This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 29/5/469    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Amann, R. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Amann, R. P.

Review

The Cycle of the Seminiferous Epithelium in Humans: A Need to Revisit?

From the Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Correspondence to: Rupert P. Amann, 909 Centre Ave, No. 123, Fort Collins, CO 80526 (e-mail: rpalra62{at}comcast.net).

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of spermatogenesis is central to clinical andrology or to probing environmental effects on human testes. This review considers what is known about renewal and proliferation of spermatogonia, how germ cells are organized in cellular associations constituting the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium, relative frequencies of cellular associations, durations of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and spermatogenesis, and measurement of daily sperm production. Daily sperm production (DSP) per testis tends to decline with advancing age. Regardless of age, there is substantial loss of potential sperm from degeneration of spermatocytes, but not spermatids. DSP per gram testis parenchyma or DSP per testis cannot be predicted on the basis of testis size or age of a man. The review shows why our 1960s data base is neither robust nor precise and suggests how deficiencies might be rectified. New cellular associations should be defined, with none representing >15% of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Then determine when A_pale-spermatogonia become committed to proliferate or how many mitotic divisions occur thereafter. Restudy the duration of spermatogenesis because the accepted value might be in error by 6 days. Restudying human spermatogenesis will benefit clinicians, toxicologists, and epidemiologists probing testis function by direct evaluations or indirectly via evaluations of quantity and quality of sperm ejaculated. It also will benefit scientists interested in renewal and proliferation of spermatogonia, or a spermatogonium as a prototype stem cell.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. P Hermann, M. Sukhwani, M. C Hansel, and K. E Orwig Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents? Reproduction, March 1, 2010; 139(3): 479 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Sato, S. Nozawa, M. Yoshiike, M. Arai, C. Sasaki, and T. Iwamoto Xenografting of testicular tissue from an infant human donor results in accelerated testicular maturation Hum. Reprod., February 19, 2010; (2010) deq001v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Amann Considerations in Evaluating Human Spermatogenesis on the Basis of Total Sperm per Ejaculate J Androl, November 1, 2009; 30(6): 626 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Unni, D. N. Modi, S. G. Pathak, J. V. Dhabalia, and D. Bhartiya Stage-specific Localization and Expression of c-kit in the Adult Human Testis J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2009; 57(9): 861 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhou, D. Qin, A. Tang, D. Zhou, J. Qin, B. Yan, R. Diao, Z. Jiang, Z. Cai, and Y. Gui Developmental expression pattern of a novel gene, TSG23/Tsg23, suggests a role in spermatogenesis Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 15(4): 223 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]