Journal of Andrology Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Epididymis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Right arrow Return to article

Effects of orchidectomy, efferent duct ligation, and hypophysectomy on cathepsin D expression in adult rat epididymisab
Groups Cell types IS IZ Caput Corpus Cauda

Control Principalc + + ++ ++ ++
Narrow/cleard ++ ++ ++ - -
Basal + ++ + - -
Orchidectomy Principal + + ++ ++ ++
Narrow/clear ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Basal + ++ + - -
Orchidectomy and testosterone supplementation Principal + + ++ ++ ++
Narrow/clear ++ ++ ++ - -
Basal + ++ + - -
Efferent duct ligation Principal + + ++ ++ ++
Narrow/clear ++ ++ ++ - -
Basal + ++ + - -
Hypophysectomy Principal + + ++ ++ ++
Narrow/clear ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Basal + ++ + - -

aData were similar at all time points after the different experimental treatments.
bIS indicates initial segment; IZ, intermediate zone.
cFor principal cells, the number of plus signs is directly proportional to the relative number of reactive lysosomes within these cells, ++ indicates that many spherical lysosomes were evident, +, few lysosomes were evident. For narrow, clear, and basal cells, ++ indicates intense reaction; +, moderate reaction; and -, absence of reaction. Although qualitative in nature, these data give an overall impression of the status of reactivity in the different epithelial cells based on at least 4 slides from each animal of each experimental group.
dNarrow cells are present only in the IS and IZ, whereas clear cells are present in the caput, corpus, and cauda epididymidis.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS