| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the * Department of Urology, Case Western
Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland,
Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and
Pennsylvania State University, Behrend
College, Erie, Pennsylvania.
| Correspondence to: Dr Allen D. Seftel, Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44124 (e-mail: adseftel{at}aol.com). |
| Received for publication March 19, 2002; accepted for publication July 1, 2002. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Prostate cancer, impotence, hypogonadism
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of 82 hypogonadal patients identified, 28 (34.1%) did not meet inclusion criteria. Reasons for exclusion included no recorded PSA level during the testosterone treatment phase in 14 patients, no recorded pretreatment PSA level in 11 patients, no recorded pretreatment testosterone level in 2 patients, and initiation of finasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia during testosterone replacement in 1 patient. Overall, 54 (65.9%) men were included in our analysis.
Patients received intramuscular injections of testosterone cypionate every
2 to 4 weeks. Treatment was initiated at a dose of 200 to 300 mg every 2 to 3
weeks, depending on urologist preference. Dosages were titrated on the basis
of subsequent testosterone levels and clinical efficacy. Follow-up was
measured from the time testosterone supplementation was initiated to the date
of the most recent PSA during therapy. Indications for prostate biopsy while
on testosterone replacement included a newly discovered abnormality on a DRE,
an elevated PSA greater than or equal to 4 ng/mL, and an elevated PSA velocity
(
0.75 ng/mL/y) (Smith and Catalona,
1994). Prostate biopsy was performed by a transrectal ultrasound
guided technique, and at least 4 random core biopsies were taken from each
side of the prostate. The pathology reports were reviewed for the presence of
prostate cancer, the primary endpoint of the study.
Statistical analysis for comparison of pretreatment and post-treatment PSA levels and testosterone levels was performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test for nonnormal distributions. The Mann-Whitney U test and t test were used to compare variables in men requiring prostate biopsy while on testosterone therapy to those not requiring biopsy, with P values less than .05 considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Of the 54 patients, 6 (11.1%) required prostate biopsy. All 6 biopsies were performed because of a rise in serum PSA above 4.0 ng/mL. Overall, prostate cancer was diagnosed in only 1 (1.9%) patient. This patient was a 60-year-old man with a pretreatment PSA of 3.70 ng/mL. After 15 months of testosterone injection therapy, he was found to have a rise in his PSA to 5.90 ng/mL. Subsequently, biopsy was performed, which demonstrated prostate cancer.
The mean pretreatment serum PSA level in the group of 6 patients requiring prostate biopsy during therapy was 5.84 ng/mL (range 0.0-15.80). For the 48 patients not requiring biopsy, mean pretreatment serum PSA level was 1.36 ng/mL (range 0.0-6.23, Table 2). This difference was significant (P < .01). There was no significant difference found for age, duration of therapy, or total testosterone levels between the 2 groups (P > .05).
|
A subset analysis was performed to examine the effects of testosterone replacement on the serum PSA of patients with a minimum of 36 months of consecutive treatment. This subset included 19 of the 54 men (35.2%) with a mean follow-up of 58.5 months (range 38.0-82.0). The mean age of the 19 patients at start of therapy was 61.3 years (range 49.0-71.0). Total testosterone levels increased from a pretreatment mean of 1.84 ng/mL (range 0.60-2.60) to a mean of 9.38 ng/mL (range 2.00-22.20) during therapy (P < .001). Mean pretreatment PSA was 1.07 ng/mL (range 0.0-2.80) and increased to a mean of 1.66 ng/mL (range 0.0-3.80) on androgen replacement (P < .05, Table 3). No patient in this subset required a biopsy, and no patient was diagnosed with prostate cancer.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perhaps of as much concern is the possible causative role of chronic androgen replacement therapy in the development of malignancy from normal prostatic tissue, exemplified by a report of prostate cancer in a 38-year-old bodybuilder who chronically used anabolic steroids over a period of 18 years (Roberts and Essenhigh, 1986). Since eunuchs do not develop prostate cancer, it seems that physiologic amounts of testosterone have at least a permissive role in the development of this malignancy. Nevertheless, prolonged testosterone administration has been shown to induce prostate cancer in a rat model (Noble, 1977) and in a human prostatic epithelial cell line (Wang et al, 2001).
Epidemiologic data also support the possible role of testosterone as a prostatic carcinogen. Caucasian men have a 26 times higher incidence of clinically overt prostate cancer than Chinese men (Yu et al, 1991). This higher risk of prostate cancer is possibly related to differences in androgen metabolism resulting from environmental and dietary factors (Santner et al, 1998).
