G, Handelsman DJ. Randomized clinical trial of testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men. Int J Androl. 1988; 11:247.[Medline]
Davidson DW, O'Carroll R, Bancroft J. Increasing circulating androgens with oral testosterone undecanoate in eugonadal men. J Steroid Biochem. 1987;26:713-715.[Medline]
Fossa SD, Opjordsmoen S, Haug E. Androgen replacement and quality of life in patients treated for bilateral testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1220-1225.
Gooren LJ. A ten-year study of the oral androgen testosterone
undecanoate. J Androl. 1994; 15:212-215.
Horst HJ, Höltje WJ, Dennis M, Coert A, Geelen J, Voigt KD. Lymphatic absorption and metabolism of orally administered testosterone undecanoate in man. Klin Wochenschr. 1976; 54:875-879.[Medline]
Katznelson L, Finkelstein JS, Schoenfeld DA, Rosenthal KI, Klibanski A. Increase in bone density and lean body mass during testosterone administration in men with acquired hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:4358-4365.[Abstract]
Lowdell CP, Murray-Lyon IM. Reversal of liver damage due to long term methyltestosterone and safety of non-17-alpha alkylated androgens. BMJ. 1985;291:637-645.
Mahoudeau JA, Corvol P, Bricaire H. Rabbit testosterone-binding globulin: effect on androgen metabolism in vivo. Endocrinology. 1973; 92:1120-1125.[Medline]
Nieschlag E, Mauss J, Coert A, Kicovic P. Plasma androgen levels in men after oral administration of testosterone and testosterone undecanoate. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1975; 79:366-374.
Scriba GKE. Synthesis and in vitro degradation of testosterone-lipid conjugates. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 1995a; 328:271-276.
Scriba GKE, Lambert DM, Poupaert JH. Bioavailability of phenytoin following oral administration of phenytoin-lipid conjugates to rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1995b; 47:945-948.[Medline]
Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Berlin JA, et al. Effects of testosterone
replacement in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 2000;85:2670-2677.
Snyder P. Androgens. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG, eds. Goodman and Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 2001 :1635-1648.
Swerdloff RS, Want C, Cunningham G, et al. Long-term
pharmacokinetics of transdermal testosterone gel in hypogonadal men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85:4500-4507.
Täuber U, Schroder K, Düsterberg B, Matthes H. Absolute bioavailability of testosterone after oral administration of testosterone undecanoate and testosterone. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1986;11:145-149.[Medline]
Turani H, Levi J, Zevin D, Kessler E. Hepatic lesions in patients on anabolic androgenic therapy. Isr J Med Sci. 1983; 19:332-337.[Medline]
Wang C, Alexander G, Berman N, et al. Testosterone replacement therapy improves mood in hypogonadal men-a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996; 81:3578-3583.[Abstract]
Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Iranmanesh A, et al, Testosterone Gel Study
Group. Transdermal testosterone gel improves sexual function, mood, muscle
strength, and body composition parameters in hypogonadal men. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85:2839-2853.
Wang DY, Bulbrook RD, Sneddon A, Hamilton T. The metabolic clearance rates of dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone, and their sulfate esters in man, rat and rabbit. J Endocrinol. 1967; 38:307-318.[Medline]
Westaby D, Ogle SJ, Paradinas FJ, Randell JB, Murray-Lyon IM. Liver damage from long-term methyltestostosterone. Lancet. 1977; 2:262-263.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |