Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hellstrom, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hellstrom, W. J.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 15, Issue 4 309-310, Copyright © 1994 by The American Society of Andrology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Tunica vaginalis sperm reservoir in a monkey model of vas deferens obstruction

M. Monga, R. Wang, J. A. Roberts and W. J. Hellstrom
Tulane Regional Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana.

Repeat microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) is used to treat congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD). Use of alloplastic implants as reservoirs results in poor sperm motility and pregnancy rates. An autoplastic tunica vaginalis reservoir for epididymal sperm has been used in four patients, with one resultant pregnancy. We studied this technique in a monkey model. Eight reservoirs were created in four monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). The vas deferens was ligated close to the epididymis. A transverse incision was made in the caput epididymis, and sperm were aspirated for analysis. Cut margins of the epididymal duct were sutured open to the visceral layer of the tunica vaginalis. The defect in the parietal layer of the tunica vaginalis was repaired, and sterile Tyrode's solution was instilled in the potential space between the parietal and visceral layers. Initial epididymal sperm obtained at the creation of the sperm reservoir demonstrated adequate mean motility (60.5%, grade 1.5), morphology (82.8% normal), and viability by Eosin-Y exclusion (69.9%). At 4 weeks, no reservoirs were palpable. Percutaneous aspiration (25-gauge angiocatheter) yielded no fluid. Surgical exposure of the reservoirs demonstrated significant adhesions and scar formation between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis, obliterating the potential space. No sperm were detected in irrigant fluids at this time. In conclusion, adhesion and scar formation may prevent use of the tunica vaginalis reservoir as an alternative to repeat MESA in treatment of CAVD.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society of Andrology.