Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Auroux, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by David, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Auroux, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by David, G.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 9, Issue 3 153-159, Copyright © 1988 by The American Society of Andrology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Antimitotic drugs in the male rat. Behavioral abnormalities in the second generation

M. R. Auroux, E. J. Dulioust, N. N. Nawar, S. G. Yacoub, M. J. Mayaux, D. Schwartz and G. David
Laboratoire d'Histologie-Embryologie-Cytogenetique, Cedex, France.

The second generation descended from rats treated either with cyclophosphamide alone or with both cyclophosphamide and vinblastine were investigated. As in the first generation, the offspring were evaluated for mean litter size, sex ratio, frequency of gross external malformations and, within the first 4 months of life, growth and mortality. When they reached adulthood, between 12 and 16 weeks of age, the offspring were also tested for spontaneous activity and learning capacity. At birth, the progeny of the treated grandfathers did not show malformations or any other obvious disorder. However, when compared with the control population, the experimental animals showed significantly decreased success rates in a learning task, whatever the learning performance of their parents. Furthermore, decreased spontaneous activity was observed in the male subjects from unsuccessful parents. The similarities between the anomalies found in the first and the second generations argue for the induction of mutations by antimitotic drugs. This hypothesis and the subtle differences between generations and between sexes are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Barber, M. A. Plumb, E. Boulton, I. Roux, and Y. E. Dubrova
Elevated mutation rates in the germ line of first- and second-generation offspring of irradiated male mice
PNAS, May 1, 2002; (2002) 102015399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society of Andrology.