| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

From the * Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology
Laboratory and the
Department of Statistics,
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
| Correspondence to: Dr Rupert P. Amann, 909 Centre Ave, #123, Ft Collins, CO 80526-2091 (e-mail: rpalra62{at}comcast.net). |
We retrospectively mined and modeled data to answer 3 questions. 1)
Relative to an estimate based on
20 semen samples, how imprecise is an
estimate of an individual's total sperm per ejaculate (TSperm) based on 1
sample? 2) What is the impact of abstinence interval on TSperm and TSperm/h?
3) How many samples are needed to provide a meaningful estimate of an
individual's mean TSperm or TSperm/h? Data were for 18–20 consecutive
masturbation samples from each of 48 semen donors. Modeling exploited the
gamma distribution of values for TSperm and a unique approach to project to
future samples. Answers: 1) Within-individual coefficients of variation were
similar for TSperm or TSperm/h abstinence and ranged from 17% to 51%; average
34%. TSperm or TSperm/h in any individual sample from a given donor was
between –20% and +20% of the mean value in 48% of 18–20 samples
per individual. 2) For a majority of individuals, TSperm increased in a nearly
linear manner through
72 hours of abstinence. TSperm and TSperm/h after
18–36 hours' abstinence are high. To obtain meaningful values for
diagnostic purposes and maximize distinction of individuals with relatively
low or high sperm production, the requested abstinence should be 42–54
hours with an upper limit of 64 hours. For individuals producing few sperm, 7
days or more of abstinence might be appropriate to obtain sperm for
insemination. 3) At least 3 samples from a hypothetical future subject are
recommended for most applications. Assuming 60 hours' abstinence, 80%
confidence limits for TSperm/h for 1, 3, or 6 samples would be 70%–163%,
80%–130%, or 85%–120% of the mean for observed values. In only
50% of cases would TSperm/h for a single sample be within –16% and
+30% of the true mean value for that subject. Conclusions: Pooling values for
TSperm in samples obtained after 18–36 or 72–168 hours' abstinence
with values for TSperm obtained after 42–64 hours is inappropriate.
Reliance on TSperm for a single sample per subject is unwise.
Key words: Imprecision of total sperm per ejaculate, abstinence interval, meaningful semen data, noninvasive evaluation of spermatogenesis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R.P. Amann Evaluating testis function non-invasively: how epidemiologist-andrologist teams might better approach this task Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2010; 25(1): 22 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Amann Evaluating Spermatogenesis Using Semen: The Biology of Emission Tells Why Reporting Total Sperm per Sample Is Important, and Why Reporting Only Number of Sperm per Milliliter Is Irrational J Androl, November 1, 2009; 30(6): 623 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Amann Considerations in Evaluating Human Spermatogenesis on the Basis of Total Sperm per Ejaculate J Androl, November 1, 2009; 30(6): 626 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |