Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez, T. J.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 11, Issue 6 555-562, Copyright © 1990 by The American Society of Andrology

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Gonadotroph and Leydig cell responsiveness in the male rat. Effects of experimental left varicocele

T. T. Turner, W. S. Evans and T. J. Lopez
Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

Previous experiments have found that experimental left-sided varicocele (ELV) in rats is associated with significant bilateral reductions in intratesticular testosterone concentrations. The current experiments were performed to determine the source of this endocrinopathy. Sensitivity and responsivity of Leydig cells and gonadotrophs were determined in control male rats and in those with ELV. Initially, dose-response relationships were determined for luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulation of testosterone secretion by Leydig cells and for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulation of LH secretion by gonadotrophs. Maximally (ED100) and half-maximally (ED50) stimulating doses of LH and LHRH were selected from these studies and administered to sham-operated and ELV rats 30 days after the operation to induce ELV. Leydig cell and gonadotroph sensitivity (response to ED50) and responsivity (response to ED100) to LH and LHRH, respectively, were determined. Responsivity of Leydig cells in control and ELV rats was similar. Responsivity of gonadotrophs to LHRH was significantly suppressed in ELV animals, but the physiologic relevance of this singular finding is unclear. It is possible that the previously determined ELV-associated decrease in intratesticular testosterone concentrations is subsequent to a wash-out phenomenon that follows the increased testicular blood flow that also is known to be associated with ELV.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by The American Society of Andrology.