This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 27/6/785    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rajender, S. Articles by Thangaraj, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rajender, S. Articles by Thangaraj, K.

No Association of Androgen Receptor GGN Repeat Length Polymorphism With Infertility in Indian Men

NALINI J. GUPTA

BAIDYANATH CHAKRAVARTY

From the ^* Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, India; and the Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India.

Correspondence to: Dr. K. Thangaraj, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500 007, India (e-mail: thangs{at}ccmb.res.in).

Androgens, acting through the androgen receptor (AR), play a role in secondary sexual differentiation from the prenatal stage to adulthood, including spermatogenesis. The AR gene has 2 polymorphic trinucleotide repeats (CAG and GGN) in exon 1. The CAG repeat length polymorphism has been well studied in a variety of medical conditions, including male infertility. Many of these studies have shown an association of the expanded CAG repeats with male infertility, although this is not true for all populations. The GGN repeat, in contrast, has been less thoroughly studied. Thus far, only 4 reports worldwide have analyzed the GGN repeat, alone or in combination with the CAG repeat, in male infertility cases. No such study has been undertaken on infertile Indian men. Therefore, we have analyzed AR-GGN repeats in a total of 595 Indian males, including 277 azoospemric, 97 oligozoospermic, and 21 oligoteratozoospermic cases, along with 200 normozoospermic controls. The analysis revealed no difference in the mean number or the range of the repeat between cases (mean = 21.51 repeats, range 15–26 repeats) and controls (mean 21.58 repeats, range 15–26 repeats). Furthermore, no difference was observed when azoospermic (mean = 21.53 repeats, range 15–26 repeats), oligozoospermic (mean = 21.46 repeats, range 15–26 repeats), and oligoteratozoospermic cases (mean = 21.48, range 19–26 repeats) were compared individually with the controls.

     Key words: Androgen receptor, GGN repeat, male infertility, semen abnormality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Parada-Bustamante, M. C. Lardone, R. Valdevenito, M. Ebensperger, P. V. Lopez, M. Madariaga, A. Piottante, and A. Castro Analysis of 6 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Androgen Receptor Gene in Chilean Patients With Primary Spermatogenic Failure J Androl, January 1, 2012; 33(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Welzel, H. P. Schwarz, J. Hedderich, H. G. Dorr, G. Binder, J. H. Bramswig, H. Krude, A. Richter-Unruh, M. Niedziela, J. Gromoll, et al. No Correlation between Androgen Receptor CAG and GGN Repeat Length and the Degree of Genital Virilization in Females with 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2010; 95(5): 2443 - 2450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Badran, I. Fahmy, W. M. Abdel-Megid, K. Elder, R. Mansour, and M. Kent-First Length of Androgen Receptor-CAG Repeats in Fertile and Infertile Egyptian Men J Androl, July 1, 2009; 30(4): 416 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Page, J. K. Amory, and W. J. Bremner Advances in Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Davis-Dao, E. D. Tuazon, R. Z. Sokol, and V. K. Cortessis Male Infertility and Variation in CAG Repeat Length in the Androgen Receptor Gene: A Meta-analysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4319 - 4326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Marietta Clewing, B. C Antalfy, T. Lucke, B. Najafian, K. M Marwedel, A. Hori, R. M Powel, A F Safo Do, L. Najera, K. SantaCruz, et al. Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia: a clinicopathological correlation J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2007; 44(2): 122 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]