| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


From the * Reproductive Medicine Unit and
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, United Kingdom.
| Correspondence to: Dr Simon Wood MRCOG, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, United Kingdom (e-mail: simon_j.wood{at}virgin.net). |
| Received for publication May 20, 2002; accepted for publication August 23, 2002. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: ICSI, fertilization, pregnancy, surgical retrieval
Many centers have also begun to use cryopreserved, surgically retrieved spermatozoa in addition to freshly retrieved sperm. The clinical benefits to both partners are clearly evident from spermatozoal cryopreservation, in terms of a reduction in the number of surgical sperm retrievals (Oates et al, 1996; Nudell et al, 1998) as well as reducing the logistical complications in arranging concurrent oocyte and spermatozoal retrievals (Oates et al, 1996).
There is little evidence to suggest that a difference exists in fertilization, cleavage, and implantation rates or pregnancy outcome, regardless of the use of cryopreserved rather than fresh spermatozoa retrieved from the epididymis (Nagy et al, 1995; Oates et al, 1996; Cha et al, 1997; Friedler et al, 1998; Janzen et al, 2000; Cayan et al, 2001). In fact, some clinicians advocate the use of only cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa (Oates et al, 1996). The efficacy of using cryopreserved spermatozoa extracted from the testis is slightly more questionable. Although fertilization rates for cryopreserved spermatozoa extracted from the testis remain high, some studies have reported a small but significant reduction in both fertilization and implantation rates, with a corresponding reduced live birth rate (Gil-Salom et al, 1996; De Croo et al, 1998). Other studies have shown no difference (Friedler et al, 1997).
There is, however, a considerable lack of evidence for the optimum time between retrieval of spermatozoa and ICSI, when freshly retrieved epididymal or testicular spermatozoa are used in a concurrent ICSI cycle.
One large study that examined motility characteristics of fresh and cryopreserved spermatozoa suggested that epididymal spermatozoa demonstrated a gradual decrease in progressive motility for up to 5 days before all spermatozoa were immotile, whereas testicular spermatozoa could be cultured for up to 1 week before all motility was lost (Edirisinge et al, 1996). Cryopreserved spermatozoa gained little motility over 2-3 days after thawing before motility declined. A small study by Liu et al (1997) noted a small improvement in both morphology and motility in spermatozoa from patients with obstructive azoospermia after culture, reaching a peak at 72 hours. However non-motile spermatozoa did not gain motility in this study. In a further study by Angelopoulos et al (1999), spermatozoa motility peaked 48 hours after culture, whereas vitality decreased linearly from 56% at collection to 18% at 96 hours.
In a large prospective study of 143 patients with obstructive azoospermia undergoing testicular sperm retrieval 24 hours prior to ICSI, if the spermatozoa were cultured in the presence of recombinant FSH, a significantly greater number of oocytes were injected with motile spermatozoa, and hence fertilization and pregnancy rates were greater (Balaban et al, 1999). In a small study of 20 patients by Hu et al (1999), evidence suggested that spermatozoal motility improved after culture. Finally, in a study of 87 patients undergoing ICSI after successful percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), or testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or extraction (TESE) performed approximately 40 hours before the administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), then satisfactory fertilization and implantation rates per embryo of 53% and 15.7%, respectively were achieved (Urman et al, 1998).
In a further retrospective study of 47 cycles of treatment with testicular sperm from patients with nonobstructive azoospermia, no differences were noted in fertilization or clinical pregnancy rates between spermatozoa retrieved on the day of ovum pickup or 24 hours previous (Levran et al, 2001).
In this study we wished to assess the effect on fertilization and pregnancy rates of using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa within 4 hours of retrieval, following overnight culture or following cryopreservation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From the spermatozoa retrieved from men with obstructive azoospermia, 164 cycles of ICSI were performed, of which 73 involved the use of fresh testicular spermatozoa and 29 used fresh epididymal spermatozoa. Sixty-two cycles used cryopreserved spermatozoa (20 cycles used epididymal spermatozoa, 42 cycles used testicular spermatozoa.)
