Journal of Andrology Testis Workshop 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print May 14, 2009, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.108.006817
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 30, No. 6, November/December 2009
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.108.006817

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/6/626    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R. P.

Review

Considerations in Evaluating Human Spermatogenesis on the Basis of Total Sperm per Ejaculate

RUPERT P. AMANN

From the Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Correspondence to: Dr Rupert P. Amann, 909 Centre Ave, #123, Fort Collins, CO 80526-2091 (e-mail: rpalra62{at}comcast.net).



Abstract

Total number of sperm per ejaculate (TSperm) is an important measure for clinicians to provide advice to patient couples. However, TSperm per hour of abstinence (TSperm/h) is a better measure for epidemiologist-andrologist teams or clinicians to evaluate spermatogenesis because it is a rate function. This review looks at the interplay and impacts of rate of sperm accumulation in the excurrent duct system, abstinence interval, sexual arousal, and masturbation vs intercourse on observed TSperm. It also examines why and when TSperm/h might provide a meaningful quantitative evaluation of spermatogenesis (ie, rate of sperm production). There is no doubt that TSperm increases with longer abstinence, and in different men plateaus after 2–9 days. Clinicians wishing to maximize number of fully functional sperm available during intercourse, or for artificial insemination, might wish to recommend 6–7 days of abstinence. Diagnostically, the important feature is TSperm/h. After abstinence interval exceeds 64–72 hours, TSperm/h has started to decline in most nonoligozoospermic men as rate of sperm accumulation in the excurrent ducts approaches zero; apparently increasingly more sperm are voided in urine. Clinicians or epidemiologist-andrologist teams wishing to have optimal distinction among individuals with high, typical, or low sperm production (ie, normal or abnormal spermatogenesis) should accurately measure TSperm/h for samples provided after 42–54 hours' abstinence (never ≤36 or >64 hours). Longer abstinence intervals reward men with poor sperm production, because sperm accumulate in the excurrent ducts for 7 days or more of abstinence, and penalize men with good sperm production, because after 3 days or less of abstinence their excurrent ducts probably are full.

     Key words: Evaluating spermatogenesis, total sperm per hour of abstinence, abstinence interval, excurrent ducts, sexual arousal




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.P. Amann
Evaluating testis function non-invasively: how epidemiologist-andrologist teams might better approach this task
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2010; 25(1): 22 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. P. Amann
Evaluating Spermatogenesis Using Semen: The Biology of Emission Tells Why Reporting Total Sperm per Sample Is Important, and Why Reporting Only Number of Sperm per Milliliter Is Irrational
J Androl, November 1, 2009; 30(6): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of Andrology.