This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van der Avoort, I. A.M. Articles by Kremer, J. A.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van der Avoort, I. A.M. Articles by Kremer, J. A.M.

Underestimation of Subfertility Among Relatives When Using a Family History: Taboo Bias

IRENE A.M. VAN DER AVOORT^*,

JOEP H.A.M. TUERLINGS

LAMBERTUS A. KIEMENEY^,

ERIC J.H. MEULEMAN

From the Departments of ^* Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Human Genetics, and Urology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to: Dr J.A.M. Kremer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (e-mail: j.kremer{at}obgyn.umcn.nl).

Family history is widely used in clinical practice and research in order to study genetic aspects of disorders in general, and is recommended as a tool in the assessment of male subfertility. Unfortunately, little is known about the validity of this tool. In this survey, we sent questionnaires to 474 randomly selected men aged 25–40 years in order to collect data on subfertility among them and their relatives. A nonresponder study was also conducted in order to evaluate selection bias. A personal interview was also performed with some respondents in order to gauge how well the data corresponded with questionnaires that were returned. Two hundred forty-three men (51.3%) completed the questionnaire. The responders reported a significantly lower prevalence of subfertility among their relatives than among themselves. Among brothers, the reported prevalence was about 5 times lower (ie, 3.6%) than among responders (15.3%). The nonresponder study and personal interviews showed that these differences were not caused by a selective response to the survey or by the use of a questionnaire instead of a personal interview. We conclude that subfertility among relatives is severely underestimated through the use of family history, probably because of the taboo of discussing subfertility. Knowledge of subfertility may spread selectively within families, causing substantial misclassification. Therefore, researchers and clinicians should be aware that an inquiry of family history is likely to lead to underestimation of subfertility among relatives.

     Key words: Epidemiology, misclassification, accuracy, fertility, genetics, familial occurrence

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. T. van Golde, I. A. M. van der Avoort, J. H. A. M. Tuerlings, L. A. Kiemeney, E. J. H. Meuleman, D. D. M. Braat, and J. A. M. Kremer Phenotypic Characteristics of Male Subfertility and Its Familial Occurrence J Androl, September 1, 2004; 25(5): 819 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Aittomaki, U.-B. Wennerholm, C. Bergh, A. Selbing, J. Hazekamp, and K.-G. Nygren Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: Should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 472 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]