Surgical sperm retrievals were performed on a fixed operating day and the female partners underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using the standard long regimen so that oocyte retrieval could be performed either on the same day as sperm retrieval or the following day. In patients for whom cryopreserved spermatozoa were used, either excess spermatozoa cryopreserved from a previous fresh cycle were used, or sperm were electively harvested before controlled ovarian stimulation (COH).
Sperm Retrieval Methods![]()
Surgical sperm retrieval was performed under general anesthesia on a fixed
day (day 12 of ovarian stimulation). PESA was performed using the method first
described by Craft et al in 1993. The epididymis was identified and secured
between the thumb and index finger, and the remaining fingers and palm were
used to cup and stabilize the testicle. Epididymal fluid was aspirated blindly
from the epididymis via percutaneous puncture of the epididymis with a
19-gauge needle with suction obtained using a 20-mL syringe. The procedure was
performed under general anesthesia and the epididymal fluid was aspirated and
immediately examined under x400 brightfield microscopy for the presence
of motile spermatozoa. If no motile spermatozoa were observed the patient
underwent immediate TESE while still under general anesthesia. TESE was chosen
over microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) because it is a simpler
and quicker procedure, it is well tolerated, and has few side effects.
Although MESA is associated with retrieval of larger quantities of epididymal
spermatozoa than PESA, the requirement for enough spermatozoa to treat
patients in up to 20 ICSI cycles (Silber,
1996) is limited. With most data suggesting that the use of mature
testicular spermatozoa is not associated with any reduction in clinical
outcome compared with epididymal spermatozoa, many clinicians believe that the
much simpler testicular sperm extraction or aspiration techniques are more
cost-effective options than MESA.
TESE was performed as an open biopsy in which a small incision was made in the scrotal skin and the layers of tissue were opened through the spermatic fascia and the tunica vaginalis to the tunica albuginea. After opening the tunica albuginea, seminiferous tubules were removed. In order to extract usable spermatozoa from the tubules the tissue was minced and the tubes were "milked" with sterile needles (Tucker et al, 1995) to achieve the mechanical isolation of spermatozoa for ICSI.
Oocyte Stimulation and Retrieval, ICSI, and Embryo Transfer![]()
Female patients underwent a standard, long-protocol pituitary
desensitization with a gonadotropin hormone-releasing agonist (Suprecur,
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Frankfurt, Germany). COH began on a fixed day with
human menopausal gonadotropin hMG (Menogon, Ferring GmBh, Kiel, Germany). The
cycle was monitored via ultrasound after 10 days of stimulation. For patients
who achieved three follicles or more of >16 mm, oocyte retrieval was
arranged for day 12 or 13 depending upon the size of the lead follicle. Oocyte
retrieval was performed under sedation anesthesia. Retrieved oocytes were
processed in the laboratory in the manner described by Hillier et al
(1984) and cultured in P1
medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, Calif) supplemented with 10% v/v SSS
(Irvine Scientific) in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37°C.
After approximately 4 hours of incubation the oocytes were mechanically
denuded of their cumulus and coronal cells following brief exposure to
hyaluronidase (Hyase, IVF Science Scandinavia, Goteborg, Sweden).
Epididymal spermatozoa were washed by centrifugation at 600 x g in P1 medium for 10 minutes, followed by resuspension in 1 mL of fresh medium. Testicular spermatozoa extracted from the seminiferous tubules were washed by centrifugation at 600 x g in P1 medium for 10 minutes followed by resuspension in 3 mL of fresh medium. If required, the following day the sample was cultured overnight at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and observed for motile spermatozoa the following morning. Only motile spermatozoa with normal morphology were used for ICSI, and these were transferred to PVP (ICSI-100, IVF Science Scandinavia) for immobilization before injection. Injected oocytes were cultured in P1 medium and examined for the presence of pronuclei approximately 18 hours following ICSI.
A maximum of three embryos were transferred into the uterus approximately 2 days after ICSI. Embryo quality was assessed by standard morphological appearances with light microscopy (Scott et al, 1991). Successful implantation was determined by positive urinary ß-hCG and a clinical pregnancy by the presence of a fetal heartbeat during vaginal scan 4-6 weeks following embryo transfer.
