Journal of Andrology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sailer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evenson, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sailer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Evenson, D. P.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 16, Issue 1 80-87, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Andrology

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay

B. L. Sailer, L. K. Jost and D. P. Evenson
South Dakota State University, Olson Biochemistry Laboratories, Brookings, USA.

Sperm from four mammalian species were analyzed by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay (TdTA) using flow cytometry. The SCSA quantitates the susceptibility of sperm nuclear DNA to in situ acid denaturation, while the TdTA quantitates the presence of endogenous DNA strand breaks in sperm nuclear chromatin. Correlations were seen between the percentage of sperm cells showing susceptibility to in situ acid denaturation and the percentage of cells showing the presence of DNA strand breaks for humans (r = 0.56, P = 0.004), rams (r = 0.84, P < 0.001), bulls (r = 0.78, P < 0.001), and stallions (r = 0.65, P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen when using fresh or frozen samples for either assay. These results suggest that sperm cells that are more susceptible to in situ DNA denaturation may have a greater number of accessible endogenous DNA strand breaks. We hypothesize that the DNA strand breaks produced in the normal transition from a somatic cell histone complex to a protamine complex are not ligated properly, resulting in residual DNA strand breaks and altered chromatin structure. Alternatively, altered chromatin structure could lead to the accessibility of the endogenous DNA strand breaks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. T. Carrell, B. R. Emery, and S. Hammoud
Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link?
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 313 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A.M. Codrington, B.F. Hales, and B. Robaire
Exposure of male rats to cyclophosphamide alters the chromatin structure and basic proteome in spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1431 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Singleton, A. Zalensky, G.F. Doncel, M. Morshedi, and I.A. Zalenskaya
Testis/sperm-specific histone 2B in the sperm of donors and subfertile patients: variability and relation to chromatin packaging
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 743 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Borini, N. Tarozzi, D. Bizzaro, M.A. Bonu, L. Fava, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio
Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2876 - 2881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
A. A. Makhlouf and C. Niederberger
DNA Integrity Tests in Clinical Practice: It Is Not a Simple Matter of Black and White (or Red and Green)
J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 316 - 323.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
L. Muriel, M. Meseguer, J. L. Fernandez, J. Alvarez, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and N. Garrido
Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 738 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
A. N. Fatehi, M. M. Bevers, E. Schoevers, B. A. J. Roelen, B. Colenbrander, and B. M. Gadella
DNA Damage in Bovine Sperm Does Not Block Fertilization and Early Embryonic Development But Induces Apoptosis After the First Cleavages
J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 176 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
D. Evenson
Reply to: 'The predictive value of the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)'--a response from the SCSA inventor.
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 570 - 572.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
K. R. Chohan, J. T. Griffin, M. Lafromboise, C. J. De Jonge, and D. T. Carrell
Comparison of Chromatin Assays for DNA Fragmentation Evaluation in Human Sperm
J Androl, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sergerie, G. Laforest, L. Bujan, F. Bissonnette, and G. Bleau
Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male fertility
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3446 - 3451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
R.-M. Laberge and G. Boissonneault
On the Nature and Origin of DNA Strand Breaks in Elongating Spermatids
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2005; 73(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. Seli and D. Sakkas
Spermatozoal nuclear determinants of reproductive outcome: implications for ART
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2005; 11(4): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
G. B. Boe-Hansen, A. K. Ersboll, and P. Christensen
Variability and Laboratory Factors Affecting the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay in Human Semen
J Androl, May 1, 2005; 26(3): 360 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
U. Paasch, R. K. Sharma, A. K. Gupta, S. Grunewald, E. J. Mascha, A. J. Thomas Jr, H.-J. Glander, and A. Agarwal
Cryopreservation and Thawing Is Associated with Varying Extent of Activation of Apoptotic Machinery in Subsets of Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 1828 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
A. M. Codrington, B. F. Hales, and B. Robaire
Spermiogenic Germ Cell Phase-Specific DNA Damage Following Cyclophosphamide Exposure
J Androl, May 1, 2004; 25(3): 354 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
S. I. Peris, A. Morrier, M. Dufour, and J. L. Bailey
Cryopreservation of Ram Semen Facilitates Sperm DNA Damage: Relationship Between Sperm Andrological Parameters and the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay
J Androl, March 1, 2004; 25(2): 224 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. H. Moustafa, R. K. Sharma, J. Thornton, E. Mascha, M. A. Abdel-Hafez, A. J. Thomas, and A. Agarwal
Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
K. E. Young, W. A. Robbins, L. Xun, D. Elashoff, S. A. Rothmann, and S. D. Perreault
Evaluation of Chromosome Breakage and DNA Integrity in Sperm: An Investigation of Remote Semen Collection Conditions
J Androl, November 1, 2003; 24(6): 853 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J AndrolHome page
M. Muratori, M. Maggi, S. Spinelli, E. Filimberti, G. Forti, and E. Baldi
Spontaneous DNA Fragmentation in Swim-Up Selected Human Spermatozoa During Long Term Incubation
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 253 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E.H. Duran, M. Morshedi, S. Taylor, and S. Oehninger
Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3122 - 3128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. Richthoff, M. Spano, Y.L. Giwercman, B. Frohm, K. Jepson, J. Malm, S. Elzanaty, M. Stridsberg, and A. Giwercman
The impact of testicular and accessory sex gland function on sperm chromatin integrity as assessed by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3162 - 3169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. Vicari, A. Perdichizzi, A. De Palma, N. Burrello, R. D'Agata, and A. E. Calogero
Globozoospermia is associated with chromatin structure abnormalities: Case report
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2128 - 2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
H.-M. Shen, J. Dai, S.-E. Chia, A. Lim, and C.-N. Ong
Detection of apoptotic alterations in sperm in subfertile patients and their correlations with sperm quality
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1266 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Zhao, C. R. Shirley, Y. E. Yu, B. Mohapatra, Y. Zhang, E. Unni, J. M. Deng, N. A. Arango, N. H. A. Terry, M. M. Weil, et al.
Targeted Disruption of the Transition Protein 2 Gene Affects Sperm Chromatin Structure and Reduces Fertility in Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 7243 - 7255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
W. Kuczynski, M. Dhont, C. Grygoruk, D. Grochowski, S. Wolczynski, and M. Szamatowicz
The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa--a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2109 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Ollero, E. Gil-Guzman, M. C. Lopez, R. K. Sharma, A. Agarwal, K. Larson, D. Evenson, A. J. Thomas Jr, and J. G. Alvarez
Characterization of subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: implications in the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1912 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Emiliani, M. Van den Bergh, A.-S. Vannin, J. Biramane, M. Verdoodt, and Y. Englert
Evidence of reduced single-stranded testicular sperm DNA from obstructive azoospermic men after 3 days of in-vitro culture
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1200 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. E. Miller and T. T. Smith
The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 918 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
K.L. Larson, C.J. DeJonge, A.M. Barnes, L.K. Jost, and D.P. Evenson
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2000; 15(8): 1717 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. T. Donnelly, M. O'Connell, N. McClure, and S. E.M. Lewis
Differences in nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared human spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1552 - 1561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. Barroso, M. Morshedi, and S. Oehninger
Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1338 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Spano, E. Cordelli, G. Leter, F. Lombardo, A. Lenzi, and L. Gandini
Nuclear chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 5(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Andrology.