Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published-Ahead-of-Print December 12, 2007, DOI:10.2164/jandrol.107.003632
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 29, No. 2, March/April 2008
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.107.003632

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/134    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Said, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paasch, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Said, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paasch, U.


Andrology Lab Corner*

Utility of Magnetic Cell Separation as a Molecular Sperm Preparation Technique

TAMER M. SAID*, ASHOK AGARWAL{dagger}, MACIEJ ZBOROWSKI{ddagger}, SONJA GRUNEWALD§, HANS-JUERGEN GLANDER§ AND UWE PAASCH§

From the * Department of Andrology and Reproductive Tissue Banking, The Toronto Institute for Reproductive Medicine (ReproMed), Toronto, Canada; the {dagger} Center for Advanced Research in Human Reproduction, Infertility, and Sexual Function, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and the {ddagger} Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and the § Department of Dermatology and Andrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Correspondence to: Prof Dr Uwe Paasch, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, European Training Center of the European Academy of Andrology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (e-mail: uwe.paasch{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de).



Abstract

Assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) have become the treatment of choice in many cases of infertility; however, the current success rates of these procedures remain suboptimal. Programmed cell death (apoptosis) most likely contributes to failed ART and to the decrease in sperm quality after cryopreservation. There is a likelihood that some sperm selected for ART will display features of apoptosis despite their normal appearance, which may be partially responsible for the low fertilization and implantation rates seen with ART. One of the features of apoptosis is the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS) residues, which are normally present on the inner leaflet of the sperm plasma membrane. Colloidal superparamagnetic microbeads (~50 nm in diameter) conjugated with annexin V bind to PS and are used to separate dead and apoptotic spermatozoa by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS). Cells with externalized PS will bind to these microbeads, whereas nonapoptotic cells with intact membranes do not bind and could be used during ARTs. We have conducted a series of experiments to investigate whether the MACS technology could be used to improve ART outcomes. Our results clearly indicate that integrating MACS as a part of sperm preparation techniques will improve semen quality and cryosurvival rates by eliminating apoptotic sperm. Nonapoptotic spermatozoa prepared by MACS display higher quality in terms of routine sperm parameters and apoptosis markers. The higher sperm quality is represented by an increased oocyte penetration potential and cryosurvival rates. Thus, the selection of nonapoptotic spermatozoa by MACS should be considered to enhance ART success rates.

     Key words: Annexin V, apoptosis, cryopreservation, human, MACS, male infertility




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Leahy and B. M. Gadella
Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage
Reproduction, December 1, 2011; 142(6): 759 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
T. M. Said and J. A. Land
Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2011; 17(6): 719 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.D. Fleming, R.S. Ilad, A-M.G. Griffin, Y. Wu, K.J. Ong, H.C. Smith, and R.J. Aitken
Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2646 - 2651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Andrology.