Data on the number of oocytes collected, injected, fertilized, and cleaved were recorded for each cycle, as were the number of high-quality embryos available for transfer and cryopreservation, and pregnancy outcomes.
Cryopreservation and Thawing![]()
Excess epididymal and testicular spermatozoa not used for ICSI were
cryopreserved (using SpermFreeze, FertiPro N.V.) in 0.5-mL straws using a
slow-freeze method (Mahedevan et al,
1993). Straws were thawed rapidly at 37°C for 10 minutes.
Cryoprotectant was removed with the dropwise addition of P1 medium followed by
centrifugation at 600 x g for 10 minutes and resuspension in
0.5 mL of fresh medium.
Statistical Analysis![]()
Statistical analyses were performed using independent t tests,
ANOVA, and chi-square tests to assess differences between the results achieved
using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa. To compare fertilization rates
between groups in which spermatozoa were used within 4 hours, sperm cultured
overnight or with cryo-preservation, we used ANOVA with a Tukey post-hoc
analysis. To compare the demographics of age, FSH levels in women, and
metaphase II oocytes available for ICSI, we used independent t tests.
Wilcoxon tests were used for nonparametric data, including assessment of
embryo cleavage rates and number of grade I embryos available for transfer or
freezing. Chi-squares were used to detect differences in pregnancy rates.
Results were considered significant at P < .05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was no significant difference between the ages of men and women, number of metaphase II oocytes available for injection or fertilization, and cleavage rates between fresh, overnight cultured, and cryopreserved epididymal or testicular spermatozoa. There were also no significant differences in the number of high-quality (grade I) embryos available for transfer or cryopreservation, number of embryos transferred, or clinical pregnancy rate, when fresh or frozen spermatozoal retrieval from the epididymis or testicle were compared (Table 1).
|
Most ICSI treatments with fresh epididymal spermatozoa were performed within 4 hours of collection. However, if motile spermatozoa were used, the following day (24-28 hours after collection) there was a small but non-significant decrease in fertilization rates from 67.4% to 55.9% (P = .23), but a small, nonsignificant increase in the number of grade I embryos were available from 3.4 to 4.9, and there was no significant effect on clinical pregnancy rates (Table 2). Good fertilization rates were achieved with cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa compared with those when fresh spermatozoa were used, and this was associated with the greatest pregnancy rate for all modes of treatment. There was a significant increase in pregnancy rates of 50% compared with 17%; P = .049, compared with freshly retrieved epididymal spermatozoa (Table 2).
|
When motile retrieved testicular spermatozoa were used, an even distribution of patients underwent ICSI with spermatozoa retrieved within 4 hours, with spermatozoa retrieved between 24-28 hours, and with cryo-preserved spermatozoa. There was a small but nonsignificant increase in fertilization rates with spermatozoa used after culture for 24-28 hours, and no significant differences in terms of cleavage rates, grade I embryos, or clinical pregnancy rates whether the spermatozoa were used within 4 hours, 24-28 hours, or after cryopreservation (Table 3). The reduction in pregnancy rates between fresh and frozen testicular spermatozoa was 24% (17 of 72) to 14% (6 of 42), respectively (P = .334) and was not statistically significant.
|
The data collected on obstetric outcome of these pregnancies showed no evidence of abnormalities, gestation, or birth weights.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fertilization success achieved with cryopreserved spermatozoa is also significant in offering couples greater ease in planning their treatment by electively collecting spermatozoa before a woman undergoes ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection. Indeed, some proponents suggest that this is the optimum form of treatment (Oates et al, 1996) and should be used exclusively.
Of interest is a significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates with the use of cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa. This improvement in pregnancy rates does not occur when cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa are used. The reason for this is not known, but we do know that epididymal spermatozoa show higher rates of DNA damage (Steele et al, 1999) presumably due to the heterologous population of spermatozoa that accumulate and are stored within the epididymis. It could therefore be postulated that these damaged spermatozoa may lose motility or even viability in the cryopreservation process, and thus motile spermatozoa after thawing may exhibit less damage or even lower incidences of aneuploidy. Further studies are needed to assess whether motile spermatozoa after cryopreservation differ from those in the precryopreservation population.
Motile testicular spermatozoa have less DNA damage (Steele et al, 1999) and this may be why there is no significant difference in pregnancy rates when either fresh or frozen thawed testicular spermatozoa are used.
Previous papers have already stated the benefit to couples undergoing treatment and clinicians who care for them in advancing the sperm retrieval process up to and even before women receive hCG (Levran et al, 2001). These benefits include increasing the time available for embryological staff to search for motile spermatozoa, better planning of operating room timetables, and allowing the couple more time to decide whether they wish to proceed with donor treatment if no spermatozoa are found.
Even though the benefits of establishing an optimal timing for using freshly retrieved spermatozoa are clear, the case for a large prospective trial would be difficult to justify given the obvious benefits to both patients and clinicians in using cryopreserved spermatozoa. This study, like others (Nagy et al, 1995; Oates et al, 1996; Cha et al, 1997; Friedler et al, 1998, Janzen et al, 2000; Cayan et al, 20001) has shown no decrease in fertilization rates, embryo cleavage rates, grade 1 embryos, or clinical pregnancy rates when using frozen thawed spermatozoa. Indeed, this study is the first to have shown an improvement in clinical pregnancy rates when using cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa.
From this study we would suggest that the major benefit from culturing retrieved spermatozoa, particularly testicular spermatozoa, is to not alter fertilization or pregnancy rates, but to optimize the number of motile spermatozoa from the sample for cryopreservation for use in future cycles. Indeed, a recent paper has suggested that testicular spermatozoa recovered for obstructive azoospermia and cultured for 72 hours showed both a significant increase in motility (20% vs 53%) and a significant increase in spermatozoa with double-stranded DNA (46% vs 80%). This significantly increased the number of spermatozoa available for cryopreservation, and more significantly, it increased the subsequent postthaw survival rate (Emiliani et al, 2001). This pattern was not seen in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, Nuhoglu
A. In vitro culture of spermatozoa induces motility and increase implantation
and pregnancy rates after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic
sperm injection. Hum Reprod.1999; 14:2808
-2811.
Cayan S, Lee D, Conaghan J, Givens C, Ryan IP, Schriok ED, Turek P.
A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal
spermatozoa from the same couples. Hum Reprod.2001; 16;495
-499.
Cha K, Oum K, Kim H. Approaches for obtaining sperm in patients with male factor infertility. Fertil Steril.1997; 67:985 -995.[Medline]
Craft I, Benett V, Nicholson N. Fertilising ability of testicular spermatozoa. (letter). Lancet.1993; 342:864 .
Craft I, Tsirigotis M, Benett V, Taranissi M, Khalifa Y, Hogewind G, Nicholson N. Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the management of infertility due to obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril.1995; 63:1038 -1042.[Medline]
De Croo I, Van der Elst J, Everaert K, De Sutter P, Dhont M.
Fertilization, pregnancy and embryo implantation rates after ICSI with fresh
or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod.1998; 13:1893
-1897.
Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goosens N, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Silber S. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction(TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in non obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod.1995; 10:1457 -1460.
Edirisinghe W, Junk S, Matson P, Yovich J. Changes in motility
patterns during in-vitro culture of fresh and frozen/thawed testicular and
epididymal spermatozoa: implications for planning treatment by
intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod.1996; 11:2474
-2476.
Emiliani S, Van Den Bergh M, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Verdoodt M,
Englert Y. Evidence of reduced single stranded testicular sperm DNA from
obstructive azoospermic men after 3 days of in vitro culture. Hum
Reprod. 2001;16:1200
-1203.
Friedler S, Raziel A, Soffer Y, Strassburger D, Komarovsky D, Ron-el R. Intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa in patients with non-obstructive azoospermiaa comparative study. Fertil Steril.1997; 68:892 -897.[Medline]
Friedler S, Raziel A, Soffer Y, Strassburger D, Komarovsky D,
Ron-el R. The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved
epididymal spermatozoa from patients with obstructive azoospermia-a
comparative study. Hum Reprod.1998; 13:1872
-1877.
Gil-Salom M, Romero J, Minguez Y, Molero MD, Remohi J, Pellicer A.
Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with cryopreserved
testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod.1996; 11:1309
-1313.
Hillier S, Dawson K, Afnan M. Embryo culture: quality control in clinical in vitro fertilization. In: Thompson W, Joyce DN, Newton J, eds. Proceedings of the Twelfth Study Group of the Royal College Of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, In Vitro Fertilization and Donor Insemination. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1984:125 -140.
Hirsh A, Mills C, Tan SL, Bekir J, Rainsbury P. Pregnancy using spermatozoa aspirated from the vas deferens in a patient with ejaculatory failure due to spinal injury. Hum Reprod.1993; 11:89 -90.
Hu Y, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, Ory SJ, Licht MR, Eager S. Clinical application of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using in vitro cultured testicular spermatozoa obtained the day before egg retrieval. Fertil Steril.1999; 72:666 -669.[Medline]
Janzen N, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z. Use of electively cryopreserved microsurgically aspirated epididymal sperm with IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril.2000; 74:696 -701.[Medline]
Jow WW, Steckel J, Schlegel PN, Magid MS, Goldstein M. Motile sperm
in human testis biopsy specimens. J Androl.1993; 14:194
-198.
Levran D, Ginath S, Farhi J, Nahum H, Glezerman M, Weissman A. Timing of testicular sperm retrieval procedures and in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:380 -383.[Medline]
Liu J, Tsai YL, Katz E, Compton G, Garcia JE, Baramki TA. Outcome
of in-vitro culture of fresh and frozen thawed human testicular spermatozoa.
Hum Reprod.1997; 12:1667
-1672.
Mahedevan M, Trounson A. Effect of cryoprotective media and dilution methods on the preservation of human spermatozoa. Andrologia.1993; 15:355 -366.
Nagy Z, Liu J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Using ejaculated, fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril.1995; 63:808 -815.[Medline]
Nudell DM, Conaghan J, Pedersen RA, Givens CR, Schriock ED, Turek
PJ. The mini-micro-epididymal sperm aspiration for sperm retrieval: a study of
urological outcomes. Hum Reprod.1998; 13:1260
-1265.
Oates R, Lobel S, Harris D, Pang S, Burgess CM, Carson RS. Efficacy
of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using intentionally cryopreserved
epididymal sperm. Hum Reprod.1996; 11:133
-138.
Schoysman R, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal ML, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, Van Roosendaal E, Schoysman D. Pregnancy after fertilization with human testicular sperm. Lancet.1993; 342:1237 .
Scott RT Jr, Hofmann GE, Veeck LL, Jones HW Jr, Muasher SJ. Embryo quality and pregnancy rates in patients attempting pregnancy through in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril.1991; 55:426 -428.[Medline]
Silber S. Micoepididymal sperm aspiration or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration? The dilemma. Hum Reprod.1996; 11:681 .
Silber SJ, Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Devroey
P. High fertilization and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm
injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicular biopsy. Hum
Reprod. 1995;10:148
-152.
Steele E, McClure N, Lewis S. A comparison of DNA damage in
testicular and proximal epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia.
Mol Hum Reprod.1999; 5:831
-835.
Temple-Smith PD, Southwick GJ, Yates CA, Trounson AO, de Kretzer DM. Human pregnancy by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm aspirated from the epididymis. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf.1995; 2:119 -122.
Tucker M, Morton P, Witt M, Wright G. Intracytoplasmic sperm
injection of testicular and epididymal spermatozoa for treatment of
obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod.1995; 10:486
-489.
Urman B, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Nuhoglu A, Sertac A, Balaban B. Performing testicular or epididymal sperm retrieval prior to the injection of hCG. J Assist Reprod Genet.1998; 15:125 -128.[Medline]
Van Steirtegham A, Nagy Z, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenwillen C,
Tournaye H, Derde M, Van Assche E, Devroey P. High fertilization and
implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum
Reprod. 1993;8:1061
-1066.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Kovacic, V. Vlaisavljevic, and M. Reljic Clinical Use of Pentoxifylline for Activation of Immotile Testicular Sperm Before ICSI in Patients With Azoospermia J Androl, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, and J.W.A. Ramsay The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |