Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carvajal, G.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carvajal, G.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, J.
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 25, No. 3, May/June 2004
Copyright © American Society of Andrology

Effects of Centrifugation Before Freezing on Boar Sperm Cryosurvival

GEMA CARVAJAL, CRISTINA CUELLO, MARIA RUIZ, JUAN MARÍA VÁZQUEZ, EMILIO ARSENIO MARTÍNEZ AND JORDI ROCA

From the Department of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Campus de Espinardo, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Correspondence to: Dr Jordi Roca, Department of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Campus de Espinardo, University of Murcia, E-30071 Murcia, Spain (e-mail: roca{at}um.es).


Current protocols for boar sperm cryopreservation require the centrifugation of semen in order to separate sperm cells from the seminal plasma. This study evaluated the influence of different centrifugation regimes on both sperm recovery and yield (percentage of viable sperm with an intact acrosome relative to the initial sperm population) after centrifugation (experiment 1) as well as the influence of different centrifugation regimes on boar sperm cryosurvival (experiment 2). In both experiments, sperm-rich fractions from 3 boars were diluted, pooled, and cooled to 17°C before centrifugation. In experiment 1, the g-forces tested were 400, 800, 1600, and 2400 x g for 3 or 5 minutes, using the standard regime (800 x g for 10 minutes) as a reference. Sperm recovery (Bürker Chamber) and yield (triple fluorescent stain of PI/R123/FITC-PNA [DNA-specific fluorochrome propidium iodide/mitochondria-specific fluorochrome rhodamine-123/acrosome-specific fluorochrome fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled peanut (Arachis hypogaea) agglutinin]) were calculated. The highest recovery and yield (P < .05) values were achieved using 2400 x g for 5 or 3 minutes and 1600 x g for 5 minutes, which showed no differences (P > .05) from the reference in terms of sperm yield. In experiment 2, cooled semen was centrifuged using 3 different regimes: C1 (2400 x g for 3 minutes), C2 (1600 x g for 5 minutes), and C3 (800 x g for 10 minutes). Pellets were diluted in lactose-egg yolk (LEY)-glycerol-Equex STM (1 x 109 cells/mL) and frozen in 0.5-mL straws. After thawing, sperm quality was assessed after 30 and 150 minutes of incubation (37°C). Centrifugation regimes C1 and C2 showed significantly (P < .05) higher postthaw sperm motility (assessed with a computer-assisted semen analysis system), viability (evaluated as for experiment 1), and percentage of uncapacitated sperm (assessed with a chlortetracycline assay) than did C3. In addition, C1 had the highest (P < .05) oocyte penetrating ability (assessed with the homologous in vitro penetration test performed with immature oocytes). Malondialdehyde production, assessed with the thiobarbituric acid reactive species test, was unaffected (P > .05) by the centrifugation regime used. We conclude that high g-force (2400 x g) and short centrifugation time (3 minutes) do not affect sperm recovery and yield and that, moreover, they have a positive effect on the cryosurvival of boar sperm. Therefore, we recommend the use of short-term centrifugation with a relatively high g-force (2400 x g for 3 minutes) in boar sperm cryopreservation protocol.

     Key words: Cryopreservation, g-force, frozen-thawed sperm, semen quality




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Hernandez, J. Roca, J. J. Calvete, L. Sanz, T. Muino-Blanco, J. A. Cebrian-Perez, J. M. Vazquez, and E. A. Martinez
Cryosurvival and In Vitro Fertilizing Capacity Postthaw Is Improved When Boar Spermatozoa Are Frozen in the Presence of Seminal Plasma From Good Freezer Boars
J Androl, September 1, 2007; 28(5): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S Sancho, I Casas, H Ekwall, F Saravia, H Rodriguez-Martinez, J E Rodriguez-Gil, E Flores, E Pinart, M Briz, N Garcia-Gil, et al.
Effects of cryopreservation on semen quality and the expression of sperm membrane hexose transporters in the spermatozoa of Iberian pigs
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Roca, M. Hernandez, G. Carvajal, J. M. Vazquez, and E. A. Martinez
Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2692 - 2699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
T. Cremades, J. Roca, H. Rodriguez-Martinez, T. Abaigar, J. M. Vazquez, and E. A. Martinez
Kinematic Changes During the Cryopreservation of Boar Spermatozoa
J Androl, September 1, 2005; 26(5): 610 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society of Andrology.