| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |





From the * Department of Medical Genetics and
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Faculty of Medicine, and
Department of
Genetics, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada;
and
Cancer Center Biometry Section, Northwestern
University, Chicago, Illinois.
| Correspondence to: Dr Renée H. Martin, Medical Genetics Clinic, 1820 Richmond Road SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2T 5C7 (e-mail: rhmartin{at}ucalgary.ca). |
| Received for publication April 2, 2002; accepted for publication August 22, 2002. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Sperm chromosome analysis, male infertility, fluorescence in situ hybridization
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal Control Donors![]()
Normal healthy men with no history of childhood diseases, chronic
disorders, environmental exposure, substance abuse, radiation exposure, or
prescription drug use made up the control group. The 18 men were between the
ages of 23-58 years with a mean of 35.6 years. All donors had normal semen
profiles (World Health Organization,
1992); 11 were of proven fertility and 7 were of unproven
fertility (Kinakin et al,
1997). Sperm samples were produced by masturbation and were
cryopreserved until FISH analysis. We have previously demonstrated that
cryopreservation has no effect on the frequency or type of chromosomal
abnormalities in human spermatozoa (Martin
et al, 1991).
Sperm Preparation![]()
Frozen testicular biopsy samples were washed twice with Tris-NaCl and
centrifuged at 600 x g for 6 minutes. The supernatant was
removed, the pellet was resuspended in less than 100 µL Tris-NaCl, and two
5-µL aliquots of suspension were applied over the same 2 cm2
area on a microscope slide, and were air-dried after each application. Slides
were dehydrated in 80% methanol at -20°C for 20 minutes, then dried
overnight at room temperature. The sperm DNA on the slides was
microwave-decondensed with 200 µL of 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma,
Oakville, ON) in 0.1 M Tris (550 watts, 15 seconds), followed by 200 µL of
10 mM lithium diiodosalicylate (LIS; Sigma)/1 mM DTT in 0.1 M Tris (550 watts,
1.5 minutes). Slides were rinsed with two 200 µL aliquots of 2x
SSC/0.1% NP-40 (Non-idet P-40, Sigma), air-dried at room temperature, then
dehydrated in 80% methanol at -20°C for 20 minutes, air-dried, and used
immediately.
Microwave Codenaturation of Sperm and Probes and Hybridization![]()
Slides were warmed to 37°C, XY1 probe solution was applied to the sperm
area, and a coverslip was sealed in place. Sperm and probe were microwave
codenatured at 1100 watts for 80 seconds, followed by hybridization in a
humidified chamber at 37°C for 18-24 hours. Preparation of chromosome
probes and probe solution is described elsewhere
(Kinakin et al, 1997).
One at a time, slides were laid flat on a preheated slide warmer and posthybridized with 200 µL of 2x SSC at 70°C for 2 minutes. After rinsing twice with 200 µL of 2x SSC/0.1% NP-40, hybridized areas were treated for 10-20 seconds with 0.05 µg/µL propidium iodide (Sigma), air-dried in the dark at room temperature for about 5 minutes, coverslipped in antifade solution (0.25 mg/mL p-phenylenediamine, Sigma), and stored in the dark. Complete details of the microwave decondensation/codenaturation technique are described elsewhere (Ko et al, 2001).
Scoring of Sperm Nuclei![]()
Slides were counted using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope fitted with four
filter sets: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), rhodamine/FITC, DAPI, and
rhodamine/FITC/DAPI. Two same-colored signals were counted as individual
signals if they were separated by at least one signal diameter (
signal diameter for the overlarge Y signal) and were of similar size, shape,
and intensity. The chromosome 1 signal was used as an internal autosomal
control to distinguish between disomy and diploidy. One person was involved in
the assessment of slides. The time required to analyze the slides was
approximately three to five times that of normal men because of the dearth of
spermatozoa on the slides.
Statistical Analysis![]()
Statistical analysis was performed by a two-tailed Z statistic
(Rosner, 1995).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To our knowledge, only four other laboratories have reported sperm chromosomal abnormalities in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Bernardini et al (2000) reported three men with nonobstructive azoospermia and were able to analyze approximately 200 sperm cells per patient. They found a highly significant increase in the frequency of autosomal disomy for chromosomes 1 (2.4%) and 17 (4.9%), as well as sex chromosomes (11.7% for XY, 5.8% for XX, and 6.2% for YY cells) compared with control donors. Levron et al (2001a,b) studied nine men with nonobstructive azoospermia. They analyzed a total of 153 sperm in 9 infertile patients and found a significantly increased frequency of total aneuploidy in patients compared with 6 control donors. The frequencies of XY, XX, and YY disomy were 3.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% respectively. Palermo et al (2002) studied 490 sperm from 5 men with nonobstructive azoospermia. They found an increased frequency of autosomal disomy (2.0%) and sex chromosomal disomy (4.3%) in azoospermic patients, with a significantly higher overall aneuploidy frequency in azoospermic patients (11.8%) compared with ejaculated sperm from normal men (1.5%). Burello et al (2002) studied 2723 testicular sperm from 6 men and found a significantly increased frequency of sperm disomy for chromosomes 8 (1.03%), 18 (1.23%), X (1.23%), and Y (0.77%). Thus all these studies have suggested a significantly increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in testicular sperm samples. The sample sizes to date have been unavoidably small: before this study approximately 4000 testicular sperm had been analyzed from 23 men. With our new microwave decondensation and codenaturation technique we have been able to substantially increase the sample size in our study to 59 916 sperm from 6 men. Even with this much larger sample we have not shown a great increase in frequency of sperm aneuploidy, however, it is clear that there is considerable variation in the risk of aneuploidy in testicular sperm, as shown by our donor F.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bernardini L, Gianaroli L, Fortini D, et al. Frequency of hyper-,
hypohaploidy and diploidy in ejaculate, epididymal and testicular germ cells
of infertile patients. Hum Reprod.2000; 15:2165
-2172.