Despite the theoretical dangers of treating hypogonadal men with testosterone therapy, there are relatively few studies that evaluate the long-term safety of this treatment. The vast majority of prospective and retrospective studies examining this issue report only the short-term effects of testosterone on PSA levels and risk of prostate cancer, with a mean duration of androgen therapy ranging from 2 to 36 months (Tenover, 1992; Holmang et al, 1993; Douglas et al, 1995; Arver et al, 1997; Hajjar et al, 1997; Meikle et al, 1997; Sih et al, 1997; Svetec et al, 1997; Snyder et al, 1999; Guay et al, 2000). Gooren (1994) found no cases of prostate cancer in 33 men between 15 and 62 years of age treated with oral testosterone undecanoate for a minimum of 10 years. However, the majority of patients in this study were under the age of 50 years at start of therapy, and serum PSA changes were not reported. Likewise, Behre et al (1999) evaluated 11 men with a mean age of 35.9 years treated with transscrotal testosterone patches for 7 to 10 years. They found no significant change in PSA levels with treatment, and no patient required prostate biopsy.
The cumulative data from these studies (Table 4) indicate that the unmasking of an occult prostate carcinoma in the immediate period after starting exogenous testosterone is a rare event. However, none of the studies have adequate follow-up in older men to determine if exposing a latent prostate cancer to exogenous testosterone over a relatively longer time frame may induce it into clinically overt cancer. Furthermore, if exogenous testosterone supplementation has a carcinogenic role in the development of cancer from normal tissue, the risk may not become apparent for 5, 10, or even 20 years.
|
Lack of a control group is a limiting factor in the interpretation of our finding of a relatively small rise in PSA of 0.96 ng/mL over a mean duration of therapy of 30.2 months. It is reasonable to speculate that the growth of prostatic tissue that coincides with aging alone is responsible for a significant portion of this rise in PSA. However, it has been demonstrated that prostate volumes increase in hypogonadal men treated with androgen replacement to sizes comparable to those in eugonadal men (Behre et al, 1994) but revert back to smaller sizes after androgen withdrawal (Meikle et al, 1997). Svetec et al (1997) studied 48 hypogonadal men treated with parenteral testosterone replacement. The mean increase in PSA after initiating testosterone therapy was 0.29 ng/mL, with a mean interval between PSA determinations of 12.8 months. Prostate biopsy was performed in 11 men, but all biopsies were benign. Of interest, PSA velocity was measured in this study, and testosterone supplementation did not alter the PSA velocity beyond established normal levels. In a 36-month randomized study, Snyder et al (1999) found a small but statistically significant rise in mean PSA of 0.6 ng/mL in the testosterone treatment arm of 54 men. Prostate biopsy was performed in 4 patients, but cancer was diagnosed in only one. The mean serum PSA concentration did not significantly change in the placebo arm.
Although we recognized the drawback of a retrospective design, our study showed that over a mean follow-up of 30.2 months, there did not appear to be an increased risk of prostate cancer. Despite 6 men requiring biopsy, only 1 patient (1.9%) in our series of 54 men on testosterone therapy developed prostate cancer. A more accurate assessment of the number of men with prostate cancer in this series would be obtained by performing prostate biopsy in all patients. It is possible some men harbor significant malignancies undetectable by standard screening with PSA and DRE. Moreover, the relatively small sample size in this study, similar to the other studies in Table 4, limits the ability to detect small increases in the risk of prostate cancer with testosterone replacement therapy. Since no large-scale, prospective studies are planned to evaluate the risk of prostate cancer with testosterone supplementation, we believe studies like this one add valuable information concerning the safety profile of this therapy.
A significant number of men in our analysis discontinued testosterone therapy within 1 year of treatment secondary to poor clinical results or unwillingness to tolerate drug administration. We therefore performed a subset analysis of 19 men on testosterone replacement for at least 36 consecutive months to assess any longer term effects of therapy on serum PSA levels or the development of prostate cancer. In this subset of patients with a mean follow-up of 58.5 months, no patient was diagnosed with prostate cancer. This subset analysis represents one of the longest follow-up evaluations of a significant number of older hypogonadal men on parenteral testosterone supplementation and suggests that there is likely no increased risk of prostate cancer after 4 to 5 years of continuous therapy.
In summary, parenteral testosterone replacement therapy in older hypogonadal men increased the serum PSA level by a mean of 0.96 ng/mL over a mean treatment duration of 30.2 months. Of 54 men, only one was diagnosed with prostate cancer during therapy. Before initiating treatment, a physician should obtain a mandatory serum PSA level and perform a DRE. Serum PSA levels and DREs are then required at frequent intervals during treatment. Any significant increase in PSA above established normal levels during treatment should be evaluated with prostate biopsy and not be attributed to testosterone therapy. Since no large, well-designed studies exist on men treated with testosterone for longer than 3 years, the long-term risk of prostate cancer secondary to testosterone replacement therapy remains to be determined.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Behre HM, Bohmeyer J, Nieschlag E. Prostate volume in testosterone-treated and untreated hypogonadal men in comparison to age-matched normal controls. Clin Endocrinol.1994; 40:341 -349.[Medline]
Behre HM, Von Eckardstein S, Kliesch S, Nieschlag E. Long-term substitution therapy of hypogonadal men with transscrotal testosterone over 7-10 years. Clin Endocrinol.1999; 50:629 -635.[Medline]
Curran MJ, Bihrle W. Dramatic rise in prostate-specific antigen after androgen replacement in a hypogonadal man with occult adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology.1999; 53:423 -424.[Medline]
Douglas TH, Connelly RR, McLeod DG, Erickson SJ, Barren R, Murphy GP. Effect of exogenous testosterone replacement on prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific membrane antigen levels in hypogonadal men. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:246 -250.[Medline]
Gooren LJ. A ten-year safety study of the oral androgen
testosterone undecanoate. J Androl.1994; 15:212
-215.
Guay AT, Perez JB, Fitaihi WA, Vereb M. Testosterone treatment in hypogonadal men: prostate-specific antigen level and risk of prostate cancer. Endocr Pract.2000; 6:132 -138.[Medline]
Guinan PD, Sadoughi W, Alsheik H, Ablin RJ, Alrenga D, Bush IM. Impotence therapy and cancer of the prostate. Am J Surg. 1976;131:599 -600.[Medline]
Hajjar RR, Kaiser FE, Morley JE. Outcomes of long-term testosterone
replacement in older hypogonadal males: a retrospective analysis. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab.1997; 82:3793
-3796.
Holmang S, Marin P, Lindstedt G, Hedelin H. Effect of long-term oral testosterone undecanoate treatment on prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration in eugonadal middle-aged men. Prostate. 1993;23:99 -106.[Medline]
Huggins C, Hodges C. Studies of prostatic cancer. I. The effect of
castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in
metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res.1941; 1:293
-297.
Jackson JA, Waxman J, Spiekerman M. Prostatic complications of testosterone replacement therapy. Arch Intern Med.1989; 149:2365 -2366.[Abstract]
Loughlin KR, Richie JP. Prostate cancer after exogenous testosterone treatment for impotence. J Urol.1997; 157:1845 .[Medline]
Meikle AW, Arver S, Dobs AS, et al. Prostate size in hypogonadal men treated with a nonscrotal permeation-enhanced testosterone transdermal system. Urology.1997; 49:191 -196.[Medline]
Morgentaler A, Bruning CO, DeWolf WC. Occult prostate cancer in men with low serum testosterone levels. JAMA.1996; 276:1904 -1906.[Abstract]
Muir CS, Nectoux J, Staszewski J. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Geographical distribution and time trends. Acta Oncol. 1991;30:133 -140.[Medline]
Noble RL. Sex steroids as a cause of adenocarcinoma of the dorsal prostate in Nb rats, and their influence on the growth of transplants. Oncology. 1977;34:138 -141.[Medline]
Roberts JT, Essenhigh DM. Adenocarcinoma of prostate in a 40-year-old body-builder. Lancet.1986; 2:742 .
Santner SJ, Albertson B, Zhang GY, et al. Comparative rates of
androgen production and metabolism in Caucasian and Chinese subjects.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1998; 83:2104
-2109.
Sih R, Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM, Patrick P, Ross C.
Testosterone replacement in older hypogonadal men: a 12-month randomized
controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1997; 82:1661
-1667.
Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Rate of change in serum prostate specific antigen levels as a method for prostate cancer detection. J Urol. 1994;152:1163 -1167.[Medline]
Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Hannoush P, et al. Effect of testosterone
treatment on bone mineral density in men over 65 years of age. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab.1999; 84:1966
-1999.
Svetec DA, Canby ED, Thompson IM, Sabanegh ES. The effect of parenteral testosterone replacement on prostate specific antigen in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction. J Urol.1997; 158:1775 -1777.[Medline]
Tenover JS. Effects of testosterone supplementation in the aging male. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1992; 75:1092 -1097.[Abstract]
Thompson IM, Zeidman EJ, Rodriguez FR. Sudden death due to disease flare with luteinizing hormone-releasing agonist therapy for carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol.1990; 144:1479 -1480.[Medline]
Wang Y, Sudilovsky D, Zhang B, et al. A human prostatic epithelial
model of hormonal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res.2001; 61:6064
-6072.
Yu H, Harris RE, Gao YT, Gao R, Wynder EL. Comparative epidemiology
of cancers of the colon, rectum, prostate, and breast in Shanghai, China
versus the United States. Int J Epidemiol.1991; 20:76
-81.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Katz, A. Katz, and C. Burchill Androgen therapy: Testing before prescribing and monitoring during therapy Can Fam Physician, November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1936 - 1942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wald, R. B. Meacham, L. S. Ross, and C. S. Niederberger Testosterone Replacement Therapy for Older Men J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 126 - 132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |