This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 30/2/200    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hamzeh, M. Articles by Robaire, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hamzeh, M. Articles by Robaire, B.

Effect of Testosterone on Epithelial Cell Proliferation in the Regressed Rat Epididymis

BERNARD ROBAIRE^*,

From the Departments of ^* Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Correspondence to: Dr Bernard Robaire, McIntyre Medical Sciences Building, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 104, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1Y6 (e-mail: bernard.robaire{at}mcgill.ca).

It is well established that testosterone plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of epididymal structure and function. However, the role of testosterone in restoring the cellular architecture of the regressed epididymis is not well known. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that testosterone triggers the regressed epididymis by re-expanding existing cells and inducing cell proliferation. Testosterone-dependent epididymal morphology was evaluated in orchidectomized, regressed rats after initiation of treatment with testosterone. Besides that, the proliferative activity of epithelial cells in all regions of the epididymis of the orchidectomized, regressed rats was assessed at 1, 3, 7, and 28 days after testosterone replacement. Epithelial cell proliferation decreased after testosterone withdrawal and increased following testosterone administration. We found that bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and proliferating nuclear antigen expression increased significantly 3 days after testosterone replacement in all regions of the regressed epididymis except in the initial segment. The highest mitotic activity was seen in the corpus epididymidis at 3 days postimplantation. Using specific markers for each cell type, we found no significant changes in the proportion of each cell type compared with the control. We observed labeled nuclei in all epithelial cell types in the control; however, principal cells were the major cell types that responded to testosterone after regression. These observations demonstrate that the mammalian epididymis is not a static tissue without any significant cell renewal, either under control conditions or when androgen exposure is altered, thus providing new insight in the role of androgen in restoration and maintenance of the architecture of the epididymis.

     Key words: Orchidectomy, regression, cell division

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Robaire and M. Hamzeh Androgen Action in the Epididymis J Androl, November 1, 2011; 32(6): 592 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Hinton, M. M. Galdamez, A. Sutherland, D. Bomgardner, B. Xu, R. Abdel-Fattah, and L. Yang How Do You Get Six Meters of Epididymis Inside a Human Scrotum? J Androl, November 1, 2011; 32(6): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Krutskikh, K. De Gendt, V. Sharp, G. Verhoeven, M. Poutanen, and I. Huhtaniemi Targeted Inactivation of the Androgen Receptor Gene in Murine Proximal Epididymis Causes Epithelial Hypotrophy and Obstructive Azoospermia Endocrinology, February 1, 2011; 152(2): 689 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]