Bernardini L, Martini E, Geraedts J, Hopman A, Lanteri S, Conte N,
Capitanio G. Comparison of gonosomal aneuploidy in spermatozoa of normal
fertile men and those with severe male factor detected by in-situ
hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod.1997; 3:431
-438.
Burello N, Calogero AE, De Palma A, et al. Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in patients with azoospermia. Eur J Hum Genet.2002; 10:362 -366.[Medline]
Kinakin B, Rademaker A, Martin R. Paternal age effect of YY aneuploidy in human sperm, as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet.1997; 78:116 -119.[Medline]
Ko E, Rademaker A, Martin R. Microwave decondensation and codenaturation: a new methodology to maximize FISH data from donors with very low concentrations of sperm. Cytogenet Cell Genet.2001; 95:143 -145.[Medline]
Lahdetie J, Saari N, Ajosenpaa-Saari M, Mykkanen J. Incidence of aneuploid spermatozoa among infertile men studied by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am J Med Genet.1997; 71:115 -121.[Medline]
Levron J, Aviain-Goldring A, Madgar I, Raviv G, Barkai G, Dor J. Sperm chromosome abnormalities in men with severe male factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril.2001a; 76:479 -484.[Medline]
Levron J, Aviain-Goldring A, Madgar I, Raviv G, Barkai G, Dor J. Studies on sperm chromosomes in patients with severe male factor infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001b;183:523 -528.
Martin R. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities following ICSI.
Hum Reprod.1996; 11:924
-925.
Martin R, Chernos J, Rademaker A. Effect of cryopreservation on the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities and sex ratio in human sperm. Mol Reprod Dev.1991; 30:159 -163.[Medline]
Martin R, Greene C, Rademaker A, Barclay L, Ko E, Chernos J.
Chromosome analysis of spermatozoa extracted from testes of men with
non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod.2000; 15:1121
-1124.
McInnes B, Rademaker A, Greene C, Ko E, Barclay L, Martin R.
Abnormalities for chromosomes 13 and 21 detected in spermatozoa from infertile
men. Hum Reprod.1998; 13:2787
-2790.
Moosani N, Pattinson H, Carter M, Cox D, Rademaker A, Martin R. Chromosomal analysis of sperm from men with idiopathic infertility using sperm karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:811 -817.[Medline]
Palermo G, Colombero L, Hariprashad J, Schlegel P, Rosenwaks Z.
Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular sperm in azoospermic patients
undergoing ICSI. Hum Reprod.2002; 17:570
-575.
Pang M, Hoegerman S, Cuticchia A, Moon S, Doncel G, Acosta A,
Kearns W. Detection of aneuploidy for chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 17, 18, 21, X and Y by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in spermatozoa
from nine patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia undergoing
intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod.1999; 14:1266
-1273.
Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif: Duxbury Press; 1995.
Templado C, Hoang T, Greene C, Rademaker A, Chernos J, Martin R. Aneuploid spermatozoa in infertile men: teratozoospermia. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;61:200 -204.[Medline]
Van Opstal D, Los F, Ramlakhan S, et al. Determination of the
parent of origin in nine cases of prenatally detected chromosome aberrations
found after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum
Reprod. 1997;12:682
-686.
Van Steirteghem A, Bonduelle M, Camus M, Liebaers I. Outcomes from intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty, Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. New York: Parthenon Publishing;1999 .
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Sun, M. Mikhaail-Philips, M. Oliver-Bonet, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, P. Turek, and R.H. Martin The relationship between meiotic recombination in human spermatocytes and aneuploidy in sperm Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1691 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sun, M. Mikhaail-Philips, M. Oliver-Bonet, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, P. Turek, and R.H. Martin Reduced meiotic recombination on the XY bivalent is correlated with an increased incidence of sex chromosome aneuploidy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 14(7): 399 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.H. Martin Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Ferguson, E. C. Wong, V. Chow, M. Nigro, and S. Ma Abnormal meiotic recombination in infertile men and its association with sperm aneuploidy Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2007; 16(23): 2870 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Topping, P. Brown, L. Judis, S. Schwartz, A. Seftel, A. Thomas, and T. Hassold Synaptic defects at meiosis I and non-obstructive azoospermia Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3171 - 3177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |