| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Perspectives and Editorials |
Schrader SM, Breitenstein MJ, Clark JC, Lowe BD, Turner
TW. Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity testing of bicycle patrol
officers. J Androl.2002
;23:927934.
Dr Goldstein's supportive commentary is appreciated. While we concur with Dr Goldstein that narrow saddles with protruding "noses" appear to result in greater pressure on the perineum, more research is needed before definitive statements can be made regarding the relative risk of impaired sexual function attributable to the use of specific saddle designs. However, the myriad number of new bicycle saddle designs available to cyclists suggests that saddle manufacturers are aware of problems with the traditional bicycle saddle design.
Dr Brock's primary criticism of our study appears to stem from the self-selective nature of our participant recruitment, which he indicates may exaggerate the prevalence of ED among general cyclists. This criticism is unwarranted, because our study focused on a specific occupational group, a bicycle police patrol unit, and the study was not intended to make inferences regarding the prevalence of ED in the general cycling population. In addition, we believe correlations between both time in the saddle and saddle nose pressure with the percentage of sleep time with an erection would not be exaggerated by participant self-selection. We believe that the relationship between bicycle saddle usage and male sexual function is mediated by a host of variables that include the weight and anthropometrics of the cyclist, the saddle design and cushion material properties, the geometry of the bicycle and its fit to the cyclist, the type of cycling, etc. We concur with Dr Brock that large randomized cohort studies are needed to examine the influence of these variables on ED.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |