Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print April 2, 2009, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.108.006296
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 30, No. 5, September/October 2009
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.108.006296

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/5/602    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kornmann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Von Eckardstein, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kornmann, B.
Right arrow Articles by Von Eckardstein, S.

Body Fat Content and Testosterone Pharmacokinetics Determine Gonadotropin Suppression After Intramuscular Injections of Testosterone Preparations in Normal Men

BRITTA KORNMANN, EBERHARD NIESCHLAG, MICHAEL ZITZMANN, JöRG GROMOLL, MANUELA SIMONI AND SIGRID VON ECKARDSTEIN*

From the Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology of the University, Münster, Germany.
* Present address: Hornhaldenstr. 31 8802 Kilchberg, Switzerland.

Correspondence to: Prof Dr med Eberhard Nieschlag, Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology of the University, Domagkstr. 11, D-48129 Münster, Germany (e-mail: eberhard.nieschlag{at}ukmuenster.de).



Abstract

Interindividual differences in gonadotropin suppression achieved by short- and long-acting intramuscular testosterone (T) preparations were studied to detect factors hindering complete suppression of gonadotropins as the prerequisites for effective male contraception. Forty healthy men received a single injection of T propionate; 4 weeks later they received 2 injections of 1000 mg of T undecanoate (TU) given 6 weeks apart. Following TU, declines of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were consistent in 17.5% and almost absent in 25% of men. Men showing the most rapid and consistent declines in LH and FSH levels received a slightly higher dose per body weight of TU (13.1 ± 0.6 vs 11.3 ± 0.6 mg/kg; P = NS) and reached higher maximal concentrations of total T (40 ± 4.8 vs 18.4 ± 2.4 nmol/L; P < .001) and free T as well as estradiol. Men with high fat mass (mean ± SEM, 10.3 ± 1.5 vs 23.2 ± 6.4 kg) had a delayed increase in T levels and an impaired relative decline in LH (12 ± 2% vs 53 ± 10%) and FSH (17 ± 6%. vs 70 ± 25%) levels within the first 2 weeks after the first TU injection. We conclude that overweight reduces the chance of rapid and profound gonadotropin suppression during treatment with TU. Body weight needs to be considered to avoid failure of hormonal male contraception.

     Key words: Negative feedback, body weight







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of Andrology.