This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 27/4/534    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moura, A. A. Articles by Killian, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moura, A. A. Articles by Killian, G. J.

Journal of Andrology, Vol. 27, No. 4, July/August 2006
Copyright © American Society of Andrology

Proteins of the Cauda Epididymal Fluid Associated With Fertility of Mature Dairy Bulls

HASAN KOC

From the ^* J. O. Almquist Research Center, Department of Dairy and Animal Science, and The Huck Institute of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Correspondence to: Dr Gary J. Killian, J. O. Almquist Research Center, Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (e-mail: lwj{at}psu.edu).

We evaluated the relationships between proteins in cauda epididymis fluid (CEF) and fertility scores of dairy bulls. Fertility was expressed as the percentage point deviation (PD) of bull nonreturn rate from the average fertility of all bulls at an artificial insemination center. The number of services for each bull ranged from 1074 to 52 820, and PD values ranged from +7.7% to -6.6%. CEF from 20 bulls was obtained from vasa deferentia cannulae and was separated from sperm by centrifugation immediately after collection. Samples were evaluated by 2-dimensional (2-D) sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels stained with Coomassie blue, and polypeptide maps were analyzed by PDQuest software. Protein quantities, defined as the total integrated optical density of the spots, were compared between groups of high-fertility sires (n = 12; PD 0) and low-fertility sires (n = 8; PD < 0) and were also used as independent variables in regression analysis. Proteins were identified by capillary liquid chromatography–nanoelectrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry. An average of 118 spots was detected in 2-D maps of the CEF, but we were unable to distinguish any protein that was expressed only in high-fertility or in low-fertility bulls. However, the amount of -L-fucosidase 2 and cathepsin D was 2.3- and 2.4-fold greater (P < .05) in high-fertility than in low-fertility bulls, respectively. Conversely, the intensities of 3 isoforms (24–27 kd; pl 6.3–5.8) of prostaglandin D-synthase (PGDS) were from 3.2- to 2.2-fold greater in low-fertility sires (P < .05). An empirical regression model established that a significant proportion (R² = 0.72; P < .0001) of the variation in fertility scores (PD values) was explained by the intensities of cathepsin D and 1 isoform of PGDS (24 kd; pl 6.3). Thus, multiple proteins present in the CEF are potential biomarkers of fertility in high-use, mature Holstein bulls.

     Key words: -L-fucosidase, cathepsin D, epididymis, mass spectrometry, prostaglandin D-synthase, sperm

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Lefievre, K. Bedu-Addo, S. J Conner, G. S M Machado-Oliveira, Y. Chen, J. C Kirkman-Brown, M. A Afnan, S. J Publicover, W C. L Ford, and C. L R Barratt Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation? Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]