| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,








From the * Laboratoire de
Biogénotoxicologie et Mutagenèse Environnementale,
Fédération de Recherche ECCOREV, Faculté de
Médecine, Marseille, France; the
Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de
Médecine et Santé au Travail, AP-HM et Faculté de
Médecine, Marseille, France; the
Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction,
AP-HM–La Conception, Marseille, France; and the
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de
Biostatistique, Lyon, France; the
Université de Lyon,
Villeurbanne, France; and the
Laboratoire Biostatistique Santé,
Pierre-Bénite, France.
| Correspondence to: Dr Jeanne Perrin, Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille–CHU La Conception, 147, Bd. Baille, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France (e-mail: jeanne.perrin{at}ap-hm.fr). |
In industrial countries, evidence suggests that semen quality has been
steadily decreasing over the past 5 decades. We employed a short questionnaire
to examine the association between self-reported physical or chemical
occupational exposures and semen quality. The study included 402 men
consulting for couple infertility (314 with oligospermia, asthenospermia, or
teratospermia and 88 with normal semen; World Health Organization criteria).
Exposure effects on global sperm quality and total sperm count, sperm
motility, and sperm morphology were investigated. We found significant
associations between semen impairment and occupational risk factors such as
exposure to heavy metals (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.4; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 1.6–18.1), solvents (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.4),
fumes (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1–3.4), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5). Exposure to pesticides or cement was nearly
significant (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 0.8–15.8, and OR = 2.5; 95% CI,
0.95–6.5, respectively). Physical risk factors were associated with some
sperm anomalies, such as mechanical vibrations with oligospermia and
teratospermia as well as excess heat and extended sitting periods with
impaired motility. Exposure to ionizing radiation and electromagnetic fields
was not associated with semen impairment; these results, however, may be
skewed, because very few subjects reported such exposure. Despite the small
dataset, self-reported exposures were correlated with semen impairment. This
approach may be recommended in routine clinical practice to seek relationships
between occupational exposures to reprotoxic agents and impaired semen
parameters. This knowledge would allow preventive measures in the workplace to
be established and could be complemented by the use of biomarkers to better
characterize exposure to chemical substances and their spermiotoxic
effects.
Key words: Semen, male infertility, occupational exposure, questionnaire, self-reported exposures
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Do Occupational Exposures Affect Semen Quality? Journal Watch (General), September 29, 2009; 2009(929